On Friday 06 January 2006 01:11, jdow wrote:
>Seems he's been tagged for $11.2 BILLION for sending 280 million
>spams to a small Iowa based ISP.
>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28733
>http://www.qctimes.net/articles/2006/01/04/news/local/doc43bb692ac9e86
>281138542.txt#top
>
>And he's apparent
Poor Baby.
jdow wrote:
Seems he's been tagged for $11.2 BILLION for sending 280 million
spams to a small Iowa based ISP.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28733
http://www.qctimes.net/articles/2006/01/04/news/local/doc43bb692ac9e86281138542.txt#top
And he's apparently unknown to Rokso!
Seems he's been tagged for $11.2 BILLION for sending 280 million
spams to a small Iowa based ISP.
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28733
http://www.qctimes.net/articles/2006/01/04/news/local/doc43bb692ac9e86281138542.txt#top
And he's apparently unknown to Rokso!
{O.O}
Hi
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a dedicated linux server. Spamd is
running as a daemon and allowing connections from 4 mail servers.
Every few hours, spamd will just stop responding, without any errors in
its logfiles. Whenever this happends I run a netstat -an on the server
and I see lots
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Ken A wrote:
Is there any way to ask spamassassin what the score of a particular
rule is? I have rules here and there, and would like to be able to
easily look up the score of a rule without grepping all over the
place.
Pass a mail that you know triggers
This isnt backscatter though. The only message body is the spam, no info
about bouncing at all. Im familiar with the backscatter as my users:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really gets a ton of it (duh).
This is just spam coming in from nobody with 2 from lines and a body that is
pure junk, not mailer daemon
Kris Deugau wrote:
> Ken A wrote:
> > Is there any way to ask spamassassin what the score of a particular
> > rule is? I have rules here and there, and would like to be able to
> > easily look up the score of a rule without grepping all over the
> > place.
>
> Pass a mail that you know triggers th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is slightly off topic, but im sure everyone here might have thoughts on
> it.
>
> I have over 9300 instances of empty "from" lines so far this week, for
> example:
>
> Jan 5 16:36:46 mail sendmail[7568]: k05LajgX007568: from=<>, size=1578,
> class=0, nrcpts=1, msg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is slightly off topic, but im sure everyone here might have thoughts on
it.
I have over 9300 instances of empty "from" lines so far this week, for
example:
Jan 5 16:36:46 mail sendmail[7568]: k05LajgX007568: from=<>, size=1578,
class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=, proto=SMT
Ken A wrote:
> Is there any way to ask spamassassin what the score of a particular rule
> is? I have rules here and there, and would like to be able to easily
> look up the score of a rule without grepping all over the place.
> Ideas?
Well, for the "stock rules" that come with SA you only need to
This is slightly off topic, but im sure everyone here might have thoughts on
it.
I have over 9300 instances of empty "from" lines so far this week, for
example:
Jan 5 16:36:46 mail sendmail[7568]: k05LajgX007568: from=<>, size=1578,
class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA,
relay=pool-1
Ken A wrote:
> Is there any way to ask spamassassin what the score of a particular
> rule is? I have rules here and there, and would like to be able to
> easily look up the score of a rule without grepping all over the
> place.
Pass a mail that you know triggers the rule in question through
spamas
Is there any way to ask spamassassin what the score of a particular rule
is? I have rules here and there, and would like to be able to easily
look up the score of a rule without grepping all over the place.
Ideas?
Thanks,
Ken
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 12:23 PM 1/5/2006, you wrote:
>
>> Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email..
>>
>> For example, if you accidentally sent mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>> you'd get a
>> bounce back, and you'd probably want to know about it.
>
>
> Ok, I should have clarified.. There's a
* Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm getting quite a bit of spam with
> Return-Path: <>
> in the headers.
>
> Will I likely see valid e-mail with this?
Yes, bounces.
> Searching my previous mail, it appears to all be bounce warnings.
Yes, legitimate mail
> If so, what's the best way to jus
At 12:23 PM 1/5/2006, you wrote:
Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email..
For example, if you accidentally sent mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
you'd get a
bounce back, and you'd probably want to know about it.
Ok, I should have clarified.. There's a FEW I'm seeing with the null
return p
Evan Platt wrote:
> I'm getting quite a bit of spam with
> Return-Path: <>
> in the headers.
>
> Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail, it
> appears to all be bounce warnings.
Well, bounce warnings are in fact valid email..
