Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:52 PM 12/16/2005, Thomas Manson wrote: Hi, spamassassin replace these kind of character by X in mail subject, how can i correct this? (by specifing a charset?) That's pretty weird. I've never seen or heard of any version of SA do that before. Are you sure it's SA that's doing it?

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Manson
Andrzej Adam Filip told me that it was probably Cyrus that was doing this and i've to set munge8bit to 0 in imapd.conf. I'll try tomorrow (i'm late in buying Xmas presents :op) I'll give feedback. Manson Thomas On 12/17/05, Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:52 PM 12/16/2005, Thomas

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 14:43 Thomas Manson wrote: Andrzej Adam Filip told me that it was probably Cyrus that was doing this and i've to set munge8bit to 0 in imapd.conf. I'll try tomorrow (i'm late in buying Xmas presents :op) I'll give feedback. Yes, please report back then! I have

perl error

2005-12-17 Thread Steven Stern
I just installed an update for Perl for Fedora 4 and now... Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object version 1.14 does not match bootstrap parameter 1.18 at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/XSLoader.pm line 92. Dec 17 11:08:02 mooch spamd[3144]: List::Util object

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Manson
I've just tried munge8bit:0 and I still have accent issue... here is my master.cf *** smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin #smtpsinet n - n - - smtpd

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread hamann . w
On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 14:43 Thomas Manson wrote: Andrzej Adam Filip told me that it was probably Cyrus that was doing this and i've to set munge8bit to 0 in imapd.conf. I'll try tomorrow (i'm late in buying Xmas presents :op) I'll give feedback. Yes, please report back

Re: Scoring for MAPS

2005-12-17 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Matt Kettler wrote on Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:59:20 -0500: Kai, I beg to differ. I know :-) Most zombies ARE in the DULs and/or XBL. If you greylist on DULs and XBL you'll get most of the zombies. This is because about 90% of the zombies out there are home-user high-speed Internet

[OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Pollywog
For about two weeks, I have noticed something very odd. I get connections from mail servers (mostly in Germany) and each server tries to send one spam to a nonexistent user, then a different server (often at a university in Germany) will try with a different recipient, then a few seconds

Re: [OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Matt Kettler
Pollywog wrote: For about two weeks, I have noticed something very odd. I get connections from mail servers (mostly in Germany) and each server tries to send one spam to a nonexistent user, then a different server (often at a university in Germany) will try with a different recipient, then

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 18:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the X is definitely caused by cyrus, but the munge8bit option is not present at least in my 2.2.12 install There is, however, reject8bits /* If enabled, lmtpd rejects messages with 8-bit characters in the    headers.  

Postfix, ClamAV, and SA

2005-12-17 Thread Chris
Can a mail server just be Postfix, ClamAV, and SA without the need for Mailscanner or Amavis? If so - I would like to see a how-to is someone has one. -- Best regards, Chris Most people want to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch.

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Thomas Manson wrote: I've just tried munge8bit:0 and I still have accent issue... [...] 1) I think there should be space after : munge8bit: 0 2) Have you restarted cyrus server after changing the configuration? -- [en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Jeff Chan
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, 12:56:47 PM, Pollywog Pollywog wrote: On 12/17/2005 07:19 pm, Matt Kettler wrote: Spammers of any decent sophistication have rather extensive networks of zombies at their disposal that the can co-ordinate. Does this surprise you at all? Yes, because spammers

Re: éčŕů.... replaced by X by cyrus-imapd

2005-12-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] HI, the X is definitely caused by cyrus, but the munge8bit option is not present at least in my 2.2.12 install There is, however, reject8bits /* If enabled, lmtpd rejects messages with 8-bit characters in the headers. Otherwise, 8-bit characters are

Re: Postfix, ClamAV, and SA

2005-12-17 Thread mouss
Chris a écrit : Can a mail server just be Postfix, ClamAV, and SA without the need for Mailscanner or Amavis? If so - I would like to see a how-to is someone has one. yes, but why? you can use clamsmtp[d] for clamav. but if you're using SA, then amavisd-new is recommended. It will run SA

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassa ssin

2005-12-17 Thread Andrzej Adam Filip
Michael Monnerie wrote: On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 18:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the X is definitely caused by cyrus, but the munge8bit option is not present at least in my 2.2.12 install There is, however, reject8bits /* If enabled, lmtpd rejects messages with 8-bit characters in the

Load ldap prefs

2005-12-17 Thread Philip S. Hempel
I am looking at my logs as to the reason why ldap prefs are not loading I see this Can't call method bind on an undefined value at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/LDAP.pm line 161, GEN252 line 2 ldap: failed to load user scores from LDAP server, ignored I have libdbd-ldap-perl 0.07

Re: Novice question regarding mail server identity check

2005-12-17 Thread mouss
List Mail User a écrit : [snip] Leave the FQDN part out and you can try to base an argument on 2821, but there sections 2.3.4 and 2.3.5 simply and clearly states that Domain names are used as names of hosts and of other entities in the domain name hierarchy. So there seems little left to

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 22:39 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: Do you use default setting for report_safe? (1) I have some SPAM honeypot e-mail addresses that are not checked, they just collect and are unmodified (excluded in amavis), because I don't need them checked, obviously. Too bad cyrus

Re: Novice question regarding mail server identity check

2005-12-17 Thread hamann . w
List Mail User wrote on Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:39:50 -0800 (PST): But included in the list are all of the HotPop domains and most if not all are in violation of RFC 2821 and probably of 1123 and other message related ones. And most if not all would also have a hard time to get over

Re: [OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Loren Wilton
Does this surprise you at all? Yes, because spammers are stupid Not ALL spammers are stupid. They probably don't even consider themselves unethical; but that is a side discussion. I would say in general that there are two classes of spammers: those that can make and/or very effectively use

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Manson
In fact it seems that it really was cyrus, as thunderbird was always running, i recieved a X'ed mail before the reloading of cyrus. Now it works well... sorry :o) On 17 Dec 2005 17:57:51 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Samstag, 17. Dezember 2005 14:43 Thomas Manson wrote:

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2005 02:11 Thomas Manson wrote: In fact it seems that it really was cyrus, as thunderbird was always running, i recieved a X'ed mail before the reloading of cyrus. Now it works well... sorry ..with munge8bits? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ---

Re: éèàù.... replaced by X by Spamassassin

2005-12-17 Thread Thomas Manson
yes, that's the only change i've made (add 'munge8bit: 0') On 12/18/05, Michael Monnerie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2005 02:11 Thomas Manson wrote: In fact it seems that it really was cyrus, as thunderbird was always running, i recieved a X'ed mail before the reloading

Re: [OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Matt Kettler
At 03:56 PM 12/17/2005, Pollywog wrote: On 12/17/2005 07:19 pm, Matt Kettler wrote: Spammers of any decent sophistication have rather extensive networks of zombies at their disposal that the can co-ordinate. Does this surprise you at all? Yes, because spammers are stupid and I had not seen

RE: [OT] distributed spamming

2005-12-17 Thread Steven Manross
REALLY OT: Sure, some of them are stupid, but not all are. Isn't that statement true of all stereotypes.. Women... Geeks.. Nerds... Men... Windows Admins (who write perl scripts -- me), Etc, etc, so forth, so on? (not stupidity...) In general stereotypes are created out of frustration