Re: Still need to work on Mail SpamAssassin 3.1.0

The Doctor wrote on Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:22:02 -0600: Next suggestion? Take a long sleep and ask yourself if the attitude you are currently showing will get you any further. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center:

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

It seems you are not using *any* custom rules. You may want to check out RDJ and SARE. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de http://msie.winware.org

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Kai Schaetzl schrieb: It seems you are not using *any* custom rules. You may want to check out RDJ and SARE. Kai I've found in my debugging infos the part, where Razor wasnt be able to read its config file. This part i've corrected with positive debugging infos. Hope it's working now.

subject - why not all caps?

I just received this spam (some of them really get their stuff translated well now) but was surprised that it did not trigger subject all caps rule Wolfgang Hamann Received: (qmail 13636 invoked by uid 94); 9 Jul 2005 16:00:06 - Received: from 127.0.0.1 by amadeus3 (envelope-from

Re: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

That, sir, appears to be a problem with your milter or sendmail config. What does that second entry mean to you? {^_^} - Original Message - From: Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: 2005 July, 09, Saturday 05:06 Subject: Just upgraded to SA3.0.4

SURBL, SA 3.0.4, and firewalls

Is there any information available on what configuration your firewall needs in order to make use of SURBL in SA 3.0.4? Forts, etc??

Re: subject - why not all caps?

At 12:38 PM 7/9/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just received this spam (some of them really get their stuff translated well now) but was surprised that it did not trigger subject all caps rule From the eval test code for that rule: # don't match one word subjects Since

Re: SURBL, SA 3.0.4, and firewalls

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:47:22PM -0400, Dr Robert Young wrote: Is there any information available on what configuration your firewall needs in order to make use of SURBL in SA 3.0.4? Forts, etc?? SURBL needs DNS to function. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Cop: He's making a break for it.

Re: subject - why not all caps?

Hi Matt, thanks for your reply. It seems these guys know how SA treats their messages :( There have been discussions before about amplifying rules, but I am not sure whether it is possible. I would say that both english and german versions of this BUSINESS PROPOSAL share a few

md5sum/sha1sum signatures available, was RE: Gif-Only spams

Good evening, all, On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Chris Santerre wrote: From: Sven Riedel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:19 AM has anyone developed a good strategy against spams that contain a random text and the actual spam in an image within a multipart/alternative mail?