PIERRE Francois SPP wrote:
I am using Open office 2.0.2 and 1.1.5 on 2 computers(home,company).
The MS doc file Runion.doc does not look correctly with
Open office 2.0.2, and is OK with 1.1.5(see the corresponding
.doc and pdf files, first page in :
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07.doc
to whom should I sent a bug report?
The URL is below. You'll need to create a login first:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html
Thanks, /paul
--
Vista is "dramatically more secure than any other operating system
released" Bill Gates
Huh ?? Defender doesn't stop spyware (
unsubscribe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/28/2007 11:01 AM, Anthony Chilco wrote:
> I loaded the file with 2.1 and it looks the same as the 2.0.2 pdf. It
> appears that some parts of the document that have the default style are
> taking the characteristics of the 'heading 5' style, which is used in
> various places in the doc. The
I loaded the file with 2.1 and it looks the same as the 2.0.2 pdf. It
appears that some parts of the document that have the default style are
taking the characteristics of the 'heading 5' style, which is used in
various places in the doc. The file looks right when loaded in Word97.
tc
Michael
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:17:26 +1300
Paul wrote:
> > The MS doc file Runion.doc does not look correctly with
> > Open office 2.0.2, and is OK with 1.1.5(see the corresponding
> > .doc and pdf files, first page in :
> > http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07.doc
> > http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierr
The MS doc file Runion.doc does not look correctly with
Open office 2.0.2, and is OK with 1.1.5(see the corresponding
.doc and pdf files, first page in :
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07.doc
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07_Oo2.0.2.pdf
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07_Oo
I am using Open office 2.0.2 and 1.1.5 on 2 computers(home,company).
The MS doc file Runion.doc does not look correctly with
Open office 2.0.2, and is OK with 1.1.5(see the corresponding
.doc and pdf files, first page in :
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/pierre/Runion07.doc
http://pierre.web.cern.ch/p
I would have to both agree and disagree with Terry on this one.
There have been huge improvements in OpenOffice since I first
discovered the program around 1.1.4 when I went to Uni and all the
machines ran linux. Back then it was a bit of a novelty that anything
existed as a free alternative
TerryJ wrote:
It is no news that the software is not improving overall with new releases.
Since 2.0.3, it seems that the releases have become increasingly
experimental and unreliable. Bugs remain unfixed and new bugs are created.
Whoever is in charge (if anyone is) seems not to have a clue.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using version 2.0.2 of OpenOffice.org. - WRITER My problem
> is : IF I COPY A TEXT WITH AN IMAGE (FOR EXAMPLE FROM INTERNET)
> , WHEN I PASTE I CAN SEE THE TEXT, BUT NOT ANY IMAGES.
>
> HOW CAN I SOLVE THIS
> PROBLEM?
> THANK YOU.
> BEST REGARDS.
Does this only ha
Hello,
Please thank CP Hennessy for his or her help with my recent query. This direct
response with very helpful guidance makes Open Office even better than "Word".
Regards,
Bert Arter, Stibbard, Norfolk, England
Researching ARTER, BONE, GAGE, LANGLEY, WIDOWSON and many others
12 matches
Mail list logo
