Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-08 Thread Thomas E Webb
I tried this question six weeks ago and got no answer, but with the indulgence of the list I'd like to try it again, in the hope that someone might have a new thought about it: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should have To Frame among

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-07 Thread John Kaufmann
Hi Tom, In a message dated 2009.11.06 17:28 -0500, TomW wrote: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should have To Frame among its Anchor options. In a document I wrote are ~30 pictures inside frames - but only half of them have the Anchor..

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-07 Thread John Kaufmann
Hi Andy, First, I want to thank you for taking the time to study my example. In a message dated 2009.11.06 21:47 -0500, Andy wrote: In going over your file I found out several things. 1: That at least one, the first one, had two frames. That one had the To Frame option available for

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-07 Thread Barbara Duprey
John Kaufmann wrote: I tried this question six weeks ago and got no answer, but with the indulgence of the list I'd like to try it again, in the hope that someone might have a new thought about it: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-07 Thread Andy
John Kaufmann wrote: Hi Andy, First, I want to thank you for taking the time to study my example. Your welcome. Seeing the actual file makes it easer for me than trying to visualize what someone is talking about. 1: That at least one, the first one, had two frames. That one had the To

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-07 Thread John Kaufmann
Andy, Since we are on the same page in our findings, I won't bother with point-by-point agreement, but the final conclusion does bear some comment: In a message dated 2009.11.07 10:45 -0500, Andy wrote: The problem as I see it is that Any graphic in a frame should have the 'To Frame'

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-06 Thread John Kaufmann
Hi Andrew, In a message dated 2009.11.06 02:44 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: I feel like I see this question off and on... :-) ! According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should have To Frame among its Anchor options. That sounds

[users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-05 Thread John Kaufmann
I tried this question six weeks ago and got no answer, but with the indulgence of the list I'd like to try it again, in the hope that someone might have a new thought about it: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should have To Frame among its

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-05 Thread Andy
John Kaufmann wrote: I tried this question six weeks ago and got no answer, but with the indulgence of the list I'd like to try it again, in the hope that someone might have a new thought about it: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should

Re: [users] Pictures inside frames - Anchor To Frame

2009-11-05 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I feel like I see this question off and on... On 11/05/2009 02:26 PM, John Kaufmann wrote: According to the OO documentation (Working with Graphics), any picture inside a frame should have To Frame among its Anchor options. That sounds WRONG. I can think of no particular reason that an image