Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid 0.26

2014-02-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 02/02/2014 10:48 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hello, all. RC4 [1][2] contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.26. If you favor releasing the RC4 bits as our official release, vote +1. If you have reason to believe RC4 is not ready for release, vote -1. +1, I am in favour of releasing this.

Bindings for Google's Dart language.

2014-02-04 Thread Steve Hamblett
Can be found here https://github.com/shamblett/amqp_client for the interested -- Talk is cheap. Show me the code. - Linus Torvalds Steve Hamblett

Re: A write up of some AMQP 1.0 Experiments

2014-02-04 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 21:08 +, Gordon Sim wrote: ... [...] However we could probably look at ways to (optionally?) make this more lenient. It certainly is also something that should be highlighted more prominently in documentation somehow. It would be *really really good* to be able

Re: Bindings for Google's Dart language.

2014-02-04 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 14:11 +, Steve Hamblett wrote: Can be found here https://github.com/shamblett/amqp_client for the interested This looks very cool. It's always fun to see amqp supporting new languages and projects. Is it in support of any specific project you'd like to share? The

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid 0.26

2014-02-04 Thread Ted Ross
+1 On 02/02/2014 05:48 PM, Justin Ross wrote: Hello, all. RC4 [1][2] contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.26. If you favor releasing the RC4 bits as our official release, vote +1. If you have reason to believe RC4 is not ready for release, vote -1. I will close this vote on Friday, 7

Re: A write up of some AMQP 1.0 Experiments

2014-02-04 Thread Fraser Adams
Thanks again for another update Gordon. Some responses inline below. On 03/02/14 21:08, Gordon Sim wrote: On 02/03/2014 07:53 PM, Fraser Adams wrote: On 03/02/14 15:38, Gordon Sim wrote: They should be set for outgoing messages as of 0.24[1]. What version were you using? I was actually

Re: A write up of some AMQP 1.0 Experiments

2014-02-04 Thread Fraser Adams
On 03/02/14 23:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: More of an observation/question for all, than reply to youFraser I noted the following while I was skimming: These sends resulted in the following messages from drain: 1. From Proton Messenger send:

Qpid website update

2014-02-04 Thread Justin Ross
Hi, everyone. I've got a pending website update up for review. http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/head/ There are a number of changes. I have summarized them below. Please take a look and tell me how it works for you. In particular, I'd be interested to know how it functions on any

Re: Qpid website update

2014-02-04 Thread Steve Huston
Cursory check on ipad looks good. On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do static analysis. -Steve On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote: Hi, everyone. I've got a pending website

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid 0.26

2014-02-04 Thread Keith W
+1. I retested my requested/approved RC4 change (QPID-5211). No issues encountered. On 4 February 2014 20:42, Shearer, Davin dshea...@novetta.com wrote: +1 -- Dynamic queue getting delete on close attribute set is working. Tested using proton v0.6 Messenger using both Python and C clients.