Re: Does RH MRG End of Life have an Effect on QPID?

2014-12-08 Thread Alan Conway
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 15:13 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 12/05/2014 09:25 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I don't speak for Red Hat, but I can say that Red Hat != Apache Qpid. The > > Apache Qpid future is still bright with plenty of effort behind it on all > > the various facets (C+

Re: Does RH MRG End of Life have an Effect on QPID?

2014-12-08 Thread Gordon Sim
On 12/05/2014 09:25 PM, Steve Huston wrote: Hi Tom, I don't speak for Red Hat, but I can say that Red Hat != Apache Qpid. The Apache Qpid future is still bright with plenty of effort behind it on all the various facets (C++, Java, proton, dispatch, etc.) I don't speak for Red Hat in any offi

Re: In memory/embedded Java client testing

2014-12-08 Thread Alan Conway
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:17 +, Rob Godfrey wrote: > On 4 December 2014 at 01:13, Nathan Kunkee wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a project that successfully passes messages between Glassfish 4, > > Qpid 0.30 JCA adapter (see also the issues I logged), and RabbitMQ 3.3.4. I > > am now lookin

Re: landing proton engine examples on 'trunk'

2014-12-08 Thread Alan Conway
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 21:02 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > I believe it would be beneficial to land the examples I have been > evolving on the examples branch to the master. There is still some > internal work, the examples need some rationalisation and of course > feedback is still actively sought