Hi, Slávek.
On 28/07/16 16:20, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz) wrote:
>> The condition for leave out this package is to have clients using
>> Outlook 2013 or higher, right?
> Without OpenChange are two possibilities for MS Outlook support:
>
> 1) ActiveSync with Outlook 2013 and later.
>
>
Hello
I ve got already a machine with Libmapi-dev, libmapistore-dev, libmapiproxy-dev
i will reinstall a clean machine
I try to do it for learning :)
Le Vendredi 29 Juillet 2016 14:36 CEST, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz)
a écrit:
Dne pá 29. července 2016 "Alain Abbas" napsal(a):
> H
Am 29.07.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz):
> Dne pá 29. července 2016 "Alain Abbas" napsal(a):
>> Hello Slavek
>> Tryed that but it still try to compile openchange and does the same error
>> my steps:
>> #tar -xzvf SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz
>> #cd SOGo-2.3.13
>> #cp -a packaging/
Dne pá 29. července 2016 "Alain Abbas" napsal(a):
> Hello Slavek
> Tryed that but it still try to compile openchange and does the same error
> my steps:
> #tar -xzvf SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz
> #cd SOGo-2.3.13
> #cp -a packaging/debian debian
> #cp packaging/debian-multiarch/control-no-openchange debian
Hello Slavek
Tryed that but it still try to compile openchange and does the same error
my steps:
#tar -xzvf SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz
#cd SOGo-2.3.13
#cp -a packaging/debian debian
#cp packaging/debian-multiarch/control-no-openchange debian/control
#./debian/rules
#dpkg-buildpackage -b
and falled on t
On Thursday 28 of July 2016 20:36:40 Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> The condition for leave out this package is to have clients using
> Outlook 2013 or higher, right?
Without OpenChange are two possibilities for MS Outlook support:
1) ActiveSync with Outlook 2013 and later.
2) Outlook CalDav Synchroniz
On 28/07/16 14:57, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz) wrote:
>> but how i can build Sogo without Openchange support I didn t find
>> any documentations or wehre to desactivate it.
>> how to desactivate it in the source ?
> Take file 'control-no-openchange' from packaging/debian-multiarch and us
Take file 'control-no-openchange' from packaging/debian-multiarch and use it
instead of the current 'control'.
--
Slávek
On Thursday 28 of July 2016 19:41:53 "Alain Abbas" wrote:
> Hello
> Thanks Slavek
> but how i can build Sogo without Openchange support
> I didn t find any documentations o
Hello
Thanks Slavek
but how i can build Sogo without Openchange support
I didn t find any documentations or wehre to desactivate it.
how to desactivate it in the source ?
thanks you
Regards
Le Jeudi 28 Juillet 2016 19:10 CEST, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz)
a écrit:
It seems that you
It seems that you are building SOGo with OpenChange from Debian Jessie, which
is probably older than expected in current SOGo versions. You can try to
build without OpenChange support.
--
Slávek
On Thursday 28 of July 2016 07:59:10 "Alain Abbas" wrote:
> Hello
> Trying to make packages on Jes
Hello
Trying to make packages on Jessie
for SOPE ok no problems
For Sogo
Error :
MAPIStoreContext.m:558:12: error: too many arguments to function
‘openchangedb_get_new_changeNumbers’
retval = openchangedb_get_new_changeNumbers (connInfo->oc_ctx, memCtx,
owner, max, &numbers);
Hello Jason
I understand your concerns. We've been providing release packages for over a
decade and our decision to make them exclusive to our customers has shocked
some members of the community. However, I remind everyone that the licensing
doesn't change; SOGo remains Free and Open Source. Th
Hello
Trying that but it try to build the sogo openchange package too when compiling
sogo
how to desactivate it ?
Regards
Le Mardi 19 Juillet 2016 22:45 CEST, "Achim Gottinger" (ac...@ag-web.biz)
a écrit:
Here is an short howto for sogo2 on wheezy without openchange
First download S
On 07/22/16 14:56, Peter Beck (pe...@datentraeger.li) wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 03:13 PM, "Sean M. Pappalardo"
> (spappala...@renegadetech.com) wrote:
>> And a sogo3 package could be added.
