I also uncommented the DCCIFD_ARGS line.
# used to start dccifd
# a common value is
# DCCIFD_ARGS=-SHELO -Smail_host -SSender -SList-ID
DCCIFD_ARGS=
My DCCIFD_ARGS is empty. Should I add the options that is shown above?
Was there a dccd file created in /etc/init.d as part of the
installation
...
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:46:52 -0500
From: Eric A. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA addr tests need to be updated
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
At 10:07 PM 3/12/2005, Norman Zhang wrote:
Someone pointed out to me I should look for rcdcc, but I only have
# slocate cdcc
/usr/bin/cdcc
I'm not too familiar with the scripts that come with DCC for this.. I just
wrote my own init script to start dccifd.
Should I use this instead? BTW do I
My dcc on RedHat 8.0 is located in
/var/dcc directory
You should see DCCIFD there as well.
I had to change a line in the /var/dcc/dcc_conf to
DCCIFD_ENABLE=ON
Also, make sure you install the latest DCC with DCCIFD from the Rayolite
website (if you do not have it).
Put the path to DCC in
Hi everyone!
Probably I'm doing a stupid question... but, anyway, here it go:
I saved in a folder some messages that I received classified as no spam. So, i
run these command:
sa-learn --spam path to folder
So I take the following :
Learned from 2 message(s) (3 message(s) examined).
So, I
On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 19:07 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
I also uncommented the DCCIFD_ARGS line.
# used to start dccifd
# a common value is
# DCCIFD_ARGS=-SHELO -Smail_host -SSender -SList-ID
DCCIFD_ARGS=
My DCCIFD_ARGS is empty. Should I add the options that is shown above?
I
Citando Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 11:57 PM 3/12/2005, you wrote:
So, I redirect those messages to me and I received them as no spam again!
Define exactly what you mean by redirect those messages. What specific
actions did you do?
I used redirect tool from webmail (horde)
Jens Ahlin wrote:
When trying to build rpm using rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
fails with
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
After installing these modules
At 20:15 -0800 03/06/2005, Vicki Brown wrote:
I can create a user rule for mail not addressed (To or Cc) to me
header CF_NOT_FOR_METoCc !~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
score CF_NOT_FOR_ME 4.0
describe CF_NOT_FOR_ME Neither To nor Cc me
However, the
Hello,
for some days now my bayesian DB does not seem to grow. Its size remains
stable. It is read with no problems by SA 3.0.2, but nothing new is written.
I send an email to me, it is classified as BAYES_50. I sa-learn it as spam,
send it again, and it is still BAYES_50 (I expected to see it
Jens Ahlin wrote:
When trying to build rpm using rpmbuild -tb
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2.tar.gz
fails with
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Digest::SHA1) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
perl(HTML::Parser) is needed by spamassassin-3.0.2-1
After installing these
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:27:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Does anyone have or know about a list of spam-advertised URIs
where the spam they appeared in was sent through open relays,
zombies, open proxies, etc. In other words does anyone know
of a list of spamvertised web sites or their domains
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 5:12:30 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, March 11, 2005, 11:27:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Does anyone have or know about a list of spam-advertised URIs
where the spam they appeared in was sent through open relays,
zombies, open proxies, etc. In other words does anyone
GRP Productions wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:21:12 +0200:
for some days now my bayesian DB does not seem to grow. Its size remains
stable. It is read with no problems by SA 3.0.2, but nothing new is written.
I send an email to me, it is classified as BAYES_50. I sa-learn it as spam,
send
wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:57:18 -0300:
So, I redirect those messages to me and I received them as no spam again!
As I just wrote to GRP Productions: Bayes doesn't work this way.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Hi all, I installed spam assassin (3.0.2) in my linux box and looks like
does not work (probably due to my configuration). I tried RTFM but still
cannot make it work.
Situation:
I use spamassassin with simscan + qmail. My problem is when I use the
spamassassin (not spamc) + sample-spam.txt it
Jeff Chan wrote on Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:12:30 -0800:
One fairly easy for anyone running a large SpamAssassin
installation to help us get this data would be to simply grep
for XBL and SURBL rules hitting the same message and report
out the URI domains from those messages.
I have a large
...The person with two clocks is never really sure of
the current time.
OT, but... above - *not* a good quote, but it sounds nice)
To be `sure' of the time, you need at least three clocks (look at the
documentation for ntp/ntpd).
...
...
Paul Shupak
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 5:36:55 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
Perhaps some kind person could write a reporting function in
SpamAssassin for this?
Hmm, perhaps if we could extract *all* URI domains from messages
sent through XBLed senders then prioritize those say by frequency
of
On Sunday, March 13, 2005, 7:31:01 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I'm not asking for trap data. I'm asking to look for XBL hits,
then take the URIs from messages that hit XBL. In other words
I want to get the sites that are being advertised through
exploited hosts.
Nothing to do with traps
It would probably help if I explained that I brought up two
different but related ides in quick succession:
1. Asking for URI domains of messages sent through zombies, open
relays, open proxies, etc. detected by XBL that mentioned SURBL URIs.
2. Asking for URI domains of messages sent through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've released a new version of evilnumbers and there are several changes in the
new
version.
Ruleset name change:
In order to get this old setup in line with current SARE standards the name of
the
ruleset has changed from evilnumbers.cf to
This doesn't prove anything. sa-learn --dump magic shows you what's inside.
Also, Bayes is not a checksum system like Razor, that's its strength. If
you
learn something to it that means that it extracts tokens (short pieces)
from
the message and adjusts its internal probability for them being
That is the output of --dump magic? I haven't ever seen it formatted that
nicely. I assume you skipped the first line, but there's also missing the
expire atime delta. So, where do you got this from? Not directly from
sa-learn
--dump magic I'd say. You are running SA thru some interface? You
24 matches
Mail list logo
