Leglise Yann wrote:
Hello Robert,
I am not particulary trying to create queues dynamically. I am in fact trying to
determine if by using the JMS QPID implementation leads to an AMQP compliant behaviour. I
mean, by using JMS, as soon as a use a consumer on an non-existing queue, this queue is
compliant.
Regards.
Yann LEGLISE
-Message d'origine-
De : Robert Greig [mailto:robert.j.gr...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 août 2009 20:13
À : users@qpid.apache.org
Objet : Re: Mixing up AMQP QPID and JMS
2009/8/19 Leglise Yann :
> 2) If it is, are both implementations equiva
2009/8/19 Leglise Yann :
> 2) If it is, are both implementations equivalent and compliant with AMQP the
> same way? I am asking because using JMS, when you create a Consumer on a
> queue that is not declared as an administered object, this queue is created
> in the broker.
This isn't generally
Leglise Yann wrote:
Hello once again :)
Here are some additional questions arisen from your answers.
1) As there are java example that does not make use of JMS objects, I suppose
that QPID also furnish another AMQP implementation that is independent from JMS?
Yes, there is also a "low leve
declared, what I understood by "if queues
are not explicitly declared, they cannot be used".
Thank you.
Best regards
-Message d'origine-
De : Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 août 2009 17:22
À : users@qpid.apache.org
Objet : Re: Mixing up AMQP QPID a
Leglise Yann wrote:
Thank you Gordon.
Your answers helped, but I want to make it a little bit clearer about the
relation between QPID and JMS.
I can only see 2 possible interpretation of the relation between JMS and QPID
(one will necessarily be wrong):
1) QPID relies on (i.e. make use of) a
:g...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 août 2009 16:11
À : users@qpid.apache.org
Objet : Re: Mixing up AMQP QPID and JMS
Leglise Yann wrote:
> Hello,
Hello!
> I had sent a previous mail in the beginning of July concerning an AMQP
> version problem between client and broker.
> It is OK f
Leglise Yann wrote:
Hello,
Hello!
I had sent a previous mail in the beginning of July concerning an AMQP version
problem between client and broker.
It is OK for this point, but now I am realizing that the things are still not
so clear for me.
Here are some assertions I believe as being true
Hello,
I had sent a previous mail in the beginning of July concerning an AMQP version
problem between client and broker.
It is OK for this point, but now I am realizing that the things are still not
so clear for me.
Here are some assertions I believe as being true (please tell me if I am wrong)