Re: Unexpected idle timeout behaviours

2024-03-15 Thread Ciaran
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 8:03 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > > I'm glad you got to the bottom of it, thank you for bearing with me. I > can > > run a parallel compile for > > my purposes, but I was wondering if there is a planned release date for > M20 > > ? > > > > Thank you. > > > No planned date as

Re: ProtonJ2 client handling of null message bodies

2024-03-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 3/15/24 15:42, Ciaran wrote: On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:14 PM Timothy Bish wrote: On 3/15/24 11:50, Ciaran wrote: Hi, I'm attempting to build a resilient client using the protonj2 client and as part of my testing I was checking that it would handle messages with null bodies

Re: Unexpected idle timeout behaviours

2024-03-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 3/15/24 15:44, Ciaran wrote: This should be fixed no in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2807 This essentially occurred because the Proton buffers were rewritten to allow zero copy semantics after the ingest code was written and the read offset is no longer reflective

Re: Unexpected idle timeout behaviours

2024-03-15 Thread Ciaran
> > > > > > This should be fixed no in: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2807 > > > > This essentially occurred because the Proton buffers were rewritten to > > allow zero copy semantics after the ingest code was written and the read > > offset is no longer reflective of the

Re: ProtonJ2 client handling of null message bodies

2024-03-15 Thread Ciaran
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:14 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 3/15/24 11:50, Ciaran wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm attempting to build a resilient client using the protonj2 client and > as > > part of my testing I was checking that it would handle messages with null > > bodies (specifically my client is

Re: ProtonJ2 client handling of null message bodies

2024-03-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 3/15/24 11:50, Ciaran wrote: Hi, I'm attempting to build a resilient client using the protonj2 client and as part of my testing I was checking that it would handle messages with null bodies (specifically my client is only willing to work with strings or byte arrays so it rejects any other

Re: Unexpected idle timeout behaviours

2024-03-15 Thread Timothy Bish
On 3/14/24 19:28, Ciaran wrote: I've provided the full set of frames below, but if I'm interpreting correctly the inputSequence property is not being incremented on receipt of data which means that the deadline for hearing from the peer again is not being suitably increased. (I can see the

ProtonJ2 client handling of null message bodies

2024-03-15 Thread Ciaran
Hi, I'm attempting to build a resilient client using the protonj2 client and as part of my testing I was checking that it would handle messages with null bodies (specifically my client is only willing to work with strings or byte arrays so it rejects any other AMQP message body type). However,

RE: [QPID PROTON PYTHON] How to send messages in loop within the same link or connection.

2024-03-15 Thread Richard Sylvain
Hi Ted. Thank you so much! It's working fine with this timer. Sylvain -Original Message- From: Ted Ross Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 4:41 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: [QPID PROTON PYTHON] How to send messages in loop within the same link or connection. Richard, If