Hameed Yussuph wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking
at current trends, the document people still will be viewing on
their mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows
Mobile, are Microsoft proprietary
On 23/03/2008, Hameed Yussuph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 22/03/2008 21:26, Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows Mobile, are
Microsoft proprietary document formats. If the ODF community is very
serious (extremely
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows Mobile, are
Microsoft proprietary document formats. If the ODF community is
On 23/03/2008 13:25, James Knott wrote:
You're confusing file formats (ODF) with applications (OpenOffice).
There are many applications that work with ODF files, OpenOffice being
but one of them.
snip
Please, where can I find a good list of such applications?
--
Harold Fuchs
London,
On 22/03/2008 21:26, Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows Mobile, are
Microsoft proprietary document formats. If the
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 23/03/2008 13:25, James Knott wrote:
You're confusing file formats (ODF) with applications (OpenOffice).
There are many applications that work with ODF files, OpenOffice
being but one of them.
snip
Please, where can I find a good list of such applications?
Off
James Knott wrote:
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows Mobile, are
Microsoft proprietary document formats. If the
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 22/03/2008 21:26, Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Hello again, More people are turning to mobile devices and looking at
current trends, the document people still will be viewing on their
mobiles; Symbian, BlackBerry and the ubiquitous Windows Mobile, are
Microsoft proprietary
Fred A. Miller wrote:
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Is there any likelihood of a mobile version such as Quick Office or
Microsoft Office for Windows Mobile
What do you mean by mobile? There is portable OO that will run on
USB memory, if that's a help.
Fred
I think he was referring to the pocket
Is there any likelihood of a mobile version such as Quick Office or
Microsoft Office for Windows Mobile
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Is there any likelihood of a mobile version such as Quick Office or
Microsoft Office for Windows Mobile
What do you mean by mobile? There is portable OO that will run on USB
memory, if that's a help.
Fred
--
Security in Windows comes from patching a sieve.
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Is there any likelihood of a mobile version such as Quick Office or
Microsoft Office for Windows Mobile
Since neither of those have anything to do with OpenOffice, you're
asking in the wrong place.
--
Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org
On 20/03/2008 11:48, James Knott wrote:
Hameed Yussuph wrote:
Is there any likelihood of a mobile version such as Quick Office or
Microsoft Office for Windows Mobile
Since neither of those have anything to do with OpenOffice, you're
asking in the wrong place.
No he's not; he's asking if
14 matches
Mail list logo
