2005/9/1, jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For the installation here, two experienced computer users, I have a pair
> of folders on the Linux SpamAssassin machine for each user in the user's
> $HOME/Mail directory. I have the dovecot pop3/imap server for extracting
> mail from the system. We prefer the
Linux: Fedora Core 4 (upgrade from 3)
sendmail: 8.13.4-2
spamassassin: 3.0.4-1
spamass-milter: 0.3.0-8
---
It has run for a day and now it stopped working.
I'm currently having the same problems as described here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sp
Hello Adrian,
Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 4:10:29 PM, you wrote:
AM> debug: PATH included '/root/bin', which doesn't exist, dropping.
Were you running as user = root? $HOME/bin is normally included in
the SA $PATH, if it exists. If it doesn't exist, no harm done.
AM> debug: diag: module not in
Hello Rob,
Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 12:04:03 PM, you wrote:
RMPS> SEE:
RMPS> http://pvsys.com/busted01.txt
RMPS> This was sent to an e-mail address for a client of mine's
RMPS> former employee. ...
RMPS> A few days ago, this box recieved what appears to be an
RMPS> option confi
Adrian Mak wrote:
the train byans learn spam, we can use sa-learn to pass a spam or non-spam email
I know that some webmail e.g. squirrelmail, has such feature that
allow user to mark an email is a spam/non-spam so that next time the
same originate email will not marked as spam.
But if email cli
For the installation here, two experienced computer users, I have a pair
of folders on the Linux SpamAssassin machine for each user in the user's
$HOME/Mail directory. I have the dovecot pop3/imap server for extracting
mail from the system. We prefer the folder system that OE allows with
pop3 conn
the train byans learn spam, we can use sa-learn to pass a spam or non-spam email
I know that some webmail e.g. squirrelmail, has such feature that
allow user to mark an email is a spam/non-spam so that next time the
same originate email will not marked as spam.
But if email clients like outlook ex
Adrian Mak wrote:
> my mailsystem is using spamassassin 3.0.4
> when I performed spamassassin --lint -D
> I saw some strange message.
>
> debug: PATH included '/root/bin', which doesn't exist, dropping.
harmless. It's debug information and you're only seeing this because you
specified -D.
> debu
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:10:29AM +0800, Adrian Mak wrote:
> here is the spamassassin local.cf
[...]
> sa-learn --sync
>
> when I performed spamassassin --lint -D
> I saw some strange message.
>
> debug: PATH included '/root/bin', which doesn't exist, dropping.
> debug: diag: module not installe
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ryan Castellucci wrote:
>
>>I'm running spamassassin 3.0.2 on debian sarge, and this message getts
>>flagged with FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD and it's a legit message from yahoo.
>>
>>http://ryanc.org/junk/yahoo_fp.msg.gz
>>
>
>
> Perhaps you should consider running 3.0.4, which has
my mailsystem is using spamassassin 3.0.4
here is the spamassassin local.cf
trusted_networks 61.129.115.29
dcc_home /var/dcc
razor config /var/amavis/.razor/razor-agent.conf
bayes_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes
auto_whitelist_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
lock_method flock
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
> I'm running spamassassin 3.0.2 on debian sarge, and this message getts
> flagged with FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD and it's a legit message from yahoo.
>
> http://ryanc.org/junk/yahoo_fp.msg.gz
>
Perhaps you should consider running 3.0.4, which has this fixed?
http://bugzilla.spa
Irina wrote:
Hello All,
Below is my old message I've posted. And a suggestion from Justin Mason.
We have no solution yet. We had another glitch today.
I passed a message to spamassassin with -t flag for debugging. It generated
perl.core. I then shortened the message to only headers and tes
I'm running spamassassin 3.0.2 on debian sarge, and this message getts
flagged with FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD and it's a legit message from yahoo.
http://ryanc.org/junk/yahoo_fp.msg.gz
--
Ryan Castellucci http://ryanc.org/
On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:37 PM, John Rudd wrote:
On Aug 31, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ok. I thought that might be the case, but I wasn't sure. The
--add-addr-to-blacklist entry in the man page states that it is added
with a high score, but the --add-addr-to-
On Aug 31, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ok. I thought that might be the case, but I wasn't sure. The
--add-addr-to-blacklist entry in the man page states that it is added
with a high score, but the --add-addr-to-whitelist entry doesn't
mention score.
The use o
Thomas Deliduka wrote:
Ah, Gotcha. So, how can I simply empty out the AWL? I want it reverted to
nothing so I can start fresh.
rm $HOME/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist*
Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>
> Ok. I thought that might be the case, but I wasn't sure. The
> --add-addr-to-blacklist entry in the man page states that it is added
> with a high score, but the --add-addr-to-whitelist entry doesn't
> mention score.
>
> The use of the word "whitelist" in the man page
Quoth Theo:
Sure. You can do anything in a plugin. :)
Retorteth jdow:
Sure you can if you are fluent in silly write only languages or have
the time to waste to become so. I am not and do not have the time.
Backwards speak randomly not I do well, either. I perl inaccessible
find.
{^_^}
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > Reading the man page raises another (somewhat related)
> > question, tho.
> >
> >--add-addr-to-whitelist
> >Add the named email address to the automatic whitelist.
> >Note that you must be running "sp
Hello All,
Below is my old message I've posted. And a suggestion from Justin Mason.
We have no solution yet. We had another glitch today.
