can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup required_score?
i already read the manual but still don't know how to
do it.
i creating a perl script that calling
Mail::SpamAssassin to check emails is it a spam or
not.
i want that i can configure the "required_score" from
my script, not from /etc/spamassa
Jamie,
The output you provided shows your running pyzor from
SpamAssassin. Have you tested your Pyzor install as
standalone?
Try this: su -l USERID
USERID should be the user that your MTA/SpamAssassin will
run as.
Then:
pyzor -d check < mailmessage | less
The output will show you any debug mess
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 05:16, forum wrote:
> I'm testing the SA but my server can't connect to outside world. Thus, i've
> to send mail from localhost to myself to find how accurate SA is.
> Unfortunately, SA don't scan mails that sent from localhost.
SA scans what you hand to it to scan. If your
I'm testing the SA but my server can't connect to
outside world. Thus, i've to send mail from localhost to myself to find how
accurate SA is.
Unfortunately, SA don't scan mails that sent from
localhost.
how can I reconfig it to scan every
mail.
really need your help
heng
[Apologies if this gets sent to the list twice, the first time it didn't
appear.]
I'm having problems reporting spam through pyzor with spamassassin -r. I'm
running SA 3.0.2 with amavisd-new and pyzor (1:0.4.0+cvs20030201-4),
razor2 (2.670) from Debian (Sid) packages, DCC (from source). Reporting
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0700, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> I've taken the actual message and removed the markup from
> SpamAssassin and run a razor-check and come up empty. This
> manual check says that the message is not listed (with and
> without the SA markup).
Razor can list both messag
Hello Devon,
Monday, May 9, 2005, 11:30:36 AM, you wrote:
DH> Many thanks to Bob on the recent SARE rules release. This
DH> caught those HTML Table SPAMS!!!
But I notice there was no description on those report lines. I'll
have that fixed by the weekend.
Bob Menschel
Hello Simon,
Monday, May 9, 2005, 2:46:15 AM, you wrote:
SB> Hi Everyone,
SB> Upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.3 today + a few of the SARE rulesets, and I'm
SB> noticing a spamd warning message in the log files occasionally that was
SB> not occuring on the test server I evaluated 3.0.3 on:
SB> May 9
At 06:26 PM 5/9/2005, Nick Gilbert wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8 required=5.0
tests=AWL,HELO_DYNAMIC_COMCAST,INFO_TLD,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL autolearn=unavailable
version=3.0.3
but:
spamc < spa
Hi All,
I configured SpamAssassin on a busy server.
It was/is working nicely but I can see lately that a lot of spam is
getting through with BAYES_00 being hit, which leads me to thing that
the Bayes database was poisoned.
So couple of questions for more knowledgable ...
1) I didn't touch any ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Gilbert wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Why do I get (VERY) different results on the same machine if I call
| spamassassin in two different ways? Eg:
|
| spamassassin -D < spam.txt
|
| Gives:
|
| X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8 required=5.0
|
tests=AWL,HELO_DYNAMI
> > On 5/7/2005 8:40 AM +0200, Rakesh wrote:
> > > http://www.coolestrxever.com; (a semicolon)
> > > http://www.coolestrxever.com, (a comma)
> > > http://www.coolestrxever.com. (a fullstop)
> > > http://www.coolestrxever.com? (a question mark)
> >
> > add constantcontact.com) to the list.
Actually
Hi,
Why do I get (VERY) different results on the same machine if I call
spamassassin in two different ways? Eg:
spamassassin -D < spam.txt
Gives:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.8 required=5.0
tests=AWL,HELO_DYNAMIC_COMCAST,INFO_TLD,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> jdow wrote:
> > From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
> >>know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I
want.
> >>
> >>I'm asking because the
jdow wrote:
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I want.
I'm asking because the question has come up about "can spamassassin
itself with NO add-ons be se
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 with Razor2 (agent 2.61).
I have a user that has had his email from his home ISP
tagged as spam when he sends to himself at work (here).
Looking at the headers shows that SpamAssassin found the
message listed in Razor2.
I've taken the actual message and removed the ma
>From a typical email:
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FM_NO_STYLE,
HTML_80_90,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TW_JC
autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
The X-Spam-Level: entry allows you to filter to /dev/null just fine.
You can even have a graduated fi
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
> know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I want.
