, 2013 1:04:17 PM
Subject: Re: survey: c++ broker and queue depth statistics
On 09/27/2013 11:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well
as
the number of messages.
For 0-10 the bytes statistic is calculated by aggregating only the
content
I would vote for (c) option.
Gordon Sim wrote
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well as
the number of messages.
For 0-10 the bytes statistic is calculated by aggregating only the
content size (i.e. the size of the body segment). For 1.0 it is the
whole
I vote c. It is an improvement in behaviour.
On 09/27/2013 06:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well as the
number of messages.
For 0-10 the bytes statistic is calculated by aggregating only the content size
(i.e. the size of the body
: c++ broker and queue depth statistics
On 09/27/2013 11:47 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well as
the number of messages.
For 0-10 the bytes statistic is calculated by aggregating only the
content size (i.e. the size of the body segment
On 09/27/2013 12:52 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
Assuming there are no plans to abandon AMQP 0.10, I would say that in my
opinion the option c) is worth the effort both on Qpid side as well as for
the users side. The option d) seems to be unnecessary. At least with our
use cases we never plan the
c.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 6:47 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: survey: c++ broker and queue depth statistics
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well as the
number of
