[ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs

Hello, I try use Gluster deploymont. I've the message error: failed: [llrovirttest02.in2p3.fr] (item={u'path': u'/gluster_bricks/engine', u'vgname': u'gluster_vg_sdb', u'lvname': u'gluster_lv_engine'}) => {"ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": false, "item": {"lvname": "gluster_lv_engine",

[ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs

Hello, I've some problem with Hyperconverged Configure Gluster storage and oVirt hosted engine. I've the message error: failed: [node2.x.fr] (item={u'key': u'gluster_vg_sdb', u'value': [{u'vgname': u'gluster_vg_sdb', u'pvname': u'/dev/sdb'}]}) => {"ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed":

[ovirt-users] Ovirt Glusterfs

Hi, How can I get the best performance when using Glusterfs as an oVirt Domain Storage? Thanks José -- Jose Ferradeira http://www.logicworks.pt ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org

[ovirt-users] oVirt + GlusterFS over FCoE

Hi community! Is it possibly to use oVirt with GlusterFS over FCoE with instruction https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/html-single/administration_guide/#How_to_Set_Up_RHVM_to_Use_FCoE?   ___ Users mailing list --

Re: [ovirt-users] oVIRT / GlusterFS / Data (HA)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Devin Acosta wrote: > > I have created an oVIRT 4.0.6 Cluster, it has 2 Compute nodes, and 3 > Dedicated Gluster nodes. The Gluster nodes are configured correctly and > they have the replica set to 3. I'm trying to figure out when I go to

[ovirt-users] oVIRT / GlusterFS / Data (HA)

I have created an oVIRT 4.0.6 Cluster, it has 2 Compute nodes, and 3 Dedicated Gluster nodes. The Gluster nodes are configured correctly and they have the replica set to 3. I'm trying to figure out when I go to attach the Data (Master) domain to the oVIRT manager what is the best method to do so

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:11:54AM +0200, Roderick Mooi wrote: > Hi > > > It is not removed. Can you try 'gluster volume set volname > > cluster.eager-lock enable`? > > This works. BTW by default this setting is “on” Thanks for reporting back! > What’s the difference between “on” and

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On 04/12/2016 02:41 PM, Roderick Mooi wrote: Hi It is not removed. Can you try 'gluster volume set volname cluster.eager-lock enable`? This works. BTW by default this setting is “on”. What’s the difference between “on” and “enable”? Both are identical. You can use any of the booleans to

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

Hi Ravi and colleagues (apologies for hijacking this thread but I’m not sure where else to report this (and it is related).) With gluster 3.7.10, running #gluster volume set group virt fails with: volume set: failed: option : eager-lock does not exist Did you mean eager-lock? I had to remove

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On 04/06/2016 02:08 PM, Roderick Mooi wrote: Hi Ravi and colleagues (apologies for hijacking this thread but I’m not sure where else to report this (and it is related).) With gluster 3.7.10, running #gluster volume set group virt fails with: volume set: failed: option : eager-lock does not

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

wow, that made a whole lot of difference! Thank you! [root@billjov1 ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile1 bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 20.2778 s, 51.7 MB/s these are the options now for the record. Options Reconfigured: cluster.server-quorum-type:

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On 02/12/2016 09:11 PM, Bill James wrote: wow, that made a whole lot of difference! Thank you! [root@billjov1 ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile1 bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 20.2778 s, 51.7 MB/s That's great. It was Vijay Bellur who noticed that it

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Bill James wrote: > thank you for the reply. > > We setup gluster using the names associated with NIC 2 IP. > Brick1: ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 > Brick2: ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 > Brick3:

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

don't know if it helps, but I ran a few more tests, all from the same hardware node. The VM: [root@billjov1 ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 62.5535 s, 16.8 MB/s Writing directly to gluster volume: [root@ovirt2 test

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

xml attached. On 02/11/2016 12:28 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Bill James wrote: thank you for the reply. We setup gluster using the names associated with NIC 2 IP. Brick1: ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 Brick2:

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

My apologies, I'm showing how much of a noob I am. Ignore last direct to gluster numbers, as that wasn't really glusterfs. [root@ovirt2 test ~]# mount -t glusterfs ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gv1 /mnt/tmp/ [root@ovirt2 test ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmp/testfile2 bs=1M count=1000

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

Hi Bill, Can you enable virt-profile setting for your volume and see if that helps? You need to enable this optimization when you create the volume using ovrit, or use the following command for an existing volume: #gluster volume set group virt -Ravi On 02/12/2016 05:22 AM, Bill James

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

thank you for the reply. We setup gluster using the names associated with NIC 2 IP. Brick1: ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 Brick2: ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 Brick3: ovirt3-ks.test.j2noc.com:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 That's NIC 2's IP. Using

[ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

I'm setting up a ovirt cluster using glusterfs and noticing not stellar performance. Maybe my setup could use some adjustments? 3 hardware nodes running centos7.2, glusterfs 3.7.6.1, ovirt 3.6.2.6-1. Each node has 8 spindles configured in 1 array which is split using LVM with one logical

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt glusterfs performance

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > +gluster-users > > Does disabling 'performance.write-behind' give a better throughput? > > > > On 02/10/2016 11:06 PM, Bill James wrote: >> >> I'm setting up a ovirt cluster using glusterfs and noticing not stellar >>