This is a little off-topic, but how do spammers expect to make money
from that spam? Do they expect we would buy stocks from them? Is it
I suspect the answer is 'yes'. And some people probably will.
When you pay virtually nothing for your advertizing to hundreds of millions
of people
On 6/24/2005 5:15 AM +0200, Charles Read wrote:
Howdy!
I have unfortunately had many addresses learned in the AWL rule. How
can I start from scratch... that is delete my auto white list database?
man rm
Niek Baakman
Hi, I am using spamassassin and store the user preferences in an SQL database.
That works for simple options, like required_hits, since this has a key
(required_hits) and a value (5.0 for example).
But how about preferences where the key is composed of multiple parts, like
rewrite_header
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Loren Wilton spake:
Also from almost complete ignorance: it seems unlikely since 3.0.
Previously the bayes database had the actual tokens and counts in it. Since
3.0 the database has a hash of the token. I don't konw that the hashes from
two different systems would end
Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700:
X-Message-ID:
106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116
Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly.
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in
tracking? Or does it correspond
Dr Robert Young wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:04:57 -0400:
So when using CPAN to get Sys::Syslog with Perl 5.8.3, it states that
it requires Perl 5.8.7 as a depedancy.
Just checking to be sure that the later version of Perl is needed if
one is intending to use SA 2.6 and/or 3.0 with
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700:
X-Message-ID:
106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116
Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly.
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message
Jdow wrote on Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:58:22 -0700:
X-Message-ID:
106.100.111.119.64.101.97.114.116.104.108.105.110.107.46.110.101.116
Which is merely my email address encoded stupidly.
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in
tracking? Or does it
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in
tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug?
List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can
remove the address from the list, even if the report is something like
Spamcop that attempts to remove
I have the stock sa-stats.pl script, but I'm more familiar w/ PHP when
it comes to scripting, so when it comes to expressions in Perl I'm
pretty lost.
It seems to be an easy enough modification for someone who knows perl to
modify the script to accept another argument, that is, the domain you
Aaaah, clever, thank you, both!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de http://msie.winware.org
Hi, I am using spamassassin and store the user preferences in
an SQL database.
That works for simple options, like required_hits, since this
has a key (required_hits) and a value (5.0 for example).
But how about preferences where the key is composed of
multiple parts, like
Hi Carlo,
back in May you wrote:
Moreover, you might want to firewall (or reject their mail
otherwise before it reaches spamassassin) all of South Korea and
all of China -- that will reduce the ammount of spam you
receive with about 99% ... So, it is more than worth it.
When I
You might want to take a look at this:
http://www.blackholes.us/
Very useful for inclusion into RBLs if you so desire. I myself am not
very keen at all on blocking entire countries, but the option is there
if you need/want it.
Regards,
Martyn
Andy Spiegl wrote:
Hi Carlo,
back
There are two fairly obvious possibilities here:
1.Your server isn't normally running with net tests enabled, but they
were for the manual test.
Why would that be?
2.You ran the manual test 1/2hr after the automatic scan, and by then
the domain had made it into all of the
Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Wills wrote:
Does anyone have a ruleset for catching any or all of these stock tips?
This is a little off-topic, but how do spammers expect to make money
from that spam?
A lot of them are pump and dump schemes, I suspect. The spammer buys
a bunch of shares of some
Hallo und guten Tag Andy,
Heute (am 24.06.2005 - 15:38 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
When I read this I thought it's overkill but in the meantime and after
looking at my logs (not only from SA but also ssh-attacks) I DO think that
it's a good idea to block these IPs.
take a look at
Hello,
One message have these headers:
From: Sucesu - RS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And the SA whitelist have this record:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes
But SA action is:
Jun 24 00:03:05 MailScanner[14910]: Message
Joao Gazzoni wrote:
Hello,
One message have these headers:
From: Sucesu - RS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And the SA whitelist have this record:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes
That's not a spamassassin whitelist entry. It's a
Erwin Zavala wrote:
X-Spam-Flag should be the default.
In fact, AFAIK it's impossible to have SA generate a X_Spam_* header, it's got a
hard-coded X-Spam- prefix that can't be changed.
have
there been problems doing this?
RDJ will not restart the daemon or even keep changed rulesets
if the lint returns an error. So, running it via a cron job is safe.
It depends on how you're running SA. If you're using amavisd and you
specify a restart script, make sure it restarts
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 14:13 -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:54 AM Thursday, 6/23/2005, John Horne wrote -=
Hello,
We have been running RDJ manually, but are now considering running it
via cron. The problem is what if something 'goes wrong'? This is on a
central mailhub, and we do not want the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loren Wilton writes:
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in
tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug?
List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can
remove the address from the
Hello,
According to the lastest announce, SpamAssassin from version 3.0.1 to
3.0.3 is subject to a Denial of Service Vulnerability.
This french advisory says it concerns prior versions of 3.0.3.
http://www.certa.ssi.gouv.fr/site/CERTA-2005-AVI-225/index.html
So is Spamassassin 3.0.0
-Original Message-
From: John Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 12:44 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: RDJ from cron - is it safe?
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 14:13 -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:54 AM Thursday, 6/23/2005, John Horne wrote -=
Hello,
We have been
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:45:52PM +0200, Tuyen DINH wrote:
According to the lastest announce, SpamAssassin from version 3.0.1 to
3.0.3 is subject to a Denial of Service Vulnerability.
So is Spamassassin 3.0.0 vulnerable ?
Is 3.0.0 between 3.0.1 and 3.0.3 ? ;)
--
Randomly Generated
David Brodbeck wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Wills wrote:
Does anyone have a ruleset for catching any or all of these stock tips?
This is a little off-topic, but how do spammers expect to make money
from that spam?
A lot of them are pump and dump schemes, I suspect. The spammer
Aaron Grewell wrote:
It depends on how you're running SA. If you're using amavisd and you
specify a restart script, make sure it restarts both amavisd and postfix.
there is no need to restart postfix.
Otherwise the two can stop talking to each other, and your mail will get
held up until
At 09:30 AM Friday, 6/24/2005, you wrote -=
have
there been problems doing this?
RDJ will not restart the daemon or even keep changed rulesets
if the lint returns an error. So, running it via a cron job is safe.
It depends on how you're running SA. If you're using amavisd and you
specify
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:45:52PM +0200, Tuyen DINH wrote:
According to the lastest announce, SpamAssassin from version 3.0.1 to
3.0.3 is subject to a Denial of Service Vulnerability.
So is Spamassassin 3.0.0 vulnerable ?
Is 3.0.0 between 3.0.1 and 3.0.3 ? ;)
I
John Horne wrote:
Many thanks for all the replies, which all seem positive.
However, we have been seeing problems with restarting the daemon
recently, which is why I am wary about starting to run RDJ from cron. In
trying to restart spamassassin, on a fedora core 4 and core 3 system, we
see:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see the advantage of this. How does a *message header* help in
tracking? Or does it correspond with a web bug?
List washing. When they actually get a complaint about spam, they can
remove the address from the list, even if the report is
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:45:52PM +0200, Tuyen DINH wrote:
According to the lastest announce, SpamAssassin from version 3.0.1 to
3.0.3 is subject to a Denial of Service Vulnerability.
So is Spamassassin 3.0.0 vulnerable ?
error: Insecure dependency in eval while running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 2119._
, continuing
Ayup - another one of those horrid problems.
I am running 3.04 with spamd and spamc. I get this on full rules.
However, I do not get it all the
What ever happened to Louisville CO 80027 spam?
Did they change their scheme? Get Prosecuted?
Rob McEwen
PowerView Systems
35 matches
Mail list logo
