Re: [SOGo] Trouble with Funambol Connector

2011-02-06 Thread Wm Stewart
This is preventing us from deploying SOGo to customers, so we are keen for any help anyone can provide. Does anyone have any thoughts on the observation I see that the difference is the reference name of the event. SOGo uses just numbers, Evolution uses long text.? Cheers, Bill On Wed,

Re: [SOGo] Trouble with Funambol Connector

2011-01-13 Thread Karoly Molnar
Thanks for the quick help, appreciate it. On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 23:41 -0500, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: On 11-01-12 10:17 PM, Karoly Molnar wrote: Hey Guys, I'm using latest SOGo 1.3.4 on Ubuntu Lucid, backend is PostgreSQL v8.4 everything works fine. Funambol v8.7 is also installed and I

[SOGo] Trouble with Funambol Connector

2011-01-12 Thread Karoly Molnar
Hey Guys, I'm using latest SOGo 1.3.4 on Ubuntu Lucid, backend is PostgreSQL v8.4 everything works fine. Funambol v8.7 is also installed and I followed the documentation and created the sogo-card, sogo-cal, sogo-todo sources with the Funambol admin. I setup a BlackBerry based on the

Re: [SOGo] Trouble with Funambol Connector

2011-01-12 Thread Mohit Chawla
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Karoly Molnar kmol...@eseri.com wrote: Anybody has run into a problem like this? It seems that the funambol client on the BB completely disregards the remote name settings. Well, not at least with calendar (sogo-cal). Haven't tested out for contacts though.

Re: [SOGo] Trouble with Funambol Connector

2011-01-12 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 11-01-12 10:17 PM, Karoly Molnar wrote: Hey Guys, I'm using latest SOGo 1.3.4 on Ubuntu Lucid, backend is PostgreSQL v8.4 everything works fine. Funambol v8.7 is also installed and I followed the documentation and created the sogo-card, sogo-cal, sogo-todo sources with the Funambol admin. I