Hi Sergey
> On 01 Apr 2016, at 15:27, sergey (sergey.glad...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Friends, I've got the issue of migration with the exchange 2007 to Sogo. In
> particular, do you have someone experience?
> If i configure a Sogo, in parallel with the exchange 2007, there can be
> problems con
Friends, I've got the issue of migration with the exchange 2007 to Sogo. In
particular, do you have someone experience?
If i configure a Sogo, in parallel with the exchange 2007, there can be
problems connecting users to AD? As I understand it the AD should synchronize
with the samba 4?
--
users@s
On 3/30/2016 11:46 AM, lists (li...@merit.unu.edu) wrote:
On 30-3-2016 15:00, Jesús García Sáez (blax...@gmail.com) wrote:
Financial issues.
All developers (and almost all employees) quit.
Highly unlikely further development. I've not tried myself but sogo 3 is
mostly UI changes, it doesn't a
On 30-3-2016 15:00, Jesús García Sáez (blax...@gmail.com) wrote:
Financial issues.
All developers (and almost all employees) quit.
Highly unlikely further development. I've not tried myself but sogo 3 is
mostly UI changes, it doesn't affect sogo-openchange layer.
What sad news.
MJ
--
users@s
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Lukas Helebrandt wrote:
> Hi Jesús,
> > No, but I'm part of openchange team [0] and until recently I was
> > working on Zentyal (developing openchange mostly) so I know from first
> > hand that right now nobody is actively developing openchange. This
> > doesn't m
Hi Jesús,
> No, but I'm part of openchange team [0] and until recently I was
> working on Zentyal (developing openchange mostly) so I know from first
> hand that right now nobody is actively developing openchange. This
> doesn't mean the project is dead/abandoned but only that the updates
> won't b
On 3/15/2016 1:52 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 2016-03-15 12:19, EFEKT PAWKI wrote:
Now Exchange 2003 is running on multihomed SBS without a problem on a
wooden server - AMD 2x2,2Ghz, 3,5GB RAM (32bit os) with AD, DNS,
DHCP, VPN without a problem and performance problems.
All users files take
On 3/12/2016 8:36 AM, Jesús García Sáez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Johannes Faber
mailto:johan...@fundament.org>> wrote:
Hi,
"rough edges" is a real underestimating term ;)
Here is what came out after a long evaluation and polishing the
rough edges.
when or wit
On 2016-03-15 12:19, EFEKT PAWKI wrote:
Now Exchange 2003 is running on multihomed SBS without a problem on a
wooden server - AMD 2x2,2Ghz, 3,5GB RAM (32bit os) with AD, DNS, DHCP,
VPN without a problem and performance problems.
All users files take abut 60GB on server. Archives are out of serve
Hi
> On 15 Mar 2016, at 17:19, EFEKT PAWKI wrote:
>
> Hello.
> Now Exchange 2003 is running on multihomed SBS without a problem on a wooden
> server - AMD 2x2,2Ghz, 3,5GB RAM (32bit os) with AD, DNS, DHCP, VPN without a
> problem and performance problems.
> All users files take abut 60GB on se
Hello.
Now Exchange 2003 is running on multihomed SBS without a problem on a
wooden server - AMD 2x2,2Ghz, 3,5GB RAM (32bit os) with AD, DNS, DHCP, VPN
without a problem and performance problems.
All users files take abut 60GB on server. Archives are out of server on PST
files - so outside server.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:12 PM, mj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/12/2016 02:36 PM, Jesús García Sáez wrote:
>
>>
>> That was right but nowadays I'm not sure about the latter. So basically
>> development is stalled.
>>
> Is there somewhere where we can read up on this? I didn't know this. Is it
> a temp
Hi,
On 03/12/2016 02:36 PM, Jesús García Sáez wrote:
That was right but nowadays I'm not sure about the latter. So basically
development is stalled.
Is there somewhere where we can read up on this? I didn't know this. Is
it a temporarily thing, or is it really abandoned?
MJ
--
users@sogo.nu
Hi there,
> - If automatic email completion does not work, start from scratch for the
>> user.
>>
>
> I guess maybe you have to open the address book before email completion
> works, I'm not sure never dig into that because I've never seen the issue.
>
It is working from zentyal/openchange packa
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Johannes Faber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "rough edges" is a real underestimating term ;)
>
> Here is what came out after a long evaluation and polishing the rough
> edges.
>
when or with which version was your evaluation?
>
> What was positive:
>
> - It is possible to
Hi,
"rough edges" is a real underestimating term ;)
Here is what came out after a long evaluation and polishing the rough edges.
What was positive:
- It is possible to share AD with a real Windows DC, as long it is 2008
and Samba is a DC (making it everything a bit more complicated). Member
Am 11.03.16 um 15:08 schrieb Martin Simovic:
Hi,
On 11 Mar 2016, at 13:08, Quique mailto:quique...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Martin,
With OpenChange, you will have support from Outlook 2003 to Outlook
2010. There are users in production with OpenChange. There are rough
edges but for a normal
Hi,
> On 11 Mar 2016, at 13:08, Quique wrote:
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> With OpenChange, you will have support from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010.
> There are users in production with OpenChange. There are rough edges but for
> a normal usage it will work.
Is automatic Inbox refresh triggered on
Hello Martin,
With OpenChange, you will have support from Outlook 2003 to Outlook 2010.
There are users in production with OpenChange. There are rough edges but
for a normal usage it will work.
Best,
On 10 March 2016 at 18:20, Martin Simovic wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> You are right - my suggestion
Hi Steve,
You are right - my suggestion does not involve openchange at all. Openchange
would be certainly better option, but do you know anyone who has *working*
openchange setup? In production?
Best Regards
Martin.
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 17:08, Steve Ankeny wrote:
>
> Martin . . .
>
> Am I r
Martin . . .
Am I right in understanding your suggestion does not involve
OpenChange? Would that limit a user to Outlook 2013? It appears to
require a lot of resources to implement, and even then, there appear to
be limitations.
pg. 51-55, SOGo Installation and Configuration Guide
From my
Hi,
I recommend you test your setup before the actual migration. ActiveSync can be
very resource demanding, especially with large mailboxes. At the moment, every
EAS connection requires a separate sogod process, which in your case means you
need 32+ GB RAM - assuming your users use Outlook only
Hello.
I have to migrate from Exchange 2003 to something else.
My users will kill me if I force them to switch from MS Outlook to
something else.
How Sogo behave with account with a lot of data using Active Sync protocol?
Especially owner of company - he have 5GB of OST and 45 in PST.
Calendar is
23 matches
Mail list logo
