Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:42:08 +0300 "Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly. Americans enjoy an extremely low border-length/area ratio, > and are thus exposed to very little outside culture. Add that to their > very diverse landscape, and they have little reason to travel outside > their

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

2008/5/23 Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We do need to make allowances on an international mailing list, abusing > people for not understanding something they have probably not come > across before doesn't help. You have to remember some people on the list > may not have even visited a non-En

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:08:40 -0700 (PDT) amaloney wrote: > > Twayne-2 wrote > > "If you are receiving over 140,000 > (assuming your "." was supposed to be a "," to indicate thousands), or > even if it's only 140/day" > > P > Twayne-2, please stop showing your American ignorance of the rest of >

Re: Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

Twayne-2 wrote "If you are receiving over 140,000 (assuming your "." was supposed to be a "," to indicate thousands), or even if it's only 140/day" P Twayne-2, please stop showing your American ignorance of the rest of the world. Al -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Pos

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

In a message dated 2008.05.22 03:06 -0500, Dotan Cohen wrote: Don't forget to file a bug with Microsoft about the problem with Outlook Express so that they can fix it. Surely you jest? -- John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

2008/5/20 Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nothing abnormal there. I would suggest your MUA (Outlook Express > 6.00.2900.3138) is broken. You could download Thunderbird and give that > a go. > Don't forget to file a bug with Microsoft about the problem with Outlook Express so that they can fix

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On May 20, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Jerry Clancy wrote: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. Jerry maybe 2 reasons 1. you're using outlook express? 2. you going through gmane? I see M

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

- Original Message - From: "Jerry Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:41 PM Subject: Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack --- This email has a text attachement with the following plus a signature.asc file as well.

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

- Original Message - From: "Jack D. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:17 PM Subject: Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack Jerry Clancy wrote the following on 5/20/2008 11:22 AM: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Wed, 21 May 2008 08:02:18 +1200 Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:22:40 -0400 > Jerry Clancy wrote: > > > Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an > > empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless > > necessary.

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:22:40 -0400 Jerry Clancy wrote: > Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an > empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless > necessary. > > Jerry > She sends 2 part messages: *** Part 1 header *** --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Conte

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

Jerry Clancy wrote: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. I don't get any attachments. -- Use OpenOffice.org -

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Tue, 20 May 2008 13:22:40 -0400 "Jerry Clancy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Jerry, > Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has > an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless > necessary. It's because of the fact that Michelle electronicall

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:17:11 -0600 "Jack D. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerry Clancy wrote the following on 5/20/2008 11:22 AM: > > Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an > > empty > > message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary.

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

Jerry Clancy wrote the following on 5/20/2008 11:22 AM: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. Jerry I haven't noticed any empty messages from her. Maybe Outlook isn't parsing mess

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

Jerry Clancy wrote: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. Jerry 20080520 1308 GMT-6 I have just looked 50 or so messages from this person and there is not a single attachment on any

Re: [users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

On 20/05/2008 18:22, Jerry Clancy wrote: Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. Jerry As far as I'm concerned they don't. I read this list either with Thunderbird (POP) or with Fir

[users] Posts from Michelle Konzack

Would somebody please tell me why virtually every post from her has an empty message with an attachment? I don't open attachments unless necessary. Jerry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-