[VOTE] Release Qpid Python 1.36.0

Hi, everyone. This our first release candidate for the Qpid Python 1.36.0 release. Please test in your environment, report what you find, and then vote to approve or reject the release. Source distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/python/1.36.0-rc1/ Tag: https://git-wip-us.a

[HEADS UP] proton-j-0.18.0 and qpid-jms-0.21.0

Hi folks, just a note that I will be looking at doing a proton-j 0.18.0 release nearer the start of next week, and following up later with a qpid-jms 0.21.0 release using it if all goes well. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user

Re: [Qpid Dispatch - 0.7.0] Random failure on unit test "system_tests_link_routes" on Linux

Great! I had stumbled on this issue by coincidence while debugging another one on Solaris. It might be useful to execute the unit tests multiple times on the CI to detect such random issues. It's what we are currently doing and it had revealed some bugs for us over time. Regards, Adel __

Re: [Qpid Dispatch - 0.7.0] Random failure on unit test "system_tests_link_routes" on Linux

Hi Adel, We found the reason the test was failing. I have entered a JIRA for this - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-646 The fix to this problem is not straightforward. We are still discussing this. This only affects drain processing on link routes. This test can be reproduced

Re: Performance degradation with Qpid JMS Client 0.20.0

This should be fixed now and will be part of the next release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-269 On 03/01/2017 12:29 PM, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: Hi Tim, Please find attached a sample application testing transaction throughput for one publishing and one consuming connections. By

Re: JavaScript version of Proton?

Hey Paul, No worries, you didn't come across as being dismissive at all, it was more the comment about "pure-JavaScript" that I wanted to clarify - asm.js doesn't *require* specific support (other than a JavaScript runtime that supports ArrayBuffers) so although it's not exactly what you'd ma

Re: JavaScript version of Proton?

On 3 March 2017 at 11:22, Paul wrote: > Hi Frase, > > Sorry if I came off as dismissing the Emscripten approach: I was just > looking for something written directly/natively in JavaScript instead of > cross-compiled C code, based on how things were worded on the website. > > And I'm also not sayin

Re: JavaScript version of Proton?

Hi Frase, Sorry if I came off as dismissing the Emscripten approach: I was just looking for something written directly/natively in JavaScript instead of cross-compiled C code, based on how things were worded on the website. And I'm also not saying that one is better than the other: the benefi

Re: JavaScript version of Proton?

Hello Paul, I contributed the emscripten based proton JavaScript binding a while back. 1. Re: "The only think I can find are JavaScript bindings that are cross-compiled from the C version using Emscripten: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/tree/master/proton-c/bindings/javascript That d

RE: Configuring addresses starting with '/' on qpid-dispatch router 0.7.0

Hello, Do you have an idea on the below behavior? Thank you, Regards, Antoine -Original Message- From: Antoine Chevin [mailto:antoine.che...@gmail.com] Sent: jeudi 2 mars 2017 10:43 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Configuring addresses starting with '/' on qpid-dispatch router 0.7.0

RE: Accessing queues with '/' in name in Rest API [qpid java broker 6.0.4]

Hello Rob, We gave a try ot the globalAddressDomains and it works fine. I think we will use regular queue names and globalAddressDomains for our use case. Thank you! Do you know if the broker federation is planned for v7? Regards, Antoine -Original Message- From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob