On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 12:20, Robert Menschel wrote:
Copy William Sterns' blacklist file
from http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.cf into
your user_prefs.
I was doing this, but this list is so large that it caused spamassassin to take about 20 seconds to initialize each
Hi Bob,
Many thanks for taking the time to send such a detailed reply.
Your situation is similar to mine, but I'm still at SA 2.63. Last week's
performance stunk at 0 false positives and 20 false negatives (a rotten
99.5% accuracy record; I'm not satisfied unless I hit 99.8%).
That's awesome; I'd b
Hello Stewart,
Saturday, September 11, 2004, 11:57:46 PM, you wrote:
SN> Hi,
SN> I have one linux-based account on a shared server with a hosting
SN> provider; they presently use cpanel, exim 4.42, SpamAssassin 2.64,
SN> and imapd. We are unhappy with the filtering performance
SN> (> 10% false
> If I run spamd on a different server, how are the user profiles for my
local
> users handled?
We use MySQL and it means this is fairly easy
Darren
We run a large number of servers and do our best to keep ontop of spam
reports etc..
One user recently enabled webmail fron Nuke and got a spammer using it to
send out a ton of junk mail.
The first reports we got we tracked it down and removed the site in question
etc..
However, SORBs are demand
Hi,
I was playing today with the DB interface of SpamAssassin, and saw that
the info of the users is read by the username running the spamd process,
now, if i run a site-wide installation, where the spamd doesnt know
about the existing users, it runs as nobody, can i make SpamAssassin use
the T
Thank you Matt Kettler and John Fleming !
Apparently the files do not appear to be on this system !
At 09:47 AM 9/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Where on a system might you be able to read what is white listed ?...
One fast, sure-fire way is to grep all the configfiles:
grep whitelist /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf
grep whitelist /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.cf
grep whitelist ~/.spam
Where on a system might you be able to read what is white listed ?...
At 03:50 AM 9/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
1. On the return trip back to spamc...spamc dies with a failed sanity check
error.
I suspect this is an error related to the user running spamc being
different then the user running spamd.
It shouldn't be.. Perhaps it might happen if the user running spam
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Mike Loiterman wrote:
Hello Mike.
> Two problems:
> 1. On the return trip back to spamc...spamc dies with a failed
> sanity check error. I suspect this is an error related to the user
> running spamc being different then the user running spamd. I tried
> running spam
From: "Richard Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> please let me ask you a beginners question:
> I use Kmail as email program and invoke spamassasin-learn with sa-learn
> --showdots --spam-folder/* , the same for --ham-folder/* via a shell
script.
> I have several hundreds of mails in both directo
Sorry, I forgot: of course the aguments --spam resp. --ham are included in the
commands.
Hi,
please let me ask you a beginners question:
I use Kmail as email program and invoke spamassasin-learn with sa-learn
--showdots --spam --spam-folder/* , the same for --ham --ham-folder/* via a
shell scri
Hi,
please let me ask you a beginners question:
I use Kmail as email program and invoke spamassasin-learn with sa-learn
--showdots --spam-folder/* , the same for --ham-folder/* via a shell script.
I have several hundreds of mails in both directories. Each time sa-learn is
invoked, it says "Learne
I'm trying to get my spamc to send to a spamd running on another server on
my network.
So far, this has been partially successful -- messages are being sent from
the machine running spamc to the machine running spamd and then scanned.
Two problems:
1. On the return trip back to spamc...spamc di
Sense of humor. :)
* jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-11 23:30:06 -0700]:
>
> Please do remember that at half the population has an IQ below 100.
> Please also note that most denizens of this list probably fall into
> the above 120 to below infinity crowd. Note also that this does not
> mean th
> They would not be used, unless you did a lot of fancy
> configuration so that spamd could find them.
Where would I do this fancy configuration?
--
Mike Loiterman
grantADLER
Tel: 630-302-4944
Fax: 773-442-0992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E
GPG Key: 0x66
Kolla in.
--
Simon Gate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Predrag,
Saturday, September 11, 2004, 9:47:42 AM, you wrote:
PL> Spammer apparently is using [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the FROm
PL> field of the emails he is sending out. Domain is one of my customers
PL> virtual domain, spamme
Hi,
I have one linux-based account on a shared server with a hosting
provider; they presently use cpanel, exim 4.42, SpamAssassin 2.64,
and imapd. We are unhappy with the filtering performance
(> 10% false negatives, even with required_hits=5.0).
I'd like to add custom rules, but the provider won'
On Saturday 11 September 2004 10:20 pm, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> If I run spamd on a different server, how are the user profiles for my
> local users handled?
