Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:51:51 +1000 Keith Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:11:34 -0400 > Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Before major surgery, I tried the file that started all > > of this. It was a .odt that would not open in 2.0 and > > was built by

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Keith Bates
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:11:34 -0400 Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Before major surgery, I tried the file that started all > of this. It was a .odt that would not open in 2.0 and > was built by my wife on win2.0.2. > > It works for me now (with only font issues to resolve), > so I

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:11:34 -0400 Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was a .odt that would not open in 2.0 and > was built by my wife on win2.0.2. CorrectionIt was a .ott Lee - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:50:43 -0600 jimw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'which OpenOffice' Didn't work, Jim. Probably because the whole start procedure is scripted. Apparently I succeeded by accident though. All seems to be working now. Thanks Lee -

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:22:55 -0400 Lee Wiggers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:37:58 -0400 > "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:03 -0400, Lee Wiggers wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:57:05 -0400 > > > "G. Roderick Singleton"

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-24 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:37:58 -0400 "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:03 -0400, Lee Wiggers wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:57:05 -0400 > > "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Go to http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/inde

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-23 Thread jimw
Lee Wiggers wrote: On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:57:05 -0400 "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Go to http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/index.html and get the setup guide. -- Okay...I just installed parallel to 2.0 with 2.0.2 I'm getting a headache. Where is 2.0

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-23 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 17:03 -0400, Lee Wiggers wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:57:05 -0400 > "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Go to http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/index.html and get the setup > > guide. > > -- > > Okay...I just installed parallel to 2.0 wi

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-23 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:57:05 -0400 "G. Roderick Singleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Go to http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/index.html and get the setup > guide. > -- Okay...I just installed parallel to 2.0 with 2.0.2 I'm getting a headache. Where is 2.0.2 and what command opens

Re: [users] Linux Install

2006-06-23 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 09:48 -0400, Lee Wiggers wrote: > Starting over with fresh install and I forgot how. (Gulp) > > Can somebody please point me to the directions again? > > oo 2.0.2 > Mandriva 2006 Community Go to http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.2/index.html and get the setup guide. -- PL

[users] Linux Install

2006-06-23 Thread Lee Wiggers
Starting over with fresh install and I forgot how. (Gulp) Can somebody please point me to the directions again? oo 2.0.2 Mandriva 2006 Community TIA Lee Wiggers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

Re: [users] linux install of 2.0.1 has failed miserably

2006-02-01 Thread Dave Barton
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 15:40 -0600, Kevin Tomasek wrote: > i already had 2.0.0 installed. (it was working fine, why did i try to > upgrade? silly me) > i downloaded/untarred. > as root, rpm -Uivh as the install web page directed. > > now soffice is nowhere to be found!! find . -name soffice find

[users] Re:[users] linux install of 2.0.1 has failed miserably

2006-02-01 Thread Kevin Tomasek
more info.. two conflicting outputs [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -Uivh *rpm Preparing...### [100%] package openoffice.org-core08-2.0.1-1 is already installed package openoffice.org-core07-2.0.1-1 is already installed

[users] linux install of 2.0.1 has failed miserably

2006-02-01 Thread Kevin Tomasek
i already had 2.0.0 installed. (it was working fine, why did i try to upgrade? silly me) i downloaded/untarred. as root, rpm -Uivh as the install web page directed. now soffice is nowhere to be found!! find . -name soffice finds the old 2.0.0 version. starting soffice from the old location ind

Re: [users] Linux Install?

2005-11-01 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 12:47 +1100, Simon Jarman wrote: > How do you install Open Office? I can't find any instructions > anywhere. I have a Debian-based linux system, but cannot install via > Synaptic for some annoying dependency reason. So, I have downloaded > OOo_2.0.0_LinuxIntel_install.ta

Re: [users] Linux Install?

2005-11-01 Thread Dan Lewis
On Monday 31 October 2005 07:47 pm, Simon Jarman wrote: > How do you install Open Office? I can't find any instructions > anywhere. I have a Debian-based linux system, but cannot install via > Synaptic for some annoying dependency reason. So, I have downloaded > OOo_2.0.0_LinuxIntel_install.tar.

Re: [users] Linux Install?

2005-10-31 Thread Keith Bates
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:47:13 +1100 Simon Jarman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you install Open Office? I can't find any instructions > anywhere. I have a Debian-based linux system, but cannot install via > Synaptic for some annoying dependency reason. So, I have downloaded > OOo_2.0.0_

[users] Linux Install?

2005-10-31 Thread Simon Jarman
How do you install Open Office? I can't find any instructions anywhere. I have a Debian-based linux system, but cannot install via Synaptic for some annoying dependency reason. So, I have downloaded OOo_2.0.0_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz. What next? Thanks in advance, Simon -- Dr Simon Jarma

Re: [users] Linux install of 2.0 Beta

2005-05-25 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:52 +1000, Andrew Greig wrote: > Hi , > > I have been using OOo for some time now, but the latest install of > OOo2.0Beta has me puzzled. Why make /opt the default directory, why not > give me the option to install it in /usr/local where I have Acrobat and > Netscape an

[users] Linux install of 2.0 Beta

2005-05-25 Thread Andrew Greig
Hi , I have been using OOo for some time now, but the latest install of OOo2.0Beta has me puzzled. Why make /opt the default directory, why not give me the option to install it in /usr/local where I have Acrobat and Netscape and Mozilla and Gramps, etc. Nothing ever goes in /opt, I have no