snicker

2004-10-30 Thread jdow
Earthlink keeps trying to get me to turn on their spam blocker. There is a minor detail. It scores 5.1 with a 5.0 limit. Somehow, I just thought that was too funny for words. {^_-}

How to get SA to work globally without errors

2004-10-30 Thread Stephen Bradley
I installed a newer Fedora system today and SA along with Sendmail and Procmail are throwing errors related to individual users .forward files and in general anything in the user directory. I was using SA 2.64 on an older Redhat system and everything was fine. Now I am inundated with errors for

Load average probs

2004-10-30 Thread John Fleming
I've followed the memory-hog threads of late, but as a rather inexperienced Linux person, some of it is over my head. I'm using SA v2.64 with network tests and bayes. Everything is fine except that several times a day the server seems overwhelmed with load averages 4-12. Here is a minor example

Re: sa-learn dump showing only binary tokens

2004-10-30 Thread spamassassin
I have a development idea. How about the tokens db storing not only the hash and frequency, but also the actual plaintext string. The string would only be used for database dumps and reports, while the hash would be used for the actual matching and scoring. I think this would give the best of

Re: sa-learn dump showing only binary tokens

2004-10-30 Thread Michael Parker
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 11:24:30AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a development idea. How about the tokens db storing not only the hash and frequency, but also the actual plaintext string. The string would only be used for database dumps and reports, while the hash would be used for

Re: debug: received-header: unknown format

2004-10-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: debug: received-header: unknown format: from harmonypets.every1.net ([222.47.73.116])by myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id i9UBhAFh025756;Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:43:12 -0400 I looked at the parse_received_headers

Newbie question: sa-learn

2004-10-30 Thread Dan Barker
SpamAssassin 3.0.1 running under IMail 8.13 (Windoze) is doing really great! I've got about a 1% false negative rate, and way way less fp. Cool! I know it's critical to sa-(re)learn any FP. I usually sa-learn the false negatives, but sometimes I get lazy. Is that OK? What I mean is, Is autolearn

Re: debug: received-header: unknown format

2004-10-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, now that I look, even my ham - this mailing list in particular - follow that format - you sure it isn't normal? 100%. Something in your stream is screwing up your headers. Received: from [63.240.76.165] (HELO

[RD] evilnumbers.cf updated

2004-10-30 Thread Matt Yackley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today marks the first full year that SARE has been contributing custom rules to the SA community. Happy Birthday SARE! Updated: evilnumbers.cf http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm Cheers, matt - - SARE

Re: [RD] evilnumbers.cf updated

2004-10-30 Thread Jan Theofel
Hello Matt, On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:00:01PM -0500, Matt Yackley wrote: Today marks the first full year that SARE has been contributing custom rules to the SA community. Happy Birthday SARE! From where do you know this? There's no note about that on the SARE website. Jan -- Jan