On 02/02/2014 10:48 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Hello, all. RC4 [1][2] contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.26.
If you favor releasing the RC4 bits as our official release, vote +1.
If you have reason to believe RC4 is not ready for release, vote -1.
+1, I am in favour of releasing this.
Can be found here https://github.com/shamblett/amqp_client for the
interested
--
Talk is cheap. Show me the code.
- Linus Torvalds
Steve Hamblett
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 21:08 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
...
[...]
However we could probably look at ways to (optionally?) make this more
lenient. It certainly is also something that should be highlighted
more prominently in documentation somehow.
It would be *really really good* to be able
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 14:11 +, Steve Hamblett wrote:
Can be found here https://github.com/shamblett/amqp_client for the
interested
This looks very cool. It's always fun to see amqp supporting new
languages and projects. Is it in support of any specific project you'd
like to share?
The
+1
On 02/02/2014 05:48 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
Hello, all. RC4 [1][2] contains the proposed final bits for Qpid 0.26.
If you favor releasing the RC4 bits as our official release, vote +1.
If you have reason to believe RC4 is not ready for release, vote -1.
I will close this vote on Friday, 7
Thanks again for another update Gordon. Some responses inline below.
On 03/02/14 21:08, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 02/03/2014 07:53 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
On 03/02/14 15:38, Gordon Sim wrote:
They should be set for outgoing messages as of 0.24[1]. What version
were you using?
I was actually
On 03/02/14 23:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
More of an observation/question for all, than reply to youFraser I
noted the following while I was skimming:
These sends resulted in the following messages from drain:
1. From Proton Messenger send:
Hi, everyone. I've got a pending website update up for review.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/transom/head/
There are a number of changes. I have summarized them below.
Please take a look and tell me how it works for you. In particular,
I'd be interested to know how it functions on any
Cursory check on ipad looks good.
On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention
Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do static analysis.
-Steve
On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, everyone. I've got a pending website
+1. I retested my requested/approved RC4 change (QPID-5211). No
issues encountered.
On 4 February 2014 20:42, Shearer, Davin dshea...@novetta.com wrote:
+1 -- Dynamic queue getting delete on close attribute set is working.
Tested using proton v0.6 Messenger using both Python and C clients.
10 matches
Mail list logo