> Wait a minute.
>
> Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
> removed in a future update?
>
> What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
> backend supposed to use as a replacement?
>
They are to fully understand the opportunities and risks
I'm currently testing ceph with proxmox. Its taking 50Gb of ram for 21 OSDs so
yeah lets not compare it to gluster
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement:
HCI architectured virtualisation enviroments provide quite a lot of
benefits for different implementation scenarios. From rought point of view,
they combine 3 main components in horizontal scaling out fashion ( compute,
storage, networking)
As a starting point, i think you may want to have a look
What advantages does ovirt in hyperconerge mode offer over using glusterfs
on a separate stack unrelated to orvirt except as a domain storage? I am
looking into moving our NFS server to a distributed redundant solution.
What is the best, most reliable, fastest solution I could build that ovirt
can
I'm not so sure. Usually Gluster is used in Hyperconverged scenarios.CEPH is
more damanding and I would calculate my reaources several times before
considering it in Hyperconverged.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 0:01, Leo David wrote:
Ceph native usage (no iscis's or any other abstraction) will do the job and
elavate entire thing to a NEXT level.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 17:51 less foobar via Users wrote:
> I quote you from the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359
> Sandro Bonazzola 2022-02-07 06:42:27 UTC
>
>
I quote you from the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016359
Sandro Bonazzola 2022-02-07 06:42:27 UTC
(In reply to Nir Soffer from comment #4)
Is this relevant to oVirt? Do we plan to deprecate Gluster usage in oVirt?
The Gluster upstream website doesn't mention any intention to stop
I have had a lot of problems with gluster in my HCO environment, so was already
leanings towards a storage migration at some point this year. My own plan is to
use 2x Synology NAS SA3400 devices and put them into a HA pair that then
exposes the storage as NFS (or whatever else I want it exposed
Wait a minute.
Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
removed in a future update?
What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
backend supposed to use as a replacement?
I'm feeling vibes of the SPICE deprecation all over again. but
moving
So,we deprecate GlusterFS ? I understand it for RHV , but for oVirt, where
support was never an option, it doesn't make sense ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:43, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov
ha scritto:
Hi
This is the first time I hear that hyperconverged won't be supported in the
short future.
Since Ceph is supported by oVirt, wouldn't it be possible to use this for
hyperconverged deployments?
We are in the planning phase to buy servers for a typical 3 Gluster/Hosts
nodes deployment. Should we
Il giorno ven 4 feb 2022 alle ore 08:19 Strahil Nikolov <
hunter86...@yahoo.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> It seems that with
> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/commit/f3286b2e1f2871978d054250556f1b4f0eb7f09e#diff-41cf6794ba4200b839c53531555f0f3998df4cbb01a4d5cb0b94e3ca5e23947d
> all
12 matches
Mail list logo