They would not be used, unless you did a lot of fancy
configuration so that spamd could find them.
--
_
Please do remember that at half the population has an IQ below 100.
Please also note that most denizens of this list probably fall into
the above 120 to below infinity crowd. Note also that this does not
mean they can't get it. It just means there is a serious time lag in
their thinking processes
If I run spamd on a different server, how are the user profiles for my local
users handled?
--
Mike Loiterman
grantADLER
Tel: 630-302-4944
Fax: 773-442-0992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E
GPG Key: 0x661D0518
Are there really people that will buy their medicine from a site with
name like this? http://oaktjtxa.efkdblh.info
Predrag
On Sep 11, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Tom Meunier wrote:
If the spammer isn't authoritative for your domain, they can list
everything in the universe as an MX record and it would never be
checked. Unless the spammer owns tone of the three name servers that
is authoritative for bubbanfriends.org, in whi
Hello Predrag,
Saturday, September 11, 2004, 9:47:42 AM, you wrote:
PL> Spammer apparently is using [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the FROm
PL> field of the emails he is sending out. Domain is one of my customers
PL> virtual domain, spammer made up the username in the email address.
PL> Now I am getting b
Hello Declan,
Friday, September 10, 2004, 9:16:33 PM, you wrote:
DM> [NOOB warning here!]
Noob to yoo too. :-)
DM> header ISPTo:addr =~ /([EMAIL PROTECTED],5}\b)/
I don't think that \S+? construct is valid -- there's nothing before the
? to say "zero or one" of.
Looks to me like what yo
Please comment on the following with any hints, tips
or pointers?...
;; sa-spam-removal.el
;;
;; Copyright (c) 2003, 2004 Trevis J. Rothwell
;;
;; This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
Feed them to spamassassin to learn them as spam. (sa-learn --spam)
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Predrag Lezaic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored too low for
> spamassassin to get it? Do you create your own rules or try to block it
At 10:59 PM 9/11/2004 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
But even if *I* don't use forwarding, one of my customers may. For
example, if I need to email a customer of mine who is using, say, ieee.org
forwarding, and it is redirecting to AOL, my SPF records will cause AOL to
reject my message to my custom
> What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored too low for
> spamassassin to get it? Do you create your own rules or try to block it
> some other way? Is there a way to get SA to train itself by telling it
> that certain message is a spam such as Thunderbird etc...?
Almost every ti
On Sep 11, 2004, at 8:56 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:18 PM 9/11/2004 -0700, p dont think wrote:
BEWARE, however, that SPF is a hotly contested technology that breaks
forwarding in many cases
True, but if your domain is used for forwarding, you can simply not
publish SPF records, or publish wide
My understanding of your post is that you want to catch a 'to' with
"@ntlworld." that isn't followed by "com". Assuming that is right, then I
think something like the following (completely untested!) rule might work:
header NOT_NTLWORLDTo~= /[EMAIL PROTECTED](?!com)\w/
This should catch anyt
Tom Caudron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed SpamAssassin version 2.64 via Synaptic on Fedora Core 2.
> I want to use it to filter spam in Evolution. In Evolution, I created a
> filter that pipes the message to a shell command on retrieval (pipes to
> "spamc -c").
>
> I get no hits
Thanks. What is this address? SpamAssassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Predrag
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 08:42:22PM -0500, Predrag Lezaic wrote:
What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored too low for
spamassassin to get it? Do you create your own rules or try to bloc
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 08:42:22PM -0500, Predrag Lezaic wrote:
> What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored too low for
> spamassassin to get it? Do you create your own rules or try to block it
> some other way? Is there a way to get SA to train itself by telling it
> that cer
I've installed SpamAssassin version 2.64 via Synaptic on Fedora Core 2.
I want to use it to filter spam in Evolution. In Evolution, I created a
filter that pipes the message to a shell command on retrieval (pipes to
"spamc -c").
I get no hits at all. :-( Much of my mail is /clearly/ spam.
I s
What are you doing about spam that goes through being scored too low for
spamassassin to get it? Do you create your own rules or try to block it
some other way? Is there a way to get SA to train itself by telling it
that certain message is a spam such as Thunderbird etc...?
Thanks,
redrag
At 12:18 PM 9/11/2004 -0700, p dont think wrote:
BEWARE, however, that SPF is a hotly contested technology that breaks
forwarding in many cases
True, but if your domain is used for forwarding, you can simply not publish
SPF records, or publish wide-open ones. However, this is really something
fo
38 matches
Mail list logo
