Re: [SOGo] Deleting an event from web calendar doesn't work

On 20-09-10 20:34, Martijn Grendelman wrote: > Running the SOGo 1.3.0.20100920 nightly build on Debian Lenny, I can't > seem to delete events from the web calendar. If I select the event, > right-click it and select 'delete', nothing happens. > > Sniffing the netw

[SOGo] Deleting an event from web calendar doesn't work

Hi, Running the SOGo 1.3.0.20100920 nightly build on Debian Lenny, I can't seem to delete events from the web calendar. If I select the event, right-click it and select 'delete', nothing happens. Sniffing the network traffic between Apache and SOGo confirms that indeed nothing happens; there are

Re: [SOGo] Synchronizing tasks

On 13-09-10 15:35, Clay Wright wrote: > On 09/13/2010 06:59 AM, Martijn Grendelman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm not sure if this is a SOGo or Funambol issue, but maybe someone here >> has run into the same issue. >> >> I am trying to synchronize SOGo task

[SOGo] Bind to IPv6 address

Hi, In the FAQ [1] there is an entry about how one can bind SOGo to a particular IP address, like this: WOPort = "1.2.3.4:2"; Is it possible to bind SOGo to an IPv6 address, and if so, how would one specify it? I tried the Apache-way, like this: WOPort = "[2001:470:1f15:a1e::10]:2"

[SOGo] Synchronizing tasks

Hi, I'm not sure if this is a SOGo or Funambol issue, but maybe someone here has run into the same issue. I am trying to synchronize SOGo tasks from/to my mobile (a Nokia N900 running Maemo). If I add a task through the SOGo web interface, it is synced to my phone. However, any changes I make on

Re: [SOGo] Question about database tables

Hi, > I too use SMime for signing my mails. (They are not encrypted, just signed) > >> So, some solutions: >> - the list server does not attach a footer anymore, or > > Yep, that would be a good idea, or attach it in the non-signed part... According to the documentation of SOGo's MLM (Sympa), i

[SOGo] Question about database tables (resend)

[ Resent the mail, without S/MIME signature ] Hi, Back in January, I posted a message to the list, but I never got a reply. Now that I'm moving my SOGo install to a new server with the latest Funambol, the question has become actual again: > As I understand it, the '_quick' tables are a form of

Re: [SOGo] Question about database tables

On 13-09-10 10:42, Martin Rabl wrote: > Hi Martijn Grendelman, > > please - do not encrypt your mails, I cannot read them! > Thank you! I am sorry. The mail was not encrypted, merely signed, but the sogo.nu MLM mangles the mail, which makes at least Thunderbird not display it correc

[SOGo] Question about database tables

Hi, Back in January, I posted a message to the list, but I never got a reply. Now that I'm moving my SOGo install to a new server with the latest Funambol, the question has become actual again: > As I understand it, the '_quick' tables are a form of index to the main > Appointment and Contact ta

[SOGo] Bind to IPv6 address

Hi, In the FAQ [1] there is an entry about how one can bind SOGo to a particular IP address, like this: WOPort = "1.2.3.4:2"; Is it possible to bind SOGo to an IPv6 address, and if so, how would one specify it? I tried the Apache-way, like this: WOPort = "[2001:470:1f15:a1e::10]:2"

Re: [SOGo] SOGO not packaged properly to work on Debain/Squeeze

[Resend; the MLM seems to break my S/MIME signed messages] On 10-09-10 07:39, harish badrinath wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Ludovic Marcotte > wrote: > > Our chroots have just been updated. The upcoming nightly builds will > be correct. > > Pleas

Re: [SOGo] SOGO not packaged properly to work on Debain/Squeeze

On 10-09-10 07:39, harish badrinath wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Ludovic Marcotte > wrote: > > Our chroots have just been updated. The upcoming nightly builds will > be correct. > > Please close this bug report, if appropriate. > > http://www.sog

Re: [SOGo] SOGO not packaged properly to work on Debain/Squeeze

Ludovic Marcotte schreef: > On 07/09/10 4:52 PM, Martijn Grendelman wrote: > >> I don't think anyone responded to this mail, but the problem at hand is >> real: the current nightly build of SOGo and some of the SOPE-packages >> from the repository mentioned here a

Re: [SOGo] SOGO not packaged properly to work on Debain/Squeeze

that anytime soon, or should I build my own? Best regards, Martijn Grendelman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Funambol 8.7?

Hi, I have been neglecting my SOGo install for a while, but I intend to upgrade to all the latest-and-greatest versions of everything shortly. Quick question: will the latest funambol-connector / SOGo work with Funambol 8.7? Thanks, Martijn. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatu