I have pushed updates for the site and its related release scripts etc now.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 17:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I have still to update the site itself, but I did take care of
> removing its repository master branch entirely with Infra's assistance
> (i.e. it has no 'main' bran
I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21667 to ask for
Infra to remove the qpid-proton repository 'master' branch protection
so that I could delete its accidentally-recreated master, which is now
done.
Can any committers that have not yet done so please ensure you update
your local
I have still to update the site itself, but I did take care of
removing its repository master branch entirely with Infra's assistance
(i.e. it has no 'main' branch replacement, only asf-site is left now)
.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 14:00, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I believe I have now updated the Je
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:06 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I believe I have now updated the Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Travis
> CI job configs as needed to reflect the branch changes for the various
> repos. I updated various references in READMEs and instructions etc to
> cover the changes also.
I believe I have now updated the Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Travis
CI job configs as needed to reflect the branch changes for the various
repos. I updated various references in READMEs and instructions etc to
cover the changes also.
The website still needs work done to update things, I'll hopefu
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 09:29, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> The remaining repositories have now had their default branches renamed
> from master to main, following the earlier test change.
>
> If you have an existing clone of a repo, you either need to re-clone
> it, or manually update your local repo
No worries, very easy thing to happen without exact coordination.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 12:13, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
>
> Hi Robbie,
> Thanks for branch removal.
> My apologies, I have not checked the state of the repo before the commit.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 10:31,
Hi Robbie,
Thanks for branch removal.
My apologies, I have not checked the state of the repo before the commit.
Kind Regards,
Alex
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 10:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Infra removed the protection from master for me and I have now removed
> the branch again.
>
> (The same prot
Infra removed the protection from master for me and I have now removed
the branch again.
(The same protection remains for all the other repositories for now,
it will be removed if actually needed).
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 10:21, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> I see that qpid-broker-j was being worked
I see that qpid-broker-j was being worked on over the precise period
the renames were being done, and so has unfortunately already had the
master branch re-created by a push.
I've brought the main up to date with the change, but I cant delete
the old master branch as its protected from being rewou
The remaining repositories have now had their default branches renamed
from master to main, following the earlier test change.
If you have an existing clone of a repo, you either need to re-clone
it, or manually update your local repo to ensure it reflects the
branch name change.
For the latter t
The qpid-jms repo has now had its branch renamed as an initial test.
Per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21589, I have checked
things over, updated the Jenkins jobs as needed and checked others.
The repo seems fine, though there were a couple of small unexpected
things in the process I
I was going to begin this tomorrow as noted below, however since I
sent this proposal I have now been both on the receiving end of a
GitHub-driven rename and done some of them for myself...that is, doing
the rename with their tooling as described at
https://github.com/github/renaming.
It is a nice
+1
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 12:22, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose renaming our git repository default branches
> from "master" to "main" in keeping with general efforts to remove
> offensive language, and also aligning with it being the default naming
> approach on
+1
If you hit any issues please update here. As I’m also doing the same in
Artemis
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 1:08 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
> +1
>
> On 3/11/21 7:21 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I would like to propose renaming our git repository default branches
> > from "master"
+1
On 3/11/21 7:21 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to propose renaming our git repository default branches
from "master" to "main" in keeping with general efforts to remove
offensive language, and also aligning with it being the default naming
approach on new repositories in va
+1 Thanks for planning this. --Chuck
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 7:21:55 AM
> Subject: [DISCUSS/NOTICE] Renaming default git repo branches to "main"
>
> Hi folks,
>
&g
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:28 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose renaming our git repository default branches
> from "master" to "main" in keeping with general efforts to remove
> offensive language, and also aligning with it being the default naming
> approach on new
Hi folks,
I would like to propose renaming our git repository default branches
from "master" to "main" in keeping with general efforts to remove
offensive language, and also aligning with it being the default naming
approach on new repositories in various places for some time now.
Having looked i
19 matches
Mail list logo