I passed a message to spamassassin with -t flag for debugging. It generated
perl.core. I then shortened the message to only headers and tested again.
It d
Ah, Gotcha. So, how can I simply empty out the AWL? I want it reverted to
nothing so I can start fresh.
On 8/31/05 3:08 PM this was written:
> Thomas Deliduka wrote:
>> How do you simply clear out the entire AWL? I don't know where it is
>> physically located.
>>
>> I tried spamassassin -R but
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:41:39PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
Debian packages or 3.1.0-rc2 are available from the experimental
distibution (version 3.0.99pre3.1.0+rc2-1). I'd appreciate help
testing them, so that all the bugs in the packaging can be worked out
by the
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Reading the man page raises another (somewhat related) question, tho.
>
>--add-addr-to-whitelist
>Add the named email address to the automatic whitelist. Note that
>you must be running "spamassassin" or "spamd" with the auto-
>whitelist enabled.
Thomas Deliduka wrote:
> How do you simply clear out the entire AWL? I don't know where it is
> physically located.
>
> I tried spamassassin -R but it just hangs with -D it just stops after it
> loads the bayes stuff.
>
Yeah.. did you feed it a message? As standard input?
-R, aka --remove-from
hp.com / atdmt.com busted??
SEE:
http://pvsys.com/busted01.txt
This was sent to an e-mail address for a client of mine's former employee.
After this employee left my client's company MANY months ago, they asked me to
turn her mailbox off because of the "large" amount of spam recieved at that
f
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > I have a particular address which has been learned incorrectly by
> > the AWL. I have added a custom rule to catch these spams, but the
> > AWL is currently deducting about 2.2 points from each one (the
> > last one went from 6.3 to 4.1 because of the AWL). Is there any
How do you simply clear out the entire AWL? I don't know where it is
physically located.
I tried spamassassin -R but it just hangs with -D it just stops after it
loads the bayes stuff.
On 8/31/05 2:29 PM this was written:
> At 11:21 AM Wednesday, 8/31/2005, Matt Kettler wrote -=>
>> Bowie Baile
At 11:21 AM Wednesday, 8/31/2005, Matt Kettler wrote -=>
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I have a particular address which has been learned incorrectly by the AWL.
> I have added a custom rule to catch these spams, but the AWL is currently
> deducting about 2.2 points from each one (the last one went from
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I have a particular address which has been learned incorrectly by the AWL.
> I have added a custom rule to catch these spams, but the AWL is currently
> deducting about 2.2 points from each one (the last one went from 6.3 to 4.1
> because of the AWL). Is there any way to remo
I have a particular address which has been learned incorrectly by the AWL.
I have added a custom rule to catch these spams, but the AWL is currently
deducting about 2.2 points from each one (the last one went from 6.3 to 4.1
because of the AWL). Is there any way to remove an address from the AWL o
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:49:05AM -0700, jdow wrote:
> Is it possible to build a rule that reads an environmental variable
> such as "$USER". If so how might that be done.
Sure. You can do anything in a plugin. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Bender: "I came here with a simple dream, a dream
Just to post back to the group on this one. It turns out the reason why
these were not working is because the user that amavisd ran as didn't have
permissions to see the directory that contained Net::DNS::Resolver For some
reason cpan installed it with root only permissions.
After I fixed the che
Bob Proulx wrote:
jdow wrote:
Is it found in a handy place in CPAN?
{^_^}
Because CPAN is for released modules (I am talking designed process
and not observed quality here) I don't see how it could get there
until it is actually released.
CPAN does have a way for tagging a "Developer Relea
jdow wrote:
> Is it found in a handy place in CPAN?
> {^_^}
Because CPAN is for released modules (I am talking designed process
and not observed quality here) I don't see how it could get there
until it is actually released.
If you are installing by CPAN and not using a package manager then
using
At 02:44 AM 8/31/2005, Beast wrote:
3. I have train hundreds (or thousands) spam/ham mail to sa-learn but it
seems it still not quite good detecting non-english mail.
Because SpamAssassin is based on the english language. SpamAssassin
doesn't know that in (example) Language X that "blahblahbla
At 01:58 AM 8/31/2005, Beast wrote:
---
Received: from notes.trakindo.co.id (notes.trakindo.co.id [202.152.6.165])
by mail.indorama.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F50E7932
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:15:29 +0700 (WIT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "My User" <[EMAIL
Thanks for the input all!
ok ive read around but im gettin nowhere fast.
I want to make sure im getting the best from my AWL setup.
I have queried the MySQL where the DB is stored and i have 1000 records.
I dont see many references to the AWL in the spams that get tagged, what
are the MySQL commands to prune, check that
Is it possible to build a rule that reads an environmental variable
such as "$USER". If so how might that be done. (And if not, this needs
to be zilla-ed.) For Earthlink users there are some really nice tricks
you can do to filter a significant spam fraction. But they need the
"$USER" to make it g
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 05:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Got a nasty spam with an extremly oversized Thread-Index header. (I set
> my word wrap to 72 characters, I don't know if it will hold up however
> when I hit send).
>
> Does anyone know if it is exploiting a known Outlook/Exchange secu
Is it found in a handy place in CPAN?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Might have to handle these things with procmail level tools.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Got a nasty spam with an extremly oversized Thread-Index header. (I set
my word wrap to 72 characters, I don't know if it will hold up however
when I hit send).
Does anyo
43 matches
Mail list logo