>
> I'm asking because the question has come up about "can spamassassin
> itself with NO add-ons be set
From: "Niek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 5/7/2005 8:40 AM +0200, Rakesh wrote:
> > http://www.coolestrxever.com; (a semicolon)
> > http://www.coolestrxever.com, (a comma)
> > http://www.coolestrxever.com. (a fullstop)
> > http://www.coolestrxever.com? (a question mark)
>
> add constantcontact.com) t
Many thanks to Bob on the recent SARE rules release. This caught those HTML Table SPAMS!!!
0.05FORGED_RCVD_HELOReceived: contains a forged HELO
0.07HTML_FONT_INVISIBLEHTML font color is same as background
0.00HTML_MESSAGEHTML included in message
0.60J_CHICKENPOX_121alpha-pock-2alpha
0.60J_CHICKE
My current setup: SpamAssassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl version
5.6.1. Everyday I do an /usr/bin/sa-learn on a ham folder and a spam
folder for which users drop emails in. However this morning after
running sa-learn against the folders my nham and nspam have both dropped
below 200. Now of c
On Monday, May 9th 2005 at 12:11 -0500, quoth Dan Nelson:
=>In the last episode (May 08), Steven W. Orr said:
=>> Since I switched over to using MySQL to hold the userprefs, awl and bayes,
=>> I see that the bayes processing no longer functions.
=>>
=>> Here's the relevant bayes debug output for
The way I have sa setup is if SA exits with an error code, it will drop the
email. I don't do this, because I would much rather just mark the message as
spam and let the enduser delete it themselves. A nice feature would be if SA
could makes messages as spam for a certain score or higher and th
From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
> know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I want.
>
> I'm asking because the question has come up about "can spamassassin itself
> with NO add-ons
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I want.
I'm asking because the question has come up about "can spamassassin
itself with NO add-ons be set to delete email."
Short an
Is there any way in the stock SA install to tell it to delete email? I
know you can do it with procmail, milter, etc, but that's not what I want.
I'm asking because the question has come up about "can spamassassin
itself with NO add-ons be set to delete email."
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:39:33PM +0300, turgut kalfaoglu wrote:
> Hi there. when I "lint" the spamassassin,
> I get 1 issues, but I can't tell what it is from the log:
>
> # spamassassin --lint --debug
[...]
> debug: Excluding meta test L_BROKEN_ANTIVIRUS; unsolved meta dependencies:
> L_BROKEN
On 5/7/2005 8:40 AM +0200, Rakesh wrote:
http://www.coolestrxever.com; (a semicolon)
http://www.coolestrxever.com, (a comma)
http://www.coolestrxever.com. (a fullstop)
http://www.coolestrxever.com? (a question mark)
add constantcontact.com) to the list.
Niek
> On Friday, May 6, 2005, 3:23:56 PM, John Stewart wrote:
> > I upgraded just the other day (at which point I suspect I
> broke something)
> > as I saw on a site somewhere that 2.6.3 was vulnerable to a
> DOS attack. I
> > upgraded to 2.6.4 for SA, and 0.25 for SpamCopURI
>
> > Grepping through
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Of course, the better way to do this is not let the list mail get to SA in
> the first place.
I let SA mark all my mail. Mail from this list gets sorted out before I
sort out the spam. That way I still have the SA markup in case I want to
look at
At 10:52 AM 5/9/2005, Michael W Cocke wrote:
Isn't getting caught by this rule?
bodyMWC19 /americaspharma.com/i
describeMWC19 local rule19
score MWC19 20.0
change it from a body rule to a uri rule, also for correctness add a \ in
front of . (otherwise . is a wil
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Peuhkurinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:02 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid rule question
>
>
>Michael W Cocke wrote:
>> This is really getting on my nerves... Using Spamassassin
>3.03, could
>> someone please t
Michael W Cocke wrote:
This is really getting on my nerves... Using Spamassassin 3.03, could
someone please tell me why this message
-
Dear Customer,
We have all the rx you may need.
http://americaspharma.com/
From hard to find pain killers to diet solutions.
Thank you,
S
This is really getting on my nerves... Using Spamassassin 3.03, could
someone please tell me why this message
-
Dear Customer,
We have all the rx you may need.
http://americaspharma.com/
>From hard to find pain killers to diet solutions.
Thank you,
Supply.
-
From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, please send me a copy and I'll see if it has new manglings worth
> testing for.
