On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually, now that I look, even my ham - this mailing list in particular - > follow that format - you sure it isn't normal?
100%. Something in your stream is screwing up your headers. > Received: from [63.240.76.165] (HELO sccimhc91.asp.att.net) (63.240.76.165)by > apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:21:42 -0700 > Received: from linus.heise.nu > (12-223-226-13.client.insightbb.com[12.223.226.13])by sccimhc91.asp.att.net > (sccimhc91) with ESMTPid <20041030142139i9100hp1ime>; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 > 14:21:40 +0000 > Received: from linus.heise.nu (linus.heise.nu [192.168.1.101])by > linus.heise.nu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9UELdw6003612for > <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:21:39 -0500 For instance, most received headers aren't 1 big line. It looks like something is unfolding the headers incorrectly. That's why you have no space before "by", "for", "id", etc. Here's one off the mailing list, btw: Received: from [63.171.93.5] (HELO visioncomm.net) (63.171.93.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:12:01 -0700 -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Don't drink water. Fish make love in it.
pgpdHhzg4OBVH.pgp
Description: PGP signature