Hi
I am using 2.64 with local.cf settings
bayes_path /var/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 777
to get round ownership and other issues like space under users accounts.
problem i have is with bayes_journal , it always seem to be owned by
user.group of the mail owner.
log shows
Dec 29 1
Regarding Fred's rule sets at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm. Do these duplicate any of
the other SARE rules? Are they advised for Spam Assassin 3.0x? Are
there any known issues with false positives for Asian or other
languages? Have they been mass checked?
Thanks for any info yo
At 12:07 PM 12/29/2004, Rakesh wrote:
Can any body tell me when does Bayes00 gives the score. Is it
1) If a mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has never seen before.
or
2) If the mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has previously learnt has spam.
Neither.
BAYES_00 fires when there are a lot of tok
> Can any body tell me when does Bayes00 gives the score. Is it
>
> 1) If a mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has never seen before.
> or
> 2) If the mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has previously learnt has
> spam.
3) Neither.
Bayes 00 means that Bayes has seen lots of tokens and Bayes is
At 01:04 PM 12/29/2004, Matt Linzbach wrote:
Can someone point me to a thread that would discuss the scoring of the
Bayesian rules in 3.0. Specifically why BAYES_99 would score less than
BAYES_95 for bayes+net tests?
Why would you expect it to be higher? It's a common human perception that
ever
Matt Linzbach wrote:
Can someone point me to a thread that would discuss the scoring of the Bayesian
rules in 3.0. Specifically why BAYES_99 would score less than BAYES_95 for
bayes+net tests?
TIA
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/61212/match=
just for 1 :)
You might
Can someone point me to a thread that would discuss the scoring of the Bayesian
rules in 3.0. Specifically why BAYES_99 would score less than BAYES_95 for
bayes+net tests?
TIA
Matt
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:00:48AM -0900, Andy Firman wrote:
> I have SA 3.0.1 on a FreeBSD box with Exim/Mailman
> and one of my users sends out a newsletter blast to
> over 1,000 people and this almost cripples the server
> because of the intense SA processing.
Depends on how you call SA.
With
Rakesh wrote:
Hii
Can any body tell me when does Bayes00 gives the score. Is it
1) If a mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has never seen before.
or
2) If the mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has previously learnt has
spam.
The reason of my weird question is that recently I have suddenly star
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:34:34AM -0500, Jim Maul wrote:
> Im using sitewide SA setup so there are no user prefs. I'd really like
> a way to do this within one of the tools that im already using if at all
> possible. Does anyone else have any suggestions?
As of 3.x, this should be possible b
Hii
Can any body tell me when does Bayes00 gives the score. Is it
1) If a mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has never seen before.
or
2) If the mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has previously learnt has
spam.
The reason of my weird question is that recently I have suddenly started
recieving
I have SA 3.0.1 on a FreeBSD box with Exim/Mailman
and one of my users sends out a newsletter blast to
over 1,000 people and this almost cripples the server
because of the intense SA processing.
How do I get SA to not scan certain posts?
Or is this an Exim question?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdow wrote:
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
bypasses
SA on your system, if you can.
Loren
With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot say.
Exactly. I have been unable to find a wa
>> jdow wrote:
>> > From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> >>You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
>> >
>> > bypasses
>> >
>> >>SA on your system, if you can.
>> >>
>> >>Loren
>> >
>> >
>> > With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot
>I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
>to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
This comes up a lot, and a lot of people already responded, but I wanted to
add one more comment. Think of it simply as:
After every rule is run, increment score count. N
jdow wrote:
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
bypasses
SA on your system, if you can.
Loren
With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot say.
Exactly. I have been unable to find a way to do this on a system
At 11:20 AM 12/29/2004 +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
Only if you do a spamassassin --report.
SA used to auto-report spam over a threshold, but this feature was removed
a
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
bypasses
> SA on your system, if you can.
>
> Loren
With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot say.
---8<---
###
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
> > to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
>
> This gets discussed periodically, and I think there may be a bugzilla
ticket
> open on it as an enhamcement request.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:20:16AM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
> I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
No. See the man page for razor-admin.
Rainer
Hello,
I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/
LUG sur Orléans et alentours.
Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2004 07:10 schrieb Loren Wilton:
> You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
> bypasses SA on your system, if you can.
>
> Loren
If you have unic characteristic in a message it's the best way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2004 01:03 schrieb Paul J Fries:
> I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
> to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
>
> You would need to run all of the negative scoring (non-spammy
You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply bypasses
SA on your system, if you can.
Loren
> I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
> to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
This gets discussed periodically, and I think there may be a bugzilla ticket
open on it as an enhamcement request.
It seems there are some implementation annoyances with
At 05:03 PM 12/28/2004 -0700, you wrote:
I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
That was a feature, in SA 2.1.x if I recall correctly.
The problem with that is to do it right SA must make sure to run all the
negat
The Wiki is not quite clear, but it sounds like it is only checking the from
category, but I am trying to white list you all, so I don't have to dig
threads out of my spamfilters.
Rob
--
Mountlake Terrace, WA
USA
Paul J Fries wrote:
I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
You would need to run all of the negative scoring (non-spammy) rules
first, and then start running the positive scoring tests. Then once the
message reache
From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2004 15:34 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2004 22:01 schrieb jdow:
> > From: "
I was thinking, would it be feasible to have an option for spamassassin
to exit after a message reached the spam threshold?
You would need to run all of the negative scoring (non-spammy) rules
first, and then start running the positive scoring tests. Then once the
message reached the spam threshol
30 matches
Mail list logo