>
> Jaroen Dekkers is already working on that, afaik:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/GroupwareMeeting2016-04-08t
Ahh, found it in
https://packages.inverse.ca/SOGo/nightly/2/ubuntu/pool/trusty/w/wbxml2/ :-)
On 2016-07-23 13:02, Jan Skarvall wrote:
I am trying to recreate SOGo-2.3.8 (and SOPE-2.3.8) for Ubuntu 14.04
(trusty), following the description below.
When running dpkg-buildpackage -b in SOGo-2.
I am trying to recreate SOGo-2.3.8 (and SOPE-2.3.8) for Ubuntu 14.04
(trusty), following the description below.
When running dpkg-buildpackage -b in SOGo-2.3.8 I got stuck on
"dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libwbxml2-dev (>=
0.11.2)", and when looking in
https://packages.inver
Nice job, always handy !
On 22/07/2016 15:13, devteam (devt...@alpeinsoft.ch) wrote:
Thx!)
On 07/22/2016 03:05 PM, m...@celafai.it (m...@celafai.it) wrote:
Yes,
of course. I'm alone and I need a few time to build packages.
Thank You so much
Il giorno Venerdi, Luglio 22, 2016 13:13 CEST, "
On 07/22/2016 03:13 PM, "Sean M. Pappalardo"
(spappala...@renegadetech.com) wrote:
> And a sogo3 package could be added.
Jaroen Dekkers is already working on that, afaik:
https://wiki.debian.org/GroupwareMeeting2016-04-08to10
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Good idea! Thx.
On 07/22/2016 04:13 PM, "Sean M. Pappalardo"
(spappala...@renegadetech.com) wrote:
For those of you building your own Debian packages, please consider
contacting the Debian SOGo maintainer or becoming one yourself so the
version in Debian proper can be kept up to date. And a so
For those of you building your own Debian packages, please consider
contacting the Debian SOGo maintainer or becoming one yourself so the
version in Debian proper can be kept up to date. And a sogo3 package
could be added.
Sincerely,
Sean M. Pappalardo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptograph
Thx!)
On 07/22/2016 03:05 PM, m...@celafai.it (m...@celafai.it) wrote:
Yes,
of course. I'm alone and I need a few time to build packages.
Thank You so much
Il giorno Venerdi, Luglio 22, 2016 13:13 CEST, "devteam"
(devt...@alpeinsoft.ch) ha scritto:
Hi. Great jobs! Thank you!
May be comp
Yes,
of course. I'm alone and I need a few time to build packages.
Thank You so much
Il giorno Venerdi, Luglio 22, 2016 13:13 CEST, "devteam"
(devt...@alpeinsoft.ch) ha scritto:
Hi. Great jobs! Thank you!
May be compile samba 4.4 for jessie and openchange?) On 07/22/2016 11:48 AM,
m...@c
Hi. Great jobs! Thank you!
May be compile samba 4.4 for jessie and openchange?)
On 07/22/2016 11:48 AM, m...@celafai.it (m...@celafai.it) wrote:
Hi guys,
I compiled SOGo 3.1.4 packages for:
Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
Ubuntu 16.04 i386
Debian Jessie amd64
Debian Jessie i386
If You want, you can add
Thank you!
Em 22/07/2016 05:48, m...@celafai.it (m...@celafai.it) escreveu:
Hi guys,
I compiled SOGo 3.1.4 packages for:
Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
Ubuntu 16.04 i386
Debian Jessie amd64
Debian Jessie i386
If You want, you can add my personal repositories to your sources.list:
_*For Debian Jessie Us
On 2016-07-22 5:37 AM, Jan Skarvall (jan.skarv...@nejko.net) wrote:
The FAQ at
https://sogo.nu/nc/support/faq/article/how-do-i-compile-sogo-2.html
does not specify which versions of sogo and sope to choose.
If I, as an example, want to build sogo 2.3.8, should I then also
choose sope 2.3.8?
Hi guys,
I compiled SOGo 3.1.4 packages for:
Ubuntu 16.04 amd64
Ubuntu 16.04 i386
Debian Jessie amd64
Debian Jessie i386
If You want, you can add my personal repositories to your sources.list:
For Debian Jessie User
apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 30642240
and add th
The FAQ at
https://sogo.nu/nc/support/faq/article/how-do-i-compile-sogo-2.html does
not specify which versions of sogo and sope to choose.
If I, as an example, want to build sogo 2.3.8, should I then also choose
sope 2.3.8?
On 2016-07-19 20:10, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) wrote:
Hello
Am 21.07.2016 um 15:37 schrieb Daniel Bareiro (daniel-lis...@gmx.net):
>
>>> I only see the SOGo packages mentioned in my previous email using the
>>> official repositories of Debian. I'm not sure why the Debian maintainers
>>> did not include the activesync package or if they included the
The least expensive support plan at $750/yr is too expensive for just
repository access. Please consider offering an option for those of us who just
want official stable packages. $150/yr for such a service is justifiable for
how I use it.
Regards,
Jason
—
Jason Wohlford
(334) 322-1491
> O
On 07/21/16 10:49, Zhang Huangbin (z...@iredmail.org) wrote:
> Dear folks,
Hi, Zhang.
It's good to know the opinion of the founder of another open source
project, as the case of iRedMail.
> Maybe the best way to benefit all SOGo users is contacting SOGo package
> maintainer of EPEL repo
> (f
Hi!
https://sogo.nu/news/2016/article/sogo-package-repositories.html
After many months of discussion and thinking, we made the decision to
close down the public package repositories. From now on, in order to
access the production builds of SOGo for various Linux distributions,
you will need a
Dear folks,
Maybe the best way to benefit all SOGo users is contacting SOGo package
maintainer of EPEL repo (for RHEL/CentOS), Debian/Ubuntu official apt repo,
then keep SOGo up to date?
Zhang Huangbin, founder of iRedMail project: http://www.iredmail.org/
Time zone: GMT+8 (China/Beijing).
> Hi
Hi, Christian.
>> I only see the SOGo packages mentioned in my previous email using the
>> official repositories of Debian. I'm not sure why the Debian maintainers
>> did not include the activesync package or if they included the
>> activesync support in some other package.
> In Debian is
Hello,
thanks a lot. This helps, particularly I got stuck at the
libwbxml2-compatibility yesterday.
Kind regards
Heiner
Am 19.07.2016 um 22:45 schrieb Achim Gottinger (ac...@ag-web.biz):
Here is an short howto for sogo2 on wheezy without openchange
First download SOPE-3.1.4.tar.gz and SOGo
rence data:
company, number of users, degree of satisfaction
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 3:13 PM
From: "\"Amit Armoogum\" (armoo...@silkan.net)"
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package Repositories
I totally approve the fact that Inverse gu
i do not really remember but i'm quite sure i started up with the 3.1-nightlies and added packages as i felt i needed them.
The output on your previous email was after adding nightly?
-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Hi
Am 20.07.2016 um 15:20 schrieb Daniel Bareiro (daniel-lis...@gmx.net):
> On 07/20/16 09:45, "sg gs" (s...@mail.com) wrote:
>> daniel,
>
> Hi, sg gs.
>
>> we use the nightlies for ~3 weeks now without any problems, but i must
>> admit, currently in an evaluation phase - all users, all mails mi
On 07/20/16 09:45, "sg gs" (s...@mail.com) wrote:
> daniel,
Hi, sg gs.
> we use the nightlies for ~3 weeks now without any problems, but i must
> admit, currently in an evaluation phase - all users, all mails migrated,
> no calendar nor addressbook migration yet.
