On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, now that I look, even my ham - this mailing list in particular - 
> follow that format - you sure it isn't normal?

100%.  Something in your stream is screwing up your headers.

> Received: from [63.240.76.165] (HELO sccimhc91.asp.att.net) (63.240.76.165)by 
> apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:21:42 -0700
> Received: from linus.heise.nu 
> (12-223-226-13.client.insightbb.com[12.223.226.13])by sccimhc91.asp.att.net 
> (sccimhc91) with ESMTPid <20041030142139i9100hp1ime>; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 
> 14:21:40 +0000
> Received: from linus.heise.nu (linus.heise.nu [192.168.1.101])by 
> linus.heise.nu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9UELdw6003612for 
> <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:21:39 -0500

For instance, most received headers aren't 1 big line.  It looks like
something is unfolding the headers incorrectly.  That's why you have no
space before "by", "for", "id", etc.

Here's one off the mailing list, btw:

Received: from [63.171.93.5] (HELO visioncomm.net) (63.171.93.5)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:12:01 -0700

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Don't drink water. Fish make love in it.

Attachment: pgpdHhzg4OBVH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to