RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-08 Thread Paolo Patierno
To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10 > Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:16:31 + > > Now it seems to work but with a little bit change inside Qpid Proton C > library ... > As I said the in "pni_process_mechanisms" function, the SASL m

RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-02 Thread Paolo Patierno
t order between EXTERNAL check and PLAIN check. What do you think about that ? Thanks,Paolo. Paolo PatiernoSenior Software Engineer Windows Embedded & IoTMicrosoft Azure Insider Twitter : @ppatierno Linkedin : paolopatierno Blog : DevExperienceBlog : Embedded101 > From: ppatie...@live.com &g

RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-02 Thread Paolo Patierno
and 0.10 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 20:52:50 +0200 Yes Gordon ... You are right I'm speaking about messenger APIs Sent from my Windows Phone From: Gordon Sim Sent: ‎01/‎09/‎2015 20:39 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10 On 09/0

RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Paolo Patierno
Yes Gordon ... You are right I'm speaking about messenger APIs Sent from my Windows Phone From: Gordon Sim<mailto:g...@redhat.com> Sent: ‎01/‎09/‎2015 20:39 To: users@qpid.apache.org<mailto:users@qpid.apache.org> Subject: Re: SASL mechanism differ

Re: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Gordon Sim
On 09/01/2015 07:29 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: You may have to modify the send example I suspect this is the send example using the messenger API. Is there a way to control the mechanisms used with that API? - To unsubscrib

Re: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Andrew Stitcher
Is there any chance you could use a mail application (or setting for this one) that respects the message-id of messages you reply to and adds a correct "references" header? Your messages keep on breaking up the threading of messages for me (and for many other people I'd wager). On Tue, 2015-09-01

RE: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Paolo Patierno
message without any other feature related to client authentication. Thanks Paolo Sent from my Windows Phone From: Andrew Stitcher<mailto:astitc...@redhat.com> Sent: ‎01/‎09/‎2015 18:26 To: users@qpid.apache.org<mailto:users@qpid.apache.org> Subject: Re:

Re: SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 14:32 +, Paolo Patierno wrote: > Hi all, > I noticed the following difference between 0.9.1 and 0.10 and I'm not > able to use Qpid Proton C 0.10 for sending messages to Azure Service > Bus (a queue for example). You don't say whether you are using Proton-C 0.10 on Window

SASL mechanism different between 0.9.1 and 0.10

2015-09-01 Thread Paolo Patierno
Hi all,I noticed the following difference between 0.9.1 and 0.10 and I'm not able to use Qpid Proton C 0.10 for sending messages to Azure Service Bus (a queue for example).The endpoint is the same for both : amqps://:@.servicebus.windows.net/q1 I'm using the "send" example in the Proton solution