>
> did you install the packag
ot;Florian GRUEL\" (florian.gr...@sysoco.fr)"
*To:* users@sogo.nu
*Subject:* Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package Repositories
Hello all,
A software like Sogo isn't free to develop.
For my companie the minimun 700$ support option is a beat too
expensive, but I'm certain that some
l not refuse paying for platin support as this will pay back.
sggs
btw: nobody rides for free
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 2:18 PM
From: "\"Florian GRUEL\" (florian.gr...@sysoco.fr)"
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package Repositories
Hello a
ex
*Tél. : +33(0)4 81 65 23 28
@ :**florian.gr...@sysoco.fr <mailto:florian.gr...@sysoco.fr>
WEB :www.sysoco.fr <http://www.sysoco.fr/>*
« Garantir vos communications en situation d’exploitation ou d’urgence »
---- Message original ----
*Sujet : *[SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package R
Hi,
could anybody or Inverse provide a working .rpmmacros for build RPMs
with CentOS?
The SPEC-file for SOGo has missing build dependencies I worked around.
I created a .rpmmacros with these inital settings:
%sope_major_version 4
%sope_minor_version 9
%sope_source SOPE-%{sogo_version}.tar.gz
lable groupware - development files
-
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 2:01 PM
From: "\"Daniel Bareiro\" (daniel-lis...@gmx.net)"
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package Repositories
Hi!
On 07/20/16 08:34, Sebastian Hempel (se
Hi!
On 07/20/16 08:34, Sebastian Hempel (sebast...@hempel-roeslau.de) wrote:
>> why not go for the nightlies?
> Until now nightly for me sounds like a testing "version". I read other
> posts, that this isn't the case. So switching to nightly looks like an
> alternative.
The case with this is th
Hi,
> why not go for the nightlies?
Until now nightly for me sounds like a testing "version". I read other
posts, that this isn't the case. So switching to nightly looks like an
alternative.
Best regards
Sebastian
--
*Sebastian Hempel*
Veilchenweg 4 · 95195 Röslau · Germany
eMail: sebast...@hemp
Am 20.07.2016 um 09:49 schrieb Sven Schwedas (sven.schwe...@tao.at):
On 2016-07-19 22:45, Achim Gottinger (ac...@ag-web.biz) wrote:
Here is an short howto for sogo2 on wheezy without openchange
First download SOPE-3.1.4.tar.gz and SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz install
build-essentails and dpkg-dev
On wh
Hi.
I'm setting up my own deb repository for Sogo stable for Ubuntu 16.04 but it
could be good for Debian jessie too.
When it will be done, I can give You repository address
Thank You so much.
Il giorno Mercoledi, Luglio 20, 2016 09:49 CEST, "Sven Schwedas"
(sven.schwe...@tao.at) ha scritto:
On 2016-07-19 22:45, Achim Gottinger (ac...@ag-web.biz) wrote:
> Here is an short howto for sogo2 on wheezy without openchange
>
> First download SOPE-3.1.4.tar.gz and SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz install
> build-essentails and dpkg-dev
> On wheezy libwbxml2 is also required you can get the required version
why not go for the nightlies?
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:25 PM
From: "\"Sebastian Hempel\" (sebast...@hempel-roeslau.de)"
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ANN: SOGo Package Repositories
Hi,
>> Are there any plans to make a special support packag
Le 19/07/2016 20:37, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) a écrit :
> On 2016-07-19 2:25 PM, Davide Bozzelli (bu...@olografix.org) wrote:
>
>> What i would always appreciated in nightly repo is the stability: they
>> fix bugs even before the stable releases.
>> And what worried me now is the po
Here is an short howto for sogo2 on wheezy without openchange
First download SOPE-3.1.4.tar.gz and SOGo-2.3.13.tar.gz install
build-essentails and dpkg-dev
On wheezy libwbxml2 is also required you can get the required version
https://packages.inverse.ca/SOGo/nightly/2/debian/pool/wheezy/w/wbxml
Hi,
>> Are there any plans to make a special support package for the
>> access of the repositories only? Take the Bronze package and remove
>> the included incidents the extended support. Would this be a
>> possiblity to make a cheaper package?
> Right now, we aren't planning on doing that.
That'
That is quite a shame, as I'm using Sogi only for myself and I'm not willing to
pay 700€ per year to have access to officials packages.
But if you create a cheaper plan only for accessing the repos, I'll probably
think about it twice.
> Le 19 juil. 2016 à 21:26, Ludovic Marcotte a écrit :
>
Hello,
could you please post a short howto on how to build those debian
packages based on the control files?
Thanks and best regards
Heiner
Am 19.07.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Achim Gottinger (ac...@ag-web.biz):
Am 19.07.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca):
On 2016
and, me
On 07/19/2016 02:40 PM, Davide Bozzelli (bu...@olografix.org) wrote:
Thx Ludovic.
This reassures me.
Il 19/07/16 20:37, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) ha scritto:
On 2016-07-19 2:25 PM, Davide Bozzelli (bu...@olografix.org) wrote:
What i would always appreciated in nightly
On 2016-07-19 2:54 PM, Sebastian Hempel (sebast...@hempel-roeslau.de) wrote:
Are there any plans to make a special support package for the access of
the repositories only? Take the Bronze package and remove the included
incidents the extended support. Would this be a possiblity to make a
cheaper
Hi,
> After many months of discussion and thinking, we made the decision to
> close down the public package repositories. From now on, in order to
> access the production builds of SOGo for various Linux distributions,
> you will need a proper support contract from Inverse. The options are
> liste
Am 19.07.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca):
On 2016-07-19 12:35 PM, "Kai-Uwe Rommel" (kai-uwe.rom...@ars.de) wrote:
What does that mean for me? I have to download the source code and
compile myself? Or should use nightly builds? How do I access
these? Are these al
Thx Ludovic.
This reassures me.
Il 19/07/16 20:37, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) ha scritto:
On 2016-07-19 2:25 PM, Davide Bozzelli (bu...@olografix.org) wrote:
What i would always appreciated in nightly repo is the stability:
they fix bugs even before the stable releases.
And wha
On 2016-07-19 2:25 PM, Davide Bozzelli (bu...@olografix.org) wrote:
What i would always appreciated in nightly repo is the stability: they
fix bugs even before the stable releases.
And what worried me now is the possibility the nightly become just as
they sound like: unstable/untested repo
to
Il 19/07/16 20:10, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) write:
Nightly builds are indeed available - just like before:
https://sogo.nu/download.html
There are FAQs on how to configure your repos for Yum and apt-get.
Generating packages from the SOGo/SOPE sources isn't complex - it's
just
On 2016-07-19 12:35 PM, "Kai-Uwe Rommel" (kai-uwe.rom...@ars.de) wrote:
What does that mean for me? I have to download the source code and
compile myself? Or should use nightly builds? How do I access
these? Are these also in a package repository available to me?
How are these accessed?
Nightly
Am 19.07.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca):
Hello,
Over the past 10 years, Inverse has been developing SOGo and providing
everything (software packages, documentation, etc.) completely free of
charge. A massive number of organizations worldwide have successfully
users-requ...@sogo.nu wrote on 19.07.2016 18:13:18:
> After many months of discussion and thinking, we made the decision
> to close down the public package repositories. From now on, in order
> to access the production builds of SOGo for various Linux
> distributions, you will need a proper suppor
2016-07-19 18:13 keltezéssel, Ludovic Marcotte (lmarco...@inverse.ca) írta:
Hello,
Over the past 10 years, Inverse has been developing SOGo and providing
everything (software packages, documentation, etc.) completely free of
charge. A massive number of organizations worldwide have successfull
Hello,
Over the past 10 years, Inverse has been developing SOGo and providing
everything (software packages, documentation, etc.) completely free of
charge. A massive number of organizations worldwide have successfully
deployed SOGo and benefit for free from the continuous enhancements of
the
66 matches
Mail list logo