RE: ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Randy Armstrong
I think it is related to proton because the exact same messages using the exact same credentials are processed by an AMQPlite client running at the same time. I am assuming it is related to how the message is constructed because an error that affected all ServiceBus clients should have been

Re: Gneral Question: Does QPID a message size limit?

2016-02-25 Thread Jakub Scholz
The C++ broker also doesn't have any problems with 10MB messages. we use them quite regularly (including persistence). I'm not 100% sure what is the maximal limit, but I usually start getting careful around 100MB. The reason for that is not always only the broker, but also the clients which need

RE: Gneral Question: Does QPID a message size limit?

2016-02-25 Thread Flores, Paul A.
Thanks Rob Anyone with some C++ specific information? From: Rob Godfrey [rob.j.godf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 4:20 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Gneral Question: Does QPID a message size limit? Each different component

Re: ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 21:16 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 25/02/16 16:01, Randy Armstrong wrote: > > > > [00B3D578]:0 <- @detach(22) [handle=0, closed=true, error=@error(29 > > ) > > [condition=:"amqp:unauthorized-access", description="Unauthorized > > access. > > 'Listen' claim(s) are required

RE: ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Randy Armstrong
In the function: pni_process_mechanisms(pn_transport_t *transport, const char *mechs) mechs = MSSBCBS PLAIN ANONYMOUS EXTERNAL transport->sasl->username and transport->sasl->password are correct. EXTERNAL is selected because it is first to be tested in the function. I changed the order so PLAIN

Re: Gneral Question: Does QPID a message size limit?

2016-02-25 Thread Rob Godfrey
Each different component of Qpid may have different limitations. As far as the Java Broker goes (and the Java AMQP 0-8/0-9/0-9-1/0-10 client - since they share a common underlying library) the theoretical message size limit is 2GB. By default the Java Broker rejects messages over 500MB in size,

Gneral Question: Does QPID a message size limit?

2016-02-25 Thread Flores, Paul A.
At a client site working on the adoption of QPID. The question that has been asked is if QPID can handle messages in the 10 MB size range. Is there a documented message size limit anywhere? Is the size system resource dependent? Thanks for your inputs it is welcomed and appreciated.

Re: ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Gordon Sim
On 25/02/16 16:01, Randy Armstrong wrote: [00B3D578]:0 <- @detach(22) [handle=0, closed=true, error=@error(29) [condition=:"amqp:unauthorized-access", description="Unauthorized access. 'Listen' claim(s) are required to perform this operation. Resource:

Re: ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Cliff Jansen
Thank-you for the additional information. It appears that you successfully create an SSL encrypted TCP connection acceptable to each peer. So SSL configuration seems fine. It further appears that the service bus refuses to create a link to your topic based on an unauthorized access attempt,

RE: General Question: Network Load Balanacing?

2016-02-25 Thread Steve Huston
Hi Paul, I work with a set of customers that set this kind of thing up as a set of meshed brokers with federation links that both load balances and acts as a mechanism of high availability. -Steve Huston > -Original Message- > From: Flores, Paul A. [mailto:paul.a.flo...@saic.com] >

General Question: Network Load Balanacing?

2016-02-25 Thread Flores, Paul A.
At a client site evaluating aspects of QPID for adoption for its use in a mission critical application. This is one question / area I was asked to elicit information regarding current capabilities, plans and alternatives. Has anyone looked at either the distributed broker functionality and

Re: Qpid Subversion reorganization proposal

2016-02-25 Thread Gordon Sim
On 24/02/16 19:03, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 06:15 -0800, Justin Ross wrote: ... This actually goes quite far beyond what I was expecting before the upcoming cpp etc releases, looks like you have been busy! :) Seconded - I'm really impressed with how far you have taken

ServiceBus and Proton-C 0.12 IOP Issue

2016-02-25 Thread Randy Armstrong
I am using the "recv" example from the 0.12 codebase. The URL I am using is: amqps://receiver:@opcfoundation-prototyping.servicebus.windows.net/MyTopic/Subscriptions/ default" I have tried with pn_messenger_set_flags(messenger, PN_FLAGS_ALLOW_INSECURE_MECHS); and

Re: Help with Dispatch Build "difficulties" - new issue

2016-02-25 Thread Alan Conway
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 13:52 -0500, Ken Giusti wrote: > Hrm - where did libqpid-proton-cpp.* files come from?  I don't > recognize any proton library that has that -cpp suffix. Those are the new C++ binding, which I think implies you have installed proton 12.0 or master at some point as they

Re: Frame too large for buffer

2016-02-25 Thread Gordon Sim
On 25/02/16 12:34, Filipe Santos wrote: Hi I’m experiencing the error “Frame too large for buffer.” from Qpid broker version 0.32. This was already discussed here last April and the following issue was raised: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6501 Does anyone knows if this is

RE: Help -> QPID Proton 12.0 build error!

2016-02-25 Thread Flores, Paul A.
FYI: I am able to successfully compile qpid-proton0.11.1 with absolutely no issues /problems. From: Flores, Paul A. [paul.a.flo...@saic.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:29 AM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: RE: Help -> QPID Proton 12.0 build

RE: Help -> QPID Proton 12.0 build error!

2016-02-25 Thread Flores, Paul A.
It is not a compiler directive that is at the root cause of this error message as it is persistent. It is not the gcc compiler version (gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-55)). When I do a "make -k" I see a large number of warnings, granted most have to do with the generation of

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Qpid Java 6.0.1

2016-02-25 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
There were 5 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed. Voting thread: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Qpid-Java-6-0-1-RC3-td7638867.html I am going to publish release artifacts into dist release repo and maven repo. After that I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Java 6.0.1 (RC3)

2016-02-25 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
There were 5 binding and 1 non-binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed. Kind Regards, Alex On 22 February 2016 at 11:51, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I created a new 6.0.1 RC3 build containing a fix for a blocker: > > QPID-6817 - [Java

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Java 6.0.1 (RC3)

2016-02-25 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 On 22 February 2016 at 11:51, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I created a new 6.0.1 RC3 build containing a fix for a blocker: > > QPID-6817 - [Java Broker] On abrupt connection close from client side when > Broker is delivering messages to consumer, the delivering

Frame too large for buffer

2016-02-25 Thread Filipe Santos
Hi I'm experiencing the error "Frame too large for buffer." from Qpid broker version 0.32. This was already discussed here last April and the following issue was raised: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6501 Does anyone knows if this is already fixed for version 0.34? Or will it be

Re: Help -> QPID Proton 12.0 build error!

2016-02-25 Thread TRUFANOW Alexandre
If you want to disable the c++ binding, you can use the cmake flag -DBUILD_CPP=FALSE. Alexandre On mer., 2016-02-24 at 22:11 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I'd expected the error message and context (older OS/compiler) being > the same might make it applicable. > > Its building the C++ binding