On Wednesday 19 January 2005 11:17, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> James Kelleher wrote:
> >On Wednesday 19 January 2005 05:56, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> >>Mark Kirchner wrote:
> >>>On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:11:44 PM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> >this basically is normal situation.. except that ther
James Kelleher wrote:
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 05:56, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
Mark Kirchner wrote:
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:11:44 PM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
this basically is normal situation.. except that there seems to be no
swap actually.
how do you configure your swapsp
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 05:56, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> Mark Kirchner wrote:
> >On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:11:44 PM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> >>>this basically is normal situation.. except that there seems to be no
> >>>swap actually.
> >>>
> >>>how do you configure your swapspace ?
> >>>
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 04:23, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> James Tappin wrote:
> >Basically the processes you are running have exceeded the total RAM+Swap
> >space on your system. There are 3 thing you can do:
> >1) Don't run as many processes (check for memory hogs before running OO
> >and close
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 13:23 +0100, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> James Tappin wrote:
>
> >Basically the processes you are running have exceeded the total RAM+Swap
> >space on your system. There are 3 thing you can do:
> >1) Don't run as many processes (check for memory hogs before running OO
> >and clos
Mark Kirchner wrote:
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:11:44 PM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
this basically is normal situation.. except that there seems to be no
swap actually.
how do you configure your swapspace ?
you could try running from console these commands :
free
swapon -s
(second one might r
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:11:44 PM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
>> this basically is normal situation.. except that there seems to be no
>> swap actually.
>>
>> how do you configure your swapspace ?
>>
>> you could try running from console these commands :
>> free
>> swapon -s
>> (second one migh
--
> From: Duncan Lithgow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:12 PM
> To: users@openoffice.org
> Subject: Re: [users] soffice.bin process killed - why!?
>
>
> This message uses a character set that is not supported by
> the Internet Service. To
Rich wrote:
Duncan Lithgow wrote:
James Tappin wrote:
Basically the processes you are running have exceeded the total
RAM+Swap
space on your system. There are 3 thing you can do:
1) Don't run as many processes (check for memory hogs before running OO
and close some down).
2) Create a bigger swap p
Duncan Lithgow wrote:
James Tappin wrote:
Basically the processes you are running have exceeded the total RAM+Swap
space on your system. There are 3 thing you can do:
1) Don't run as many processes (check for memory hogs before running OO
and close some down).
2) Create a bigger swap partition or f
James Tappin wrote:
Basically the processes you are running have exceeded the total RAM+Swap
space on your system. There are 3 thing you can do:
1) Don't run as many processes (check for memory hogs before running OO
and close some down).
2) Create a bigger swap partition or file
3) Buy more memory
Maybe I spoke too soon so if my other post doesn't help - you might like to
read this article:
http://dag.wieers.com/howto/compatibility/
Rob Winchester
--- Duncan Lithgow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> System: pc running an up-to-date Fedora Core 3 install with OOo 1.1.2.
>
> As the results
I *think* this really is from /tmp getting filled up. try cleaning out the temp
directory (should be /tmp). make sure you get rid of any sub-dirs that might be
in there. You might want to do a fsck (on all drives) though maybe a good
reboot might also be in order after cleaning out /tmp.
I don't
actually it's summarised in the last line - out of memory.
i don't feel brave enough to determine your ram size from this output -
how much ram does that box have ?
are you running a lot of processes there ? if not, then something is
memleaking and when memory is full, next process that requests
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:54:17 +0100
Duncan Lithgow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DL> System: pc running an up-to-date Fedora Core 3 install with OOo
DL> 1.1.2.
DL>
DL> As the results of a dmesg below shows I've got something going
DL> wrong, and I've now twice lost my work in an openoffice doc. I'm n
System: pc running an up-to-date Fedora Core 3 install with OOo 1.1.2.
As the results of a dmesg below shows I've got something going wrong,
and I've now twice lost my work in an openoffice doc. I'm new to Linux
so it's possible that this is a Linux/ setup problem. If I understand
the dmesg it s
16 matches
Mail list logo