For example, if you accidentally sent mai
I'm getting quite a bit of spam with
Return-Path: <>
in the headers.
Will I likely see valid e-mail with this? Searching my previous mail,
it appears to all be bounce warnings.
If so, what's the best way to just blackhole this? I have postfix, and put
/Return-Path: <>/ Reject in the header_che
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just for the records. I found the problem.
Typo in SWITCHRC statement in /etc/procmailrc
Thanks for the help.
Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chem.utoronto.ca
PGP public key: http://pgp.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 13:36 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
>
> My configuration:
>
> Quad Opteron 2GHz with 8GB RAM.
> RHEL 4
> spamassassin-3.0.4-1.el4
> procmail-3.22-14
>
> My version of spamd does not recognize option --round-robin
>
Frank,
Looks like I was not much help. I have not had any
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
>
>Hello Guys,
>
>I have SA running with amavisd/postfix. I also have several
> external users with dinamic IP addresses which are allowed to relay
> using my server because they authenticate, i have SASL running.
>
>The problem is that right after pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:08:53 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:31 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 200
Screaming Eagle wrote:
> I just got spamassassin 3.x to work with sendmail. I want to know how to
> integrate clamav with it.
>
> Thanks.
If you want to directly integrate clamav in to spamassassin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
I personally don't go that route, I use MailSc
I just got spamassassin 3.x to work with sendmail. I want to know how to integrate clamav with it.
Thanks.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:31 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On
Screaming Eagle wrote:
> All,
> I have set required_score to 8.0 and restarted spamd. But new email
> coming in is showing a require of 4.5:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
> autolearn=no
> version=3.1.0
It could be in a user_prefs file, or any other conf
All,
I have set required_score to 8.0 and restarted spamd. But new email coming in is showing a require of 4.5:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=3.1.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:40:27 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:11:42 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
>>
>> >Probably you h
Billy Huddleston wrote:
> Is their a way to get the URI's to look at stuff like this?? I'm seeing
> more and more spam with these kinds of things in them to get by URI
> detection..
>
> http://asia.geocities.com/april19781matt1487
>
Do you mean URIBL's? Not likely without major change.. URIBL
Chris Santerre writes:
>
> Hah! Am I reading that right? Translate English to English! I give them 1
> point for coming up with that one.
>
OT, but I recall reading that there are at least two "English to English"
translation books published. Guides for people who've learned English and
are havi
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:11:42 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> >Probably you haven't set trusted_networks and/or internal_networks
> >correctly, and you are getting ALL_TRUSTED firing on the in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:11:42 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
>Probably you haven't set trusted_networks and/or internal_networks
>correctly, and you are getting ALL_TRUSTED firing on the incoming mail from
>some of the boxes. This will add some negative po
Probably you haven't set trusted_networks and/or internal_networks
correctly, and you are getting ALL_TRUSTED firing on the incoming mail from
some of the boxes. This will add some negative points, and possibly result
in the mail not being marked as spam. Depending on what you are using to
call S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:32:55 -0500 (EST), Frank Bures wrote:
>I am testing SA for several test users on my mail server.
>
>Everything was going OK when suddenly SA started to ignore any mail coming
>outside of my own domain. So any mails sent by any
Frank Bures wrote:
>
> I am testing SA for several test users on my mail server.
>
> Everything was going OK when suddenly SA started to ignore any mail
> coming outside of my own domain. So any mails sent by any of my
> machines contain "X-Spam" in their headers, any mails coming from
> outside
Hello.
Im using postfix 2.1.5 + spamassassin 3.1.0a-2 + amavisd-new
20030616p10-5
In the last weeks the size of false-negatives (fn) is grow
significatelly. All this fn do not have scores of type BAYES_XX (and I
think that is not normal).
When I check the same message (fn) with spamc, then the m
Quoting Billy Huddleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is their a way to get the URI's to look at stuff like this?? I'm
> seeing more and more spam with these kinds of things in them to get
> by URI detection..
>
> http://asia.geocities.com/april19781matt1487
I am seeing a lot of them as well, and now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am testing SA for several test users on my mail server.
Everything was going OK when suddenly SA started to ignore any mail coming
outside of my own domain. So any mails sent by any of my machines contain
"X-Spam" in their headers, any mails comi
Hello Guys,
I have SA running with amavisd/postfix. I also have several external
users with dinamic IP addresses which are allowed to relay using my
server because they authenticate, i have SASL running.
The problem is that right after publishing my SPF informations and
enabling SA
39 matches
Mail list logo
