Hi,
[cc'd to SATalk]
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 20:45:18 -0700 Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 6:57:12 PM, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
You've sparked a thought. I'd rather not (badly) rewrite and maintain
existing, tested code so maybe the right thing to do is take the
Subject: Sorry to ask but how to I unsubscribe
I don't see anything obvious.
Look in the mail message headers
Loren
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:23:48AM -0700, Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could perhaps set up a separate SURBL for blog spammers.
It would be a slight shift in focus since the other SURBLs are
all for email spam. Can you give an idea of how many records
you have?
Since my weblog
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:50:29 AM, Matthew Hunter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:23:48AM -0700, Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to what looks like 3-4 entities and about 20 domains. I just
started compiling it today, though. There are probably more
buried in the logs that
Which blogger are you using?
I moved my own blog over to Wordpress a couple of months ago and I haven't
had any issues with comment spammers since.
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd
Hosting, co-location domains
http://www.blacknight.ie/
Tel. +353 59 9137101
--
Email
At 01:07 PM 9/2/2004 +0300, Alexander Piavka wrote:
Now a couple of days ago on one hosts
the network tests stoped working, while nothing was changed
and both hosts are open in the firewall.
Any ideas what could be the reason?
First check for gross errors:
spamassassin --lint
Then try
-Original Message-
From: Rob McEwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 9:54 AM
To: 'SURBL Discussion list'; 'Jeff Chan'; 'SATalk'
Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: Applying SURBL against blog comment
spammers
SO I say, go ahead and add them.
Chris... where
Does anyone have any ideas as to why I can't send the GTUBE text from
sample-spam.txt to either myself or my wife? The emails just don't
show up.
BTW - I had a disk crash, and decided to try SA 3.0 instead of
re-installing 2.6 and then having to turn around and install 3.0
shortly thereafter. I
