That would be really cool Jonathan.
The major reason i fear to take the multiple subscriptions route is due to
fears of performance degradation. If i can make do with a single
subscription, which performs better than equivalent multiple subscriptions,
i could connect more clients to one server (p
Just saw a this https://fedorahosted.org/moksha/
It uses Qpid, and allows you to create live widgets receiving data from
an AMQP broker. Uses that qpidd python client. One of the widgets allows
you to chat over via a web widget over AMQP, via qpidd to any IRC / XMPP
service.
Fun to see what
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping
needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some &
discussed.. want to help /contribute to it?
Carl.
I would be happy to help! Do you have discussions documented some
pl
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping
needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some & discussed..
want to help /contribute to it?
Carl.
I would be happy to help! Do you have discussions documented some place
for me to read?
Yes, that is correct, QMan goes from QMF to JMX. The reverse mapping
needs to be completed. Rafi and I have looked at it some & discussed..
want to help /contribute to it?
Carl.
Bryan Kearney wrote:
I was poking around the code, becuase I am interested in exposing an
EJB as a QMF Agent. I
I was just asked by someone how to set producer side flow control
simple, on qpidd set
--max-session-rate MESSAGES/S (0) Sets the maximum message
rate per session (0=unlimited)
if someone wants to do it on a per session basis it can be easily added
as an option via QMF.
Add to F
I was poking around the code, becuase I am interested in exposing an EJB
as a QMF Agent. In looking at the code, it appears that QMan is more
geard to exposing other agents to java code as JMX so as to build JMX
consoles. Is that correct? If so, has there been any work on exposing
Java Agents
Hi Stephen,
This is a problem in the java client that shipped with M4. It's fixed
in svn-trunk, if you need a workaround in the meantime, you can add
maxprefetch='1' to the broker connection string.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 16 Feb 2009, at 10:19, Stephen wrote:
Hi all
I suspect C++ broker does
Hello,
the C++ broker is compiling on ubuntu 7.10 (I should upgrade it in fact) and
I've the same problem with ubuntu 8.10. The problem comes in fact from you
g++ version. On ubuntu 7.10 we're using g++ 4.1 by default and on ubuntu
8.10 we're using g++4.3. So you should relink you /usr/bin/g++ (w
> I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some
> bench)marks
> and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID
> Java broker), the results are very good.
Great!
> I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've
> some blocking
> points. The first one is th
Gordon Sim wrote:
I think the simplest fix/change to address your need would be a
modification to the xml exchange to allow xqueries on headers only,
where the body is not itself xml.
I will do that - it means I have to detect statically whether the
message body is used in the query, but I th
>On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>no, we don't have a load from file utility. so options today are
qpi-config, via QMF or via AMQP
command set
Thanks for the reply Carl.
I do remember seeing something on QMF but command sets are new to me. Can
you please direct me to the app
ffrenchm wrote:
Hello,
I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some bench)marks
and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID Java broker), the
results are very good.
I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've some blocking
points. The first one is t
GS.Chandra N wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
For your purposes, it might be better to declare your own headers exchange
Thanks for the reply Tedd. I saw how to achieve this using qpid-config. Are
there any other ways, like declaring the required exchanges / que
GS.Chandra N wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The headers exchange only supports the limited mechanisms documented in
the 0-10 spec.
In that case, are there any ways to create Links between exchanges at the
server such that i can populate certain well known exchanges w
>On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> The headers exchange only supports the limited mechanisms documented in
the 0-10 spec.
In that case, are there any ways to create Links between exchanges at the
server such that i can populate certain well known exchanges with messages
corresp
Hi all
I suspect C++ broker does not receive the auto acknowledge message from Java.
I have a run a program like following:
Start C++ broker, with default settings
Start a Java consumer and listen to the C++ broker
The consumer session is AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE mode
Start a Java producer and send a te
GS.Chandra N wrote:
I'm trying to try out different ways of subscribing from header exchange.
Can i use SQL like syntax, as described in the standards draft?
The headers exchange only supports the limited mechanisms documented in
the 0-10 spec. You specify the key-value pairs you want to match
18 matches
Mail list logo