I sent the body again privately. It was quoted in its entirety in the
email on the 8th at about 4:30AM. (The headers don't count. It's body
rules that gave it a miss.
Hello jdow,
Sunday, May 8, 2005, 4:21:26 AM, you wrote:
j> This text sailed right through all the SARE rules except one ratware
j> rule:
j> ===8<---
j> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0
j> tests=BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
j> RATWR10a_MESSID,URIBL_SBL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
j>
From: "Phibee Network operation Center" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> but don't see:
> body PERSO_CORPS_88 /\C_I_A_L_I_S\b/i
> score PERSO_CORPS_885
Try this:
body PERSO_CORPS_88 /C_I_A_L_I_S\b/i
{^_^}
turgut kalfaoglu wrote:
Hi there. when I "lint" the spamassassin,
I get 1 issues, but I can't tell what it is from the log:
# spamassassin --lint --debug
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.3
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
<>
debug: Excluding meta test L_BROKEN_ANTIVIRUS; unsolved meta
dependencies: L
Hi there. when I "lint" the spamassassin,
I get 1 issues, but I can't tell what it is from the log:
# spamassassin --lint --debug
debug: SpamAssassin version 3.0.3
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? yes
debug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe env vars, and resetting PATH
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Ok, right on! I fixed the trusted_networks thing, and check this out!
BTW, the jerks are using another domain.. for a new "division." my god,
CAN-SPAM is a piece of crap. How the *hell* did it get passed? Ugh.
Jonathan
Yup complete waste of time, not unlike the crud gettin
Hi
i use SpamAssassin 3.0.1 on a qmail/qmail-scanner 1.25st.
i have my list into personnal.cf
my problems that is SpamAssassin see my instruction:
header PERSO_SUJET_18 Subject =~ /New! Vìagra soft/i
score PERSO_SUJET_18 3.0
but don't see:
body PERSO_CORPS_88 /\C_I_A_
In an older episode (Monday 09 May 2005 12:08), forum wrote:
> My server uses a local ip so it can't receive real
> mails. Thus i've to feed every mail by myself.
Be aware that SA uses a lot of tests that are based on "outside" information
like Received: headers. If the mails that you feed do not
mails that i received form other servers are added with a line such as
"X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0"
This type of mail is very important for me because i'm studying the accuracy
of SA for my project. My server uses a local ip so it can't receive real
mails. Thus i've to feed every ma
Hi Everyone,
Upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.3 today + a few of the SARE rulesets, and I'm
noticing a spamd warning message in the log files occasionally that was
not occuring on the test server I evaluated 3.0.3 on:
May 9 21:41:39 mail spamd[30290]: Use of uninitialized value in
substitution (s///) a
In an older episode (Monday 09 May 2005 11:01), forum wrote:
> i use the command
> mail([EMAIL PROTECTED],"subject","message");
> and there are many keywords that affect my rules
> but when i receive it, there aren't any header from spam assassin
In other mails you receive, there are headers from
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Robert Gomezi wrote:
> I am not sure if the extra registers on the Opteron help regexp
> performance or not ?
The extra bandwidth of the opteron helps (if you run dual channel) helps
the most, as does the better cache.
Plus the opteron is better price/performance ratio than t
Hi, I've wrote php command to send an e-mail to
myself and i found that SA didn't scan it.
i use the command
mail([EMAIL PROTECTED],"subject","message");
and there are many keywords that affect my
rules
but when i receive it, there aren't any header from
spam assassin
which part of SA cod
Hi, Has anybody compared the performance of running SpamAssassin on a
dual Opteron and compared it with a dual Xeon ? Is there any
substantial performance differences ?
I am not sure if the extra registers on the Opteron help regexp
performance or not ?
Thanks Robert
On Sun 8 May 05 18:46, "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > so I whitelist on:
> > List-Id:
>
> Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
Well, I think Loren answered it, but I tend to use other filtering tools
to deal with that, so in procmail, I'd do somethi
> > so I whitelist on:
> > List-Id:
>
> Do you mind posting the exact syntax in your local.cf to do this?
Don't know about the OP's, but mine is
header WHITELIST_SA List-Id =~
/(?:dev|users)\.spamassassin\.apache\.org/i
describe WHITELIST_SA SA List
score WHITELIST_SA -100
You can simpl
50 matches
Mail list logo
