On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Andy Spiegl wrote:
> > Hi, I'm wondering why the default score for SPF_HELO_FAIL is only 0.001?
> > On the other hand SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL adds 3.14
> >
> > After reading "man Mail::SPF::Query" I thought fail is a lot worse than
> > softfail, right?
>
> At l
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
> > Use the 'REPORT' or 'REPORT_IFSPAM' spamd command instead of 'SYMBOLS'
> > or 'PROCESS' to get the full score report but not the full message.
> >
>
> This requires parsing the message.
>
>
> I would like getting something like:
>
> ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44,MISSING_S
John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Windows does not have anything like UNIX domain sockets. The
>> closest thing to it would be a TCP server listening on 127.0.0.1
>> and only accepting connections from 127.0.0.1 - but that has the
>> same overhead as any o
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> >> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot
> >> less.
> >
> > ... any 3rd party tool to enhance and/or speed up window's built-in sockets?
>
> Windows does no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can probably set that up in local.cf with
clear_report_template
report _TESTSSCORES(,)_
That works. Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mouss wrote:
unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
symlinks are relative to the chroot. so
# ln -s /etc/foo /var/chroot/app/etc/foo
doesn't work (beca
mouss wrote:
> I would like getting something like:
>
> ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44,MISSING_SUBJECT=1.345
>
> instead of (REPORT):
>
> blahblah
> ...
> ...
> Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
Another thing is that I can't find a way to get the SA headers (as they
would be added by spamassassin) without having the full message sent
back (SYMBOLS doesn't return the score of each test). or am I missing
something?
Use the 'REPORT'
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in
>> disjoint jails
>
> Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount
> --bind?
/me comes to his senses
Of course you can't symlink out of a jail, duh
--
Matthew.van.
mouss wrote:
> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Eng
>...
>mouss wrote:
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>> While daryl's comment here isn't entirely on the mark, it is close.
>>> Daryl, read the docs closer. SA does accept this format.
>>>
>>> Stephan, If you want to do an implied mask to cover a whole, you MUST
>>> end in a . ie: you must use "10." not "10
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot
>> less.
>
> ... any 3rd party tool to enhance and/or speed up window's built-in sockets?
Windows does not have anything like UNIX domain sockets. The closest thing t
Justin Mason wrote:
Adam Lanier writes:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to g
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
> Another thing is that I can't find a way to get the SA headers (as they
> would be added by spamassassin) without having the full message sent
> back (SYMBOLS doesn't return the score of each test). or am I missing
> something?
Use the 'REPORT' or 'REPORT_IFSPA
Andy Spiegl wrote:
> Hi, I'm wondering why the default score for SPF_HELO_FAIL is only 0.001?
> On the other hand SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL adds 3.14
>
> After reading "man Mail::SPF::Query" I thought fail is a lot worse than
> softfail, right?
At least in SA's real world testing, SPF_HELO_FAIL had a wor
Justin Mason wrote:
> for what it's worth, the overhead of UNIX domain sockets is a lot less.
I confess, I don't use SA... but I've frequented this list for a long time
because I respect that expertise of SA users.
Anyway... the mail server software I use runs on Windows 2003 and, recently,
thi
Matt Kettler wrote:
In "old practice", 10.1=10.0.0.1 (a.b = 256^3 * a + b), and not
10.1.0.0.
Really? That's a new one by me.
This is a (deprecated?) BSD practice. it was coded in inet_addr.c and
was thus imported by many systems.
# ping 127.1
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
6
On 29-Mar-06, at 12:11 AM, Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
Looks like I have to enable SA in the 2nd server. It might be a spam hole if the spam sent to 2nd first, then forcily relayed to the primary.
If you are running postfix MTA on your 2nd server, you can map your email user list of main MTA serve
Adam Lanier writes:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
> > My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
> > this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
> > using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
> > a
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:50 -0800, Kenneth Kim wrote:
> My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
> this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
> using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
> a response/spam score from the se
My spamassassin is running on a remote server, no way to get around
this at the moment. I am connecting to spamd on the remote server
using sockets in php. Unfortunately I have to close the socket to get
a response/spam score from the server. Is there any other way to
promt a response from the serv
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> While daryl's comment here isn't entirely on the mark, it is close.
>> Daryl, read the docs closer. SA does accept this format.
>>
>> Stephan, If you want to do an implied mask to cover a whole, you MUST
>> end in a . ie: you must use "10." not "10". If you fa
Title: MEDIA: MIT antispam conference video
I missed the MIT conference. I thought it was April, and I was in Manhattan yesterday. If you are interested, you can watch the 6+ hours of video of it here:
http://spamconference.org/
The good thing is you can fast forward the boring stuff. The
Jason Morrill wrote:
Mike,
I believe the difference is that you're using MySQL for the database. I'm using
flat files in /home/user/.spamassassin. In my case when I run as 'root'
sa-learn looks for the database in /root/.spamassassin since that is the
current user's SA database location. In your
Belette wrote:
hello there !
IS there a way to get SA scores using a shell command :
e.g. :
# spam -score < mail.txt
# .045
depends on which headers you SA adds.
*) X-Spam-Score
(usually added with:
add_header all Score _SCORE_
).
If it looks like:
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
then
Mike,
I believe the difference is that you're using MySQL for the database