> I have these types of machines available if you decide to pursue this
> effort and want help porting it.
>
Would be happy to help you. I'm currently subscribing to the dev list so
then we will have some discussions in it :)
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/QPid-C%2B
> I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some
> bench)marks
> and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID
> Java broker), the results are very good.
Great!
> I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've
> some blocking
> points. The first one is th
ffrenchm wrote:
Hello,
I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some bench)marks
and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID Java broker), the
results are very good.
I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've some blocking
points. The first one is t
Hello,
I'm very optimistic about QPID C++ broker. I already did some bench)marks
and comparing to other queuer (like ActiveMQ or also QPID Java broker), the
results are very good.
I would be so very happy to use it in my project. But I've some blocking
points. The first one is the portability on
