Re: [ovirt-users] [Gluster-users] GlusterFS for production use with Ovirt

2015-03-24 Thread Paul Robert Marino
A few things to clarify 1) are all 4 for Gluster or are they the whole cluster. keep in mind that Ovirt expects that you are running Gluster on different nodes than your VM's. while I do not completely agree with that idea that is how it is now. 2) RAID hardware is not necessarily a bad thing, in

Re: [ovirt-users] Adding domain to oVirt to 3.5 issue

2014-11-25 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Did you recently update Cyrus SASL?-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Nov 25, 2014 11:09 AM, Juan Jose wrote: Hello again,Yes the password is correct, I can login in a Windows machine to my domain siee.local with the user Juanjo. Moreover I have chanbged this user password to simpler one and the result is

Re: [ovirt-users] upgrade glusterfs under ovirt

2014-11-12 Thread Paul Robert Marino
I just did this today but in posixfs mode not native Gluster mode.After the update of each gluster node restart the process and manually trigger a heal on each of the volumes. What ever you do NOT start upgrading the next gluster node until you have verified that the heal is complete on all volumes

Re: [ovirt-users] adding machine to openldap + kerberos with a keytab

2014-09-10 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Interesting so does that mean it can support GSSAPI authentication from the browser like the apache modules?-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Sep 10, 2014 7:32 PM, William Law wrote: Cool - I'll start looking at that now. Regards, Will On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: > > > -

Re: [ovirt-users] adding machine to openldap + kerberos with a keytab

2014-09-10 Thread Paul Robert Marino
WilliamThank you as well I have noticed from the logs that if the manager interface isn't used in a while it has to reinitialize or renew the ticket in the cache. This process can cause a noticeable delay in logins and using a keytab. This is a part of (but not the whole) reason keytabs exist in ke

Re: [ovirt-users] adding machine to openldap + kerberos with a keytab

2014-09-10 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Actually I haven't delved very deep into it but I know its not using a keytab its actually authenticating to the Kerberos server and doing a SASL bind.In a way this is actually proper functionality; however I have to admit it would be nice to have the option of using a keytab.-- Sent from my HP Pre

Re: [ovirt-users] Reachability problems after putting ovirtmgmt and Gluster on different networks

2014-09-09 Thread Paul Robert Marino
That is a routing nightmare unless you are using network namespaces to isolate your processes which is in and of its self a nightmare because the tools are as good as I would like them to be.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Sep 9, 2014 1:24 PM, Stefano Stagnaro wrote: Hi, I have a question about an Hoste

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt/gluster storage questions for 2-3 node datacenter

2014-08-29 Thread Paul Robert Marino
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 08/29/2014 07:34 PM, David King wrote: >> >> Paul, >> >> Thanks for the response. >> >> You mention that the issue is orphaned files during updates when one >> node is down. However I am less concerned about adding and removing >> files b

Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt/gluster storage questions for 2-3 node datacenter

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Robert Marino
I'll try to answer some of these.1) its not a serious problem persay the issue is if one node goes down and you delete a file while the second node is down it will be restored when the second node comes back which may cause orphaned files where as if you use 3 servers they will use quorum to figure

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
I think we now have enough for a proper ticket. I will create one latter today. also since I have RHEV support for my production instances I will also create a matching case with Red Hat. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > Ok > I dug in a little further it look

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
ore design. Interestingly I can add roles to the group and there is no problem it sets it correctly so somewhere else in the code an ilike is being uses to query the groups table. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > I found why the group_ids field is wrong > >

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
ot;/groups/sysadmin" then removed and added a user now the if for that group in the group_ids field is being set correctly. This is at least a usable workaround for now. now we need to find the root cause. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > confirmed that does s

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
permission?" Ive tried it ever different way I can think of the results are always the same. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: > > > - Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul Robert Marino" >> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" >> Cc: &q

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
sions sub tab when you click the group." yes On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > here are the results of the queries you asked for > > > group_ids > > | > >

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-17 Thread Paul Robert Marino
--+--- eee0----123456789eee | Everyone 2a8a8401-fc9e-11e3-8742-861538ea406a | /Groups/sysadmin (2 rows) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Paul Robert Marino" >> To: "Yair Zasl

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-13 Thread Paul Robert Marino
field is used for presentation purpose only. > > Presentation wise only - means that it is not used for our permissions > calculation , for example. > >> Alon has addressed our plans for this in his previous comments. >> I hope this clarifies more.. >> >> Yair >

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-10 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Cc: users@ovirt.org >> Sent: Friday, August 8, 2014 3:45:07 PM >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Itamar Heim" >> > To: "Paul Robert Marino&qu

Re: [ovirt-users] New member and first question...

2014-08-07 Thread Paul Robert Marino
By the way David have you ever done a Red Hat kickstart with the nobase option. You get an OS install thats as stripped down as possible. you can even create a node for ovirt which is smaller than the ESXi install base last I checked. just be aware you will not have many of the tools you would norm

[ovirt-users] ovirt with 389 server inactive groups

2014-08-07 Thread Paul Robert Marino
I have ovirt engine running and connected to a 389 server with the memberof plugin enabled and working properly. I can add users and assign them to roles without any issues. when I look at a user I can see all the LDAP groups they are a member of. when I run engine-manage-domains -action=valida

Re: [ovirt-users] How do i use local storage of hosts with ovirt?

2014-05-28 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Um I missed the earlier part of this thread but I can tell you from experience not using shared storage of one kind or an other for virtualization is always a mistake you will regret latter. Its a common (almost default) mistake people who are just getting started with virtualization make. Fibre (w

Re: [ovirt-users] gluster performance oVirt 3.4

2014-05-12 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Vadims Korsaks <tru...@inbox.lv> wrote: Underlying FS is XFS GlusterFS - glusterfs-3.5.0-2.el6 I'm using CentOS, if this is problem could RHEL packages be used? why CentOS packages are compiled without native glusterfs support? Citējot Paul Robert Marino &l

Re: [ovirt-users] gluster performance oVirt 3.4

2014-05-11 Thread Paul Robert Marino
What's the underlying filesystem for gluster is it XFS?What version of gluster are you using?What distro are you using and if its not RHEL or Fedora are you using a version of QEMU with gluster support compiled in keep in mind the versions with CentOS and Scientific Linux do not include Gluster nat