Hello
Am 2015-05-19 um 14:16 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator:
Hi,
I have tested the free busy feature with the following setup:
user A invites users B and C.
In the SOGo Interface, A sees the free busy time of B but not of C.
B and C share a team calendar, and both have
Hello
Am 2015-05-18 um 21:40 schrieb sattellite:
I couldn't find answers to your questions in this mailing and the
FAQ. I
Our question? ;-)
Sorry. I forgot to fix a typo after got text from online translator. English
is
not my native language.
No problem, found it funny.
В Четверг, 21 май. 2015 в 12:10 , Christian Mack
christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de написал:
This is per design, because those list can get quite big.
Great thanks. But this behavior is very-very strange from user-side
(user experience: I want see all contacts by default when opening
contact
+1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie.
Thanks!
El Miércoles, 20 de mayo, 2015 20:02:21, Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca escribió:
On 20/05/2015 20:22, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Not yet a stable build?
Because SOGo v2.3.0 is not released.
Why?
Because there's virtually *no*
When there's less than 4 Gigabytes of RAM, the empirical evidence I have is
that an x86 distributtion offers a better performance than an amd64 one. For
deployments of light load or simple exploration environments, it could be
convenient also, taking advantage of existing hardware available
SOHO: using my hardware as long as it does what i want it to do like i
want it to do. and small groups don't need big hardware.
Thanx to all of you for your great work!
J. Feldner
__
Am 21.05.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Tanstaafl:
On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J.
On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
+1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie.
Why on earth would anyone intentionally run an i386 version of anything
on a server today???
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Title: BTS activities for Thursday, May 21 2015
BTS Activities
Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
Project: SOGo
For the period covering: Thursday, May 21 2015
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
Am 21.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Zhang Huangbin:
On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support
ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with
little to no effort)...
On 21/05/2015 15:38, André Schild wrote:
- You have to make the scripts
Checked.
- The builds can break for whatever reason
s/can/always/
- There might be 32/64Bit issues which need tracking,debugging,fixing
s/might be/are always/
Ludo
--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca ::
On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support
ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with
little to no effort)...
Just curious, does SOGo team build packages
On 5/21/2015 10:41 AM, Zhang Huangbin z...@iredmail.org wrote:
On May 21, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J.
rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote:
As far as I know the naming of the Debian port depends on the
underlying microprocessor architecture. In https://www.debian.org/ports/
the
Hello
This should not be empty.
How did that happen?
Kind regards,
Christian Mack
Am 2015-05-11 um 16:09 schrieb Maxime RUBINO:
I have found the problem and i'm idiot :
the directory SSL.bundle is empty ?!
---
Hello Christian,
the location is correct :
root@sogo:/# find / |
13 matches
Mail list logo
