This should be fixed now and will be part of the next release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-269
On 03/01/2017 12:29 PM, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
Hi Tim,
Please find attached a sample application testing transaction
throughput for one publishing and one consuming connections.
By running it on my machine I see a difference in performance of ~15%
between 0.11.0 and 0.20.0.
Our performance test suite uses 10 publishing and 10 consuming
connections. The difference in performance is a bit bigger with it.
Btw, you can run the suite from qpid-java project using
mvn integration-test -f ./perftests/pom.xml -DskipTests=true \
-Dperftests=qpid-jms-client -Dqpid.disttest.duration=20000 \
-Dperftests.hillclimb=true -Dperftests.hillclimb.minimum_delta=100
-Dperftests.hillclimb.max_runs=2 \
-Dperftests.test-config=./perftests/etc/testdefs \
-Dqpid-jms-client-version=0.11.0 \
/// <--- parameters below are default values and can be skipped
-Dperftests.messaging-hostport-plain=localhost:5672 \
-Dperftests.messaging-hostport-tls=localhost:5671 \
-Dperftests.messaging-user=guest \
-Dperftests.messaging-password=guest \
-Dperftests.broker-virtualhostnode=default \
-Dperftests.broker-virtualhost=default \
-Dperftests.manangement-url=http://localhost:8080 \
-Dperftests.manangement-user=guest \
-Dperftests.manangement-password=guest \
-Dperftests.broker-virtualhostnode=default
The basic authentication needs to be enabled on http port in order to
run the suite. The suite contains 2 transaction and 2 auto ack tests.
Only transactions tests are affected. The difference in performance
for Auto ack is unnoticeable.
Potentially you can comment auto-ack tests in
./perftests/etc/testdefs/defaultTests.js and run only transaction
tests.
Kind Regards,
Alex
On 28 February 2017 at 17:04, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/28/2017 08:10 AM, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
Hi all,
After upgrading Qpid JMS Client from version 0.11.0 to version 0.20.0
our performance test results dropped approximately on 20-25% in the
performance tests testing transaction performance with trunk version
of Qpid Java Broker.
Changing client back to v0.11.0 and re-running the tests yields me the
same results as before the upgrade.
What changes on the client could be the reason for a performance drop?
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
