Earthlink keeps trying to get me to turn on their spam blocker. There is
a minor detail. It scores 5.1 with a 5.0 limit. Somehow, I just thought
that was too funny for words.
{^_-}
I installed a newer Fedora system today and SA along with Sendmail and
Procmail are throwing errors related to individual users .forward files
and in general anything in the user directory.
I was using SA 2.64 on an older Redhat system and everything was fine.
Now I am inundated with errors for
I've followed the memory-hog threads of late, but as a rather
inexperienced Linux person, some of it is over my head. I'm using SA v2.64
with network tests and bayes. Everything is fine except that several times
a day the server seems overwhelmed with load averages 4-12. Here is a minor
example
I have a development idea. How about the tokens db storing not only the hash
and frequency, but also the actual plaintext string. The string would only be
used for database dumps and reports, while the hash would be used for the
actual matching and scoring.
I think this would give the best of
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 11:24:30AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a development idea. How about the tokens db storing not only the hash
and frequency, but also the actual plaintext string. The string would only
be used for database dumps and reports, while the hash would be used for
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debug: received-header: unknown format: from harmonypets.every1.net
([222.47.73.116])by myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id
i9UBhAFh025756;Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:43:12 -0400
I looked at the parse_received_headers
SpamAssassin 3.0.1 running under IMail 8.13 (Windoze) is doing really great!
I've got about a 1% false negative rate, and way way less fp. Cool!
I know it's critical to sa-(re)learn any FP. I usually sa-learn the false
negatives, but sometimes I get lazy. Is that OK?
What I mean is, Is autolearn
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, now that I look, even my ham - this mailing list in particular -
follow that format - you sure it isn't normal?
100%. Something in your stream is screwing up your headers.
Received: from [63.240.76.165] (HELO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today marks the first full year that SARE has been contributing custom rules to
the
SA community.
Happy Birthday SARE!
Updated:
evilnumbers.cf
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm
Cheers,
matt
- -
SARE
Hello Matt,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:00:01PM -0500, Matt Yackley wrote:
Today marks the first full year that SARE has been contributing custom rules
to the
SA community.
Happy Birthday SARE!
From where do you know this? There's no note about that on the SARE
website.
Jan
--
Jan
10 matches
Mail list logo