Greetings,
I observe following messages from qpidd in /var/log/messages:
qpidd: 2017-11-29 13:11:47 [Network] error
qpid.10.1.1.11:5672-10.1.1.1:65355 connection failed: transport error:
amqp:resource-limit-exceeded, local-idle-timeout expired
I assume these messages are generated when open
+1
- Original Message -
> From: "Alan Conway"
> To: "Andrew Stitcher" , "Clifford Jansen"
> , "Justin Ross"
> , "Gordon Sim" , users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 2:34:28
On 28/11/17 19:34, Alan Conway wrote:
I noticed a discrepancy on how PN_DELIVERY is handled by different bindings
1. C++ - if (link is locally closed and auto_accept is set) { release the
message } else { call on_message }
2. Python - if (link is locally closed) { if (auto_accept is set)
I noticed a discrepancy on how PN_DELIVERY is handled by different bindings
1. C++ - if (link is locally closed and auto_accept is set) { release the
message } else { call on_message }
2. Python - if (link is locally closed) { if (auto_accept is set) release
the message} else call on_message
3.
On 28/11/17 16:52, andi welchlin wrote:
I could do it without a key like:
qpid-route route add localhost:9001 localhost:9002 ex ''
But will this lead to defined behaviour? With a key given which is empty?
For a topic exchange that will I think only match where the routing key
is also an
On 28/11/17 16:48, andi welchlin wrote:
Thank you, Gordon. It works.
Is it possible to set the route without any key? I do not need it but I had
to give it a key, otherwise the qpid-route utility exits with usage output:
You could try with '#' (which means everything on a topic exchange). (If
I could do it without a key like:
qpid-route route add localhost:9001 localhost:9002 ex ''
But will this lead to defined behaviour? With a key given which is empty?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:19 PM, andi welchlin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to create a route between
Thank you, Gordon. It works.
Is it possible to set the route without any key? I do not need it but I had
to give it a key, otherwise the qpid-route utility exits with usage output:
-
qpid-route route add localhost:9001 localhost:9002 ex
Usage: qpid-route
On 28/11/17 16:19, andi welchlin wrote:
Hello,
I tried to create a route between exchanges. When I sent a message to the
exchange on the first broker I did not get the message when I tried to read
from the second broker.
What I did is simple:
- Startet two qpid daemons one on port 9001 and
Hello,
I tried to create a route between exchanges. When I sent a message to the
exchange on the first broker I did not get the message when I tried to read
from the second broker.
What I did is simple:
- Startet two qpid daemons one on port 9001 and one on port 9002.
- qpid-config -b
Hi
The broker and client behaviours are fully compliant with "Using the
Anonymous Terminus for Message Routing" [1].
It conforms the requirements of section "2.2.2 Routing Errors". For
the cases, when destination cannot be resolved
{quote}
If the source of the link supports the rejected outcome,
11 matches
Mail list logo