Hey guys. I reported a bug some months ago, not being able to stop and
restart a container, getting a timeout instead. When I reported the bug
months ago, I was unable to replicate it at the time. But here it is
once again: I cannot stop or restart the VE.
This clip shows the results which I
I recently had a similar result from an Archlinux template, however I would
need to know more about the container to be able to relate it to my case.
Can you vzctl enter it?
I have a restart problem on a self made gentoo container however I
know the cause. It gets locked up trying to stop
Hi,
and any entries logged in kern.log/dmesg as well ?
Bye,
Thorsten
Steven Crothers schrieb:
What template are you using and where did you get it from?
I recently had a similar result from an Archlinux template, however I would
need to know more about the container to be able to relate it
It gets locked up trying to stop nfsmount. I believe
the problem is the virtual nic is down before the nfsmount tries to
stop and nfsmount waits forever to close the connection to the
server..
Interesting. No connections made here, though; no NFS or similar.
Would that apply to open listening
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Gregor at HostGIS gre...@hostgis.com wrote:
It gets locked up trying to stop nfsmount. I believe
the problem is the virtual nic is down before the nfsmount tries to
stop and nfsmount waits forever to close the connection to the
server..
Interesting. No
What does this mean?
CT: 85: failed to start with err=-12
I see that -12 is ENOMEM. Does this really indicate that my HN is full
and can't run anymore VEs?
Also, can someone explain to me the proper usage of vzmemcheck and how
to interpret its output?
--
HostGIS, Open Source solutions for
Is there anyone on this list that can update me on the progress of libvirt
integration with openvz? With the latest libvirt I am able to start and
stop a domain that is defined with a openvz config file, but I have not
yet been able to migrate to full libvirt control As an example migration
Perhaps this question is better suited to the libvirt list? Since OpenVZ
does nothing to support libvirt afaik...
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@openvz.org [mailto:users-boun...@openvz.org] On Behalf
Of Nathan Stratton
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:41 PM
To: users@openvz.org
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Steven Crothers wrote:
Perhaps this question is better suited to the libvirt list? Since OpenVZ
does nothing to support libvirt afaik...
I have actually, the problem is libvirt already supports all of this, the
issue is on the interfacing with OpenVZ side of things just
