On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 15:01 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> > >> Hi Yousef,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the interne
I wrote these rules last week that stop em fast, even before the URIBL's
kick in.
# This will fire if 2 or more are found
rawbody __DRUGS268A /^V$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268B /^I$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268C /^C$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268D /^E$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268E /^33$/i
rawbody __DRUGS268F /^\=20$/i
meta DRUGS
> b. Does anyone have any utilities to get statistics from SA? Such as
Can't help you on your first question, but likely someone else can.
On the second question, there are two different stats scripts. Confusingly
enough they are BOTH named sa_stats.pl.
One is distributed with SA itself. I fo
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 23:23 +, Craig McLean wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> [snip sendmail discussion]
>
> > I've about come to that conclusion myself, so I'm now investigating the
> > fetchmail->procmail_>dovecot solution right now. But th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip sendmail discussion]
> I've about come to that conclusion myself, so I'm now investigating the
> fetchmail->procmail_>dovecot solution right now. But the dovecot
> mailing list might be a problem, I've subbed about an hour
On Saturday 11 February 2006 08:25, Craig McLean wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>[snip fetchmail discussion]
>
>> In further reading tonight, sendmail grew the libmilter freature at
>> 8.12, which is the base version running here, and yum won't update
I have to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who contributed to this
thread. My filter is working 500% more efficient that it ever was. I have
done the following:
1. Installed djbdns and I am using dnscache as I was told. I have
increased the cache size to 100 Megabytes and completely d
You are completely correct, qmail-scanner does use spamc to talk to the
already running spamd. I just had trouble explaining what the setup was
I may indeed look into having procmail be the agent for Spamassassin. As
for automatic deletion, well that's a decision we made and for the most part
All,
Is anybody having any luck with the Stock spam that consists of an image and
"noise" to through off bayes?
One example is for (CIVX)
TIA,
> > I want to integrate Spamassassin with qmail + Qmail-Scanner to mark
email
> > that be suspected SPAM, with ***SPAM*** in it's subject.
> >
> > Should I remove the # sign in local.cf? # rewrite_header Subject
> > *SPAM*
> >
> > Please advise. Thanks alot for your help
> >
> That depends
Thanks. Setting the score to 0.001 did the trick.
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.askesis.nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two rules in a file "/etc/spamassassin/80_jkr.cf" that seem be to
> skipped by spamassassin:
>
> bodyJKR_TEST_BODY_RULE/e/
> score JKR_TEST_BODY_RULE0.0
> describeJKR_TEST_
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two rules in a file "/etc/spamassassin/80_jkr.cf" that seem be to
> skipped by spamassassin:
>
> bodyJKR_TEST_BODY_RULE/e/
> score JKR_TEST_BODY_RULE0.0
> describeJKR_TEST_BODY_RULEJKR body rule
>
> header
Awie wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My apologize for the question of beginner.
>
> I want to integrate Spamassassin with qmail + Qmail-Scanner to mark email
> that be suspected SPAM, with ***SPAM*** in it's subject.
>
> Should I remove the # sign in local.cf? # rewrite_header Subject
> *SPAM*
>
> Pl
Hi,
I have two rules in a file "/etc/spamassassin/80_jkr.cf" that seem be to
skipped by spamassassin:
bodyJKR_TEST_BODY_RULE/e/
score JKR_TEST_BODY_RULE0.0
describeJKR_TEST_BODY_RULEJKR body rule
header JKR_TEST_HEADER_RULE Subject =~ /e/
scor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Heskett wrote:
[snip fetchmail discussion]
>
> In further reading tonight, sendmail grew the libmilter freature at
> 8.12, which is the base version running here, and yum won't update it,
> says its current.
What version of the OS are you run
*Apologies if you've already seen this - I can't find any indication
that it sent when I hit send and I'm fooling with a new mail client*
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:21:25 -0500, you wrote:
>I think I know a bit about extracting URLs from spam ;)
A bit.
>It is pretty damn complicated. A lot of
Hi All,
My apologize for the question of beginner.
I want to integrate Spamassassin with qmail + Qmail-Scanner to mark email
that be suspected SPAM, with ***SPAM*** in it's subject.
Should I remove the # sign in local.cf? # rewrite_header Subject
*SPAM*
Please advise. Thanks alot for y
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 11:42 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
> >> Hi Yousef,
> >>
> >>
> >>> I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
> >>> not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to cha
Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:41 +, Shane Kelly wrote:
Hi Yousef,
I have to connect through a proxy server to get to the internet but I'm
not sure how to set the proxy for curl. I tried to change the line
in /var/lib/spamassassin/rules_du_jour
To this:
[ "${CURL_OPTS}" ]
Marcos Manhanes wrote:
Friends,
I have a Mailserver with QMAIL and Spamassassin running but it now has a
problem.
Ex.
Feb 10 11:10:34 Mailserver kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 13335
(spamassassin).
Feb 10 11:12:03 Mailserver kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 13371
(spamassassin).
F
Friends,
I have a Mailserver with QMAIL and Spamassassin running but it now has a
problem.
Ex.
Feb 10 11:10:34 Mailserver kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 13335
(spamassassin).
Feb 10 11:12:03 Mailserver kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 13371
(spamassassin).
Feb 10 11:13:51 Mailserver
On Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 22:42 Ed Russell wrote:
> I was doing some reading and I am beginning to look into Rules Du
> Jour. I see there are quite a large number of rulesets to choose
> from when utilizing this. Does anyone have any advice on what ones
> would be safe?
I use those:
SARE_ADUL
On Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 19:32 Ed Russell wrote:
> 1. Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I
> know there are quite a few.
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, multi.surbl.org, safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
dnsbl.njabl.org, bl.spamcop.net, relays.ordb.org
I use those at MTA level. That drop
24 matches
Mail list logo
