> I was told that I can use spamassassin to do Content Checking but I
> see no evidence of it as yet.
That may depend on what you mean by "content checking"
SA is a tool for classifying spam. You seem to have tried it on a virus. A
virus really isn't spam, it is a virus. SA makes little attemp
Hello jdow,
Thursday, October 6, 2005, 12:35:15 AM, you wrote:
j> From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> SARE's URI rules files and HTML rules files have been updated. ...
>>
>> Both sets include the migration of rules incorporated into 3.1.0 into
>> new 70_sare_*_x31.cf files. If you
At 08:57 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
It would be food for this list. Which makes it rather silly that the
Apache sysadmins insist on spam filtering the list.
{^_-}
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DoYouWantMySpam
A spam message got through! Can I send it to you so you can update the filters?
It would be food for this list. Which makes it rather silly that the
Apache sysadmins insist on spam filtering the list.
{^_-}
From: "Alex Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That would be ironic ;-)
On 10/6/05, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 07:49 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
>My post was r
I'm new to the world of Linux, trying to come up with a replacement
for GFI's Mail Essentials and Mail Security by setting up Ubuntu v5.10
with Postfix v2.2.4, Spamassassin v3.0.4-2, Clamav v0.87-1 and
Amavisd-new v0.1.6.9-1. I've found a couple of useful tutorials on
getting things working but I
That would be ironic ;-)
On 10/6/05, Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:49 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
> >My post was rejected as spam - just making sure i can post
>
> Did you try to forward spam to the list? :)
>
> Evan
>
>
At 07:49 PM 10/6/2005, you wrote:
My post was rejected as spam - just making sure i can post
Did you try to forward spam to the list? :)
Evan
My post was rejected as spam - just making sure i can post
Rod,
good idea.
I should have mentioned - the upgrade was over a month
ago - at which time I migrated the bayes db.
Perhaps I can export/import the bayes db, and see
if it changes the outcome.
my gut feel is the even if the spam db is different,
the new spamassassin/bayes behaves differently
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(please to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as the list
please)
I recently upgraded and now I am getting spam through, with vary
obvious rude words in the subject and body. I have narrowed down the
difference in bayes results.
I am now running
SpamAssassin
Hi,
(please to reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as well as the list please)
I recently upgraded and now I am getting
spam through, with vary obvious rude words in the subject and body. I have
narrowed down the difference in bayes results.
I am now running
SpamAssassin version 3.0.4
running on Perl
I'm running SpamAssassin on FreeBSD 4.9, with perl 5.6.1, and I'll be
hooking it up to qmail once it's working properly. :)
I upgraded from SA-3.0.4 to SA-3.1.0 today, and the make seemed to work
fine, but starting spamd spews forth copious error messages that are
included at the bottom of this e-
-Original Message-
From: "Joe Woltering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin Mailing List"
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:00:27 -0400
Subject: MAILER-DAEMON messages
> I've been running SA with great success for a couple of months now. Now
> it
> seems that the bulk of my spam is being sent t
Trying to upgrade to 3.1 here and have all the modules installed with
the exception of the Mail::DomainKeys modules.
I've tried the install from CPAN as well as from the tar.gz with the
similar results of:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-DomainKeys-0.23]# perl Makefile.PL
You appear to be directly conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Bronger writes:
> Hallöchen!
>
> I sent a test mail to myself which included
>
> X-Hashcash:
> 1:26:051006:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]::GydjlgtM9KXnHYAH:000493gL
>
> in the header (generated by "hashcash"). However, t
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:28:48AM +0100, John Hodson wrote:
> I have solved this problem with the help of suggestions from Rick
> Macdougall, Matthew Newton, and Bob Menchal. Thanks chaps!
Excellent!
> suggestions were using spamassassin -D to debug, corrupt Rule in .cf file,
> and corrupt bayes
Hi,
I've been running SA
with great success for a couple of months now. Now it seems that the bulk of my
spam is being sent to the MAILER-DAEMON account for my domain. I imagine this is
a common technique used by spammers. Is there an effective way of blocking these
messages without interr
I had a FP fro domain_ratio today I was wondering if someone could explain
to me how this works so that I can avoid it in the future.
thanks
Steven Lamb
Thanks to everyone who was willing to take the time to respond, and
educate me on this issue. Michele, thanks for posting the SA_RULE
for the config file. This has fixed my problem.
-Original Message-
From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesda
Hallöchen!
I sent a test mail to myself which included
X-Hashcash:
1:26:051006:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::GydjlgtM9KXnHYAH:000493gL
in the header (generated by "hashcash"). However, the Spamassassin
header says
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SARE's URI rules files and HTML rules files have been updated.
URI rules files were updated early this morning. They had a --lint
error in them at first, but that has been corrected. The HTML files
have been updated this evening (and may not be avai
21 matches
Mail list logo
