Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-20 Thread Fraser Adams
On 19/11/13 20:30, Andrew Stitcher wrote: # Build the JavaScript language binding. # This is somewhat different to the other language bindings in that it does not use swig. It uses a C/C++ to # JavaScript cross-compiler called emscripten (https://github.com/kripken/emscripten). Emscripten takes C

Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-20 Thread Fraser Adams
On 19/11/13 20:18, Ted Ross wrote: Frase, This looks really interesting. Can you provide any details about the WebSockets encapsulation (i.e. how WS messages and frames are used)? Thanks, -Ted Hi Ted, thanks for the response. I'm not really sure what you are getting at with your question,

RE: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Steve Huston
+2 :-) > -Original Message- > From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:38 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation. > > +1 > > I'd be very interested in se

RE: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Steve Huston
raser Adams [mailto:fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:56 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation. > > Hey all, > For the last couple of weekends I've been working on a Proof of Concept >

Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Ted Ross
+1 I'd be very interested in seeing this checked in on a branch. -Ted On 11/19/2013 03:33 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: I think its worth mentioning that branches are ideally suited to this sort of workwhether it actually ends up on trunk or not in the end, theres no need to keep things local

Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I think its worth mentioning that branches are ideally suited to this sort of workwhether it actually ends up on trunk or not in the end, theres no need to keep things local until it is actually ready for landing on trunk... Robbie On 19 November 2013 19:56, Fraser Adams wrote: > Hey all, >

Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 19:56 +, Fraser Adams wrote: > Hey all, > For the last couple of weekends I've been working on a Proof of Concept > JavaScript implementation of Proton. > > The approach that I've taken is (I think) quite interesting/unusual but > it's an approach that offers a high lev

Re: Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Ted Ross
Frase, This looks really interesting. Can you provide any details about the WebSockets encapsulation (i.e. how WS messages and frames are used)? Thanks, -Ted On 11/19/2013 02:56 PM, Fraser Adams wrote: Hey all, For the last couple of weekends I've been working on a Proof of Concept JavaSc

Proof of Concept JavaScript Proton implementation.

2013-11-19 Thread Fraser Adams
Hey all, For the last couple of weekends I've been working on a Proof of Concept JavaScript implementation of Proton. The approach that I've taken is (I think) quite interesting/unusual but it's an approach that offers a high level of synergy with implementations for other languages that are