RE: Any way to do consumer flow control with Proton C++?

2016-09-06 Thread Jeff Donner
Whooops, spoke too soon - it looks like this is explicitly supported in 0.14.0. Sorry for the noise. Jeff From: Jeff Donner [jdon...@morphodetection.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:13 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Any way to do consumer f

Any way to do consumer flow control with Proton C++?

2016-09-06 Thread Jeff Donner
Hi, Is there any way to do consumer-side flow control from Proton C++? I'm currently using 0.12.1, but I don't see anything different from what I did below even in 0.14.0. I added the following lines to the example simple_recv.cpp 's on_message() handler, std::cout << "received; c

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid C++ 1.35.0 released

2016-09-06 Thread Justin Ross
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Apache Qpid C++ 1.35.0. Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) is a cross-platform enterprise messaging solution which implements the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP, http://www.amqp.org). It provides message brok

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid JMS client 0.11.0

2016-09-06 Thread Timothy Bish
+1 * Reviewed the source and binary distribution files * Checked license and notice files * Validated Signatures and Checksums * Built from the source distributions and ran the tests. * Tested an ActiveMQ 5.x broker using the staged artifacts * Ran the example against an existing ActiveMQ 5.x bro

[proton-j] Connections per client

2016-09-06 Thread Hudalla Kai (INST/ESY1)
Hi, I have implemented an AMQP 1.0 server on top of vertx-proton (using proton-j under the hood). When I connect to the server, I get the impression that the server will only accept and establish a single connection per client (identified by IP address/port). Is that right, and is this configurab

Re: Python binding without libqpid-proton dependency

2016-09-06 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 09:26 +0200, Volker Diels-Grabsch wrote: > Hi Gordon, Ken, > > Thanks for your useful explainations.  Neither of them solved my > problem fully, but the combination did. :-) Here is a relatively simple procedure for building a python package like you describe from the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid JMS client 0.11.0

2016-09-06 Thread Gordon Sim
On 05/09/16 16:47, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Hi folks, I have put together a spin for a 0.11.0 Qpid JMS client release, please test it and vote accordingly. +1 (verified signature, compiled and ran tests, ran helloworld example against both brokers, the router and the proton python broker.py exam

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid JMS client 0.11.0

2016-09-06 Thread Jakub Scholz
+1 ... I took the staged artifacts and run my tests against different versions of Qpid C++ broker (0.34, 1.35 and master) and Red Hat MRG-M 3.2. All seems to work OK. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have put together a spin for a 0.11.0 Qpid JMS client rel