| If a rule doesn't FP for you, then you can set it to 20.
Sure, you *can*, but why would you want to score a single rule at 20?
Especially one like this which, as we've just seen, can produce FP's.
Well, as an example I have a couple of rules that *can* (and for others,
outright *would*) FP,
I'm currently running SpamAssassin 3.01 on a linux
box running Exim 4.43. When I upgraded to SA 3.01 I also configured exim
to reject messages at data time based on a spam score that was sufficiently
high. Since doing that I have found that every once in a while one of the
spamd child
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:24:24 -0400, Greg Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FYI:
Ok, I just tried upgrading 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 and get the following
--
During install, after I run: perl Makefile.PL
It asks me a few setup questions then I get:
Warning: I could not locate your
There are two places that you can look for blacklist entries. Either in the
local.cf file or in the user_prefs file. I use the user_prefs since not
everyone wants the same addresses blocked. Squirrel Mail is supposed
to have a
plug in that will allow each user to manage their user_prefs file.
There's got to be a way to stop this. I'm getting over 100 of these a day.
-DevonOn 4/30/05, Bret Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an older episode (Saturday 30 April 2005 16:03), Devon Harding wrote: Has any seen these kind of SPAM passing through? Where the SPAMMER would use HTML tables to
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:06:46PM -0600, Jeremy Beaty wrote:
From the release notes for 3.02 and 3.03 I don't believe this has
been addressed as a specific issue, so though I will be upgrading, I
don't think it will fix this problem. Does anyone know what causes
this and ways to fix it?
On Friday 29 April 2005 05:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one minor complaint: effectively released on a Friday. I can't be the only
one with a company policy of not changing stuff on Friday (before the
weekend)
Ok, Brian, next time we will insist the developers check with you for your
Are yoiu cc-ing yourself on the reports? I've had stupid mail systems kick
back mail I sent to people claiming 'relaying denied' if I had a cc that
wasn't at the target destinaiton.
Loren
OK, this is probably just an over-cautious MySQL question.
All of the examples I look at for setting up per-user prefs using SQL show
creating a table that looks like:
username pref value
So, if I want to allow users to control 5 values I would have a table that
looks like thsi:
user1 pref1
in a SA rule, i want to match
/p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
but not portfolio
what exactly is the regexp syntax to achieve that?
thanks,
wolfgang
Hi all,
What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
SA in action: ;-)
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:45:21 KGST:80593: SA: REPORT hits = 51.9/3.5
4.1 MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary
1.2 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject
I've seen one as high as 94.2 and was a really short spam too. Funny how
scoing works. 8*)
-Doc (SA/SARE/URIBL/SURBL - Stealth Ninja)
Roman Serbski wrote:
Hi all,
What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
SA in action: ;-)
Sat, 30
/p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
but not portfolio
/(?!portfolio)p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
Loren
On Saturday 30 April 2005 10:59 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
Are yoiu cc-ing yourself on the reports? I've had stupid mail systems kick
back mail I sent to people claiming 'relaying denied' if I had a cc that
wasn't at the target destinaiton.
Loren
Nope, I finally managed to get an email
Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
OK, this is probably just an over-cautious MySQL question.
All of the examples I look at for setting up per-user prefs using SQL show
creating a table that looks like:
username pref value
So, if I want to allow users to control 5 values I would have a table that
I upgraded to SA 3.0.3 with no problem on a test server shortly after it
came out. No problem.
Now that I'm trying to update my production server from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3
(since Friday eve), every CPAN mirror I try results in the following
messages
Going to read
(Fixed duh! mistake in subject.)
I upgraded to SA 3.0.3 with no problem on a test server shortly after it
came out. No problem.
Now that I'm trying to update my production server from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3
(since Friday eve), every CPAN mirror I try results in the following
messages
Going to read
I've read through the archives several times, and hoped that over the
last year or so someone would build the functionality, or at least
mention it one way or another - I haven't seen it.
Is there any way to take an already trained Mozilla bayes structure and
hand it directly off to
In an older episode (Sunday 01 May 2005 02:07), Loren Wilton wrote:
Again and again, we receive messages that contain stuff like
a href=3dhttp://advinc-ma=2enetfirms=2ecom/;
instead of
a href=http://advinc-ma.netfirms.com/;
That prevents uri / body rules like e.g.
no/yes
In an older episode (Sunday 01 May 2005 12:49), Loren Wilton wrote:
/p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
but not portfolio
/(?!portfolio)p(?:0|o)rtf(?:0|o)(?:\||l)i(?:0|o)/
thanks, works fine.
wolfgang
I'm still not sure exactly what was happening, but I was able to get it
working after I deleted the ~/.cpan directory. Previously, I was just
deleting ~/.cpan/Metadata.
Dan O'Brien
__
Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone: 703-845-8400
Antonio,
Thanks for your help!!! Actually, I have looked at each of these files
and can not find the an entry in any of the files that represents the
message that I manually tested. I was loged in as root when I tested.
I have also logged in with other accounts and tested but still have not
On Sunday 01 May 2005 06:57 am, Dan O'Brien wrote:
Warning: This index file is 42 days old.
Please check the host you chose as your CPAN mirror for staleness.
I'll continue but problems seem likely to happen.
You just want to tell cpan to use a different source as its
primary.
You can do
Hi!
Subject: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 Released
From: Michael Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], users@spamassassin.apache.org,
dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:22:22 -0500 (20:22 PDT)
check it out! was that
Apologies if I missed this rather
simple question in the FAQ's, but I really did look.
I'm on fedora core 3, using spamassassin 3.0.3 with spamc/spamd. All
seems to be working fine (probably as designed). The headers are
getting rewritten just fine. What I want to do is STOP the spam from
On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:02 am, Roman Serbski wrote:
Hi all,
What was the highest score you've ever seen? I received a message
yesterday that was scored with 51.9(!). =)
Since you can control the scores by setting the score for one
or several tests, I just don't see how this is in any way
Mark,
Take a look at your /etc/procmailrc file which probably controls where
your spam is being routed. This is the entry in my procmailrc file that
controls the spam to our system.
If had the entry below all you would need to do is to remove or comment
out all lines after # This
Loren Wilton wrote:
Are yoiu cc-ing yourself on the reports? I've had stupid mail systems kick
back mail I sent to people claiming 'relaying denied' if I had a cc that
wasn't at the target destinaiton.
Loren
When I want to have a 'record' copy of that sort of correspondence ...
I use bcc:
On Sunday 01 May 2005 02:26 pm, Martin G. Diehl wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
Are yoiu cc-ing yourself on the reports? I've had stupid mail systems
kick back mail I sent to people claiming 'relaying denied' if I had a cc
that wasn't at the target destinaiton.
Loren
When I want
29 matches
Mail list logo
