On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
> The nodes are EL6.3 based.
>
> Currently installed libvirt packages:
>
> libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
> libvirt-cim-0.6.1-3.el6.x86_64
> libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
> libvirt-python-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
> libvirt-client-0.9.10-
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:26:25PM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Ok, I presumed that indeed.
> But right today one guy asked me about that feature in rhevm and I
> remembered this ovirt thread so I thought it could be the right place to
> ask for confirmation
That's fine, I value your questions
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:30:39PM +0800, Royce Lv wrote:
>
>
>
> 3. Actions we will take:
> (1)As a work round we can first remove the zombie reaper from
> supervdsm server
> (2)I'll see whether python has a fixed version for this
It does not seem so:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2c0197c9
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:07:32PM -0500, Mike Burns wrote:
> The beta versions of oVirt 3.2 are now available. Packages can be
> installed using the ovirt-beta yum repository [1] after installing the
> ovirt-release package[1].
>
> oVirt Node is not currently available. It should be made availa
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
> The beta versions of oVirt 3.2 are now available. Packages can be
> installed using the ovirt-beta yum repository [1] after installing the
> ovirt-release package[1].
>
> oVirt Node is not currently available. It should be made available in
> t
On 01/31/2013 10:25 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
>>> The nodes are EL6.3 based.
>>>
>>> Currently installed libvirt packages:
>>>
>>> libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
>>> libv
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
> > The nodes are EL6.3 based.
> >
> > Currently installed libvirt packages:
> >
> > libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
> > libvirt-cim-0.6.1-3.el6.x86_64
> > libvirt-0.9.10-2
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:08:58AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 10:25 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
> >>> The nodes are EL6.3 based.
> >>>
> >>> Currently installed l
during install of server I get this
Host installation failed. Fix installation issues and try to Re-Install
In deploy log
2013-01-31 12:17:30 DEBUG
otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vdsm.hardware
hardware._isVirtualizationEnabled:144 virtualization support
GenuineIntel (cpu: False, bios: True)
201
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> during install of server I get this
> Host installation failed. Fix installation issues and try to Re-Install
>
> In deploy log
>
>
> 2013-01-31 12:17:30 DEBUG
> otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vdsm.hardware
> hardware._isVirtualizationEnab
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> BTW: I did use this same host in this hw configuration from a bios
> point of view as a host for a RHEV 3.0 beta about one year ago...
screenshots of bios setting for this r815 server:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvbno5b2w
Output of command
# virsh capabilities
on this host
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveG5OaVBZN1VENlU/edit
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 01/31/2013 04:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:07:32PM -0500, Mike Burns wrote:
The beta versions of oVirt 3.2 are now available. Packages can be
installed using the ovirt-beta yum repository [1] after installing the
ovirt-release package[1].
oVirt Node is not current
On 01/31/2013 04:43 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
The beta versions of oVirt 3.2 are now available. Packages can be
installed using the ovirt-beta yum repository [1] after installing the
ovirt-release package[1].
oVirt Node is not currently avail
non responsive state for host means that you either have a network issue
(iptables perhaps) or vdsmd is down.
please attach vdsm and libvirtd logs.
On 01/31/2013 01:21 PM, Juan Jose wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have installed and configured oVirt 3.1 engine in a Fedora 17 with a
> Fedora 17 n
On 01/31/2013 02:26 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
> non responsive state for host means that you either have a network issue
> (iptables perhaps) or vdsmd is down.
> please attach vdsm and libvirtd logs.
>
>
By looking the engine.log below there are network issues:
2013-01-31 11:49:54,121 ERROR
[org.ovi
Hi Gianluca can you post/attach/provide the output of cpuid?
# cpuid
In case it's not installed it's provided by the rpm:
cpuid-20120601-2.fc18.x86_64
Thanks,
--
Federico
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:24:41 PM
> Su
Hello Moti,
The execution of this command in the host is:
[root@ovirt-host ~]# vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps
HBAInventory = {'iSCSI': [{'InitiatorName':
'iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:69e9aaf7e4c'}], 'FC': []}
ISCSIInitiatorName = iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:69e9aaf7e4c
bondings = {'bond4': {'addr': '', 'cfg': {
I'm looking at your log.
you have a problem connecting to the storage.
are you sure that the host is non-responsive and not Non-Operational?
the problem started at 11:49:48
Thread-194::ERROR::2013-01-31
11:49:48,785::domainMonitor::120::Storage.DomainMonitor::(_monitorDomain) Error
while collec
On 01/31/2013 03:37 PM, Juan Jose wrote:
> Hello Moti,
>
> The execution of this command in the host is:
This indicates VDSM is up and running correctly, but the ovirt-engine
can't reach it.
Can you check the connectivity from the ovirt-engine to the host (use
the same address as used to add it
On 01/31/2013 11:56 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:08:58AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On 01/31/2013 10:25 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
> The nodes a
Shu,
I build oVirt Engine and vdsm from source myself. The commits I indicated
are what I built from.I run the engine under FC17 and my nodes are running
EL6.x respectively.
Dan,
I reverted VDSM on my two test nodes to an earlier build of VDSM (commit:
c343e1833f7b6e5428dd90f14f7807dca1baa0b4)
VDS
See attached images...
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Doh, brain fart VDSM is not involved here for the purposed of the needed
test.
Here is my initial whack at it:
Source Node:
virsh # list
IdName State
1 sl63 running
virsh # migrate
note ignore the IP diff in the ssh host auth --> copy/paste fail ;)
- DHC
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Dead Horse
wrote:
> Doh, brain fart VDSM is not involved here for the purposed of the needed
> test.
> Here is my initial whack at it:
>
> Source Node:
>
> virsh # list
> IdName
Here is the content exceprt from libvirtd.log for the command: virsh #
migrate --p2p sl63 qemu+ssh://192.168.1.2/system
2013-01-31 18:02:53.740+: 2832: debug : virDomainFree:2313 :
dom=0x7f4f88000c80, (VM: name=sl63,
uuid=887d764a-f835-4112-9eda-836a772ea5eb)
2013-01-31 18:02:53.743+: 2831
Alon,
the diff between the two hardware.py files you sent is:
$ diff hardware.py_first hardware.py_second
108c108
< ret = struct.unpack('L', f.read(8))[0]
---
> ret = struct.unpack('L', f.read(8))[0]
so they seem quite the same
And in engine.log it complai
Sorry about that.
Can you please install these[1] rpms?
It won't solve anything just provide me more information.
Thanks!
[1]
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-host-deploy_create_rpms_fedora/jdk=java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64,label=fedora18/
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Sorry about that.
>
> Can you please install these[1] rpms?
>
> It won't solve anything just provide me more information.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1]
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-host-deploy_create_rpms_fedora/jdk=java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64,la
- Original Message -
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 12:19:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] 3.2 beta and f18 host on dell R815 problem
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Sorry about that.
> >
> > Can
30 matches
Mail list logo
