On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I'm using it now. Let's give it a few days to see how it goes. I rarely
have more than 14 days where it doesn't puke on me.
-Dan
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey All,
I've been running the latest spamd for months now, and it seems to be
I just committed version 01.00.07 of this ruleset to:
http://rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
This one should now --lint fine with the SA SVN version. Added a 0. to
the scores.
It should appear within the hour.
Enjoy.
-Doc (SA/SARE/URIBL/SURBL -- Ninja)
http://businesgroupny.com
You'll see neat little bulk email tools they use for sending their
phishes
* http://businesgroupny.com/bulk/
* http://businesgroupny.com/index.php -> Fi$hY Productions
;)
Evan,
The spammer is Taiwan Media (Telecom long ago) Ltd. They're using
the domain swzo.com-MUNG with Whois/registration contacts email account at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and DNS from ns[12].0l23.com-MUNG. They are listed in
Spamhaus' ROKSO with more data there - friends/associates of
Evan Platt wrote:
> Well, as if there's a NON annoying spammer..
>
> I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
>
> http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
>
> Best way I can see to drop this guy is to block on "The Bat! (v3.62.14)
> Home" in the header.
>
> Near as I can see sear
Evan Platt a écrit :
> Well, as if there's a NON annoying spammer..
>
> I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
>
> http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
>
> Best way I can see to drop this guy is to block on "The Bat! (v3.62.14)
> Home" in the header.
>
> Near as I can see s
On Monday, February 20, 2006 @ 12:57:42 PM [-0700], Evan Platt wrote:
>>> http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
>>
>> I tried to take a look at your example but the link is not working for
>> me...just sends me to your main index page.
> Oops, I misspelled it. Fixed now.
Aha...see it
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
yes, I'm a little worried about that, too.
So from these results, the FP rate is very low for SURBL (0.21%), and
while there is a ton of overlap for spam (57.3%), there's very little
for ham (0.01%).
aha, that's very inte
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> > yes, I'm a little worried about that, too.
> So from these results, the FP rate is very low for SURBL (0.21%), and
> while there is a ton of overlap for spam (57.3%), there's very little
> for ham (0.01%).
On Monday, February 20, 2006 @ 12:07:13 PM [-0700], Evan Platt wrote:
> I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
> http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
I tried to take a look at your example but the link is not working for
me...just sends me to your main index page.
> Best wa
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> yes, I'm a little worried about that, too.
Just for some info... I went through the set1 spam logs for 3.1 score
generation.
1112804 total messages
776108 messages hit SURBL
138407 1 SURBL list(s) hit (1+ = 776108)
189795 2 SURBL
Evan Platt writes:
>
> Well, as if there's a NON annoying spammer..
>
> I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
>
> http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
>
> Best way I can see to drop this guy is to block on "The Bat!
> (v3.62.14) Home" in the header.
>
> Near as I can see
Well, as if there's a NON annoying spammer..
I'm getting HAMMERED with the re: Hello spams.
http://www.espphotography.com/stopthisspammer.txt
Best way I can see to drop this guy is to block on "The Bat!
(v3.62.14) Home" in the header.
Near as I can see searching my 4+ years of archived messa
Thanks, I got it work. Was looking at report not summary.
Jonn
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:17:50 -0800
"Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-wich is
working, an
Chris Thielen writes:
> Now for a scoring question: isn't the perceptron supposed to factor out
> decisively overlapping rules? If so, why the enormously high scores for
> all the different uribls? From my stats, I get 50% of spam that hits
> SURBL hitting 4 or 5 of the SURBL lists. Shouldn't t
- Original Message -
>I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
>X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-wich is
>working, and non-spam.
>
Jonn,
Sorry, here is how I do it.
fold_headers 1
clear_headers
add_header all Autolearn Autolearned as _AUTOLEARN_
add_header al
Erwin Zavala wrote:
> How do I prevent the ssubject tag from being appended.
>
> When i use
> rewrite_subject 0
> subject_tag [SPAM]
> it does not help
What version of spammassasin are you using?
That syntax isn't valid in SA 3.0.0 or higher.
SA 3.0.x and 3.1.0 use "rewrite_header" commands ins
I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-wich is
working, and non-spam.
Jonn
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:55:24 -0800
"Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
I tried to do it with the add_header option but
How do I prevent the ssubject tag from being appended.
When i use
rewrite_subject 0
subject_tag [SPAM]
it does not help
when I remove those two lines it does not help.
Here is my user_prefs
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [SPAM]
report_safe 0
clear_headers
add_header all Flag _YES
- Original Message -
>I tried to do it with the add_header option but I only get
>a blank line with X-Spam-Report. A little more info for
>you: SA 3.1, RH9, Perl 5.8.0, CGP 5.0-8, MySQL. I am
>calling spamd with spamc via scanspam.sh that is sending
>the user to spamc. I am only adding
I'm also catching up on this thread and wasn't sure where to reply so
I'll make my observations here.
Matt, I think you have a legitimate concern. I think I can sum up the
points of view as follows:
1. For grey URIs (perhaps scott's, for example) and/or FPs due to
non-spam URIs being listed, a
I tried to do it with the add_header option but I only get
a blank line with X-Spam-Report. A little more info for
you: SA 3.1, RH9, Perl 5.8.0, CGP 5.0-8, MySQL. I am
calling spamd with spamc via scanspam.sh that is sending
the user to spamc. I am only adding headers to my email.
Jonn
On Mo
My favorite was an unsubscribe link that consisted of
http:// /optout.php?mail=
And yes, that was a space in there instead of a host/domain name.
It also had a big long message about how easy it was to "oppt out," that
they weren't "just saying that so that we can put on the facade tha
Title: RE: Over-scoring of SURBL lists...
I'm still catching up on this thread, but I have some points:
1) Matt's taking a beating, and he shouldn't be. I see his concerns. I might not agree, but he has legitimate reasons for bringing it up, and only serves to help all of us.
2) Perhaps an
It is quite simple if you are using MIMEDefang, I do it and have even
added a bit more information.
I think you can use the 'add_header' configuration option if you are not
using MIMEDefang. See Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and look at the
'add_header' option it looks like it could o the job if you
Hello,
I just configured a postfix mail server. Amavis with spamassassin and
clamav is installed on it.
I have some emails that get checked two times. And amavis seems to add
the two scores.
Here is an example :
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on guillaume.crbn.fr
X-Spam
Hi all,
Is it possible to have X-Spam-Report added to all email
headers(spam and non-spam) and if so how.
Jonn
List Mail User wrote:
>> ...
>> List Mail User wrote:
>>
>>> Huh? (Lookup "strawman" in a dictionary, please.)
>>>
>> That's my understanding of what you were claiming happened. Yes, it
>> looks like an absurdly weak argument. However, it's the argument you
>> presented, as best I can
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Henry F. Camacho, Jr. wrote:
> You are seeing the child of spamd. Both are not taking 20 megs of
> memory, that is the shared memory allocation. I think what you are
> seeing is the shared memory being applied to each of the other
> processes because spamd uses linux threads.
Hi!
This is a potential if a list will add a site on the basis of ONE
spam report. When it takes ten or twenty or more spam reports then
sites will get listed. Your Scotts example is an example of how a
large number of people would be likely to consider it to be spam
and complain. Upon receiving
Hi!
I have two things related to this:
1- if the lists are indeed separate (ie: different sources, etc,)
then having multiple rules makes sense.
They're about 95% separate.. They're all separately maintained, and have
a lot of different approaches to making sure a listing is valid.
I don't
31 matches
Mail list logo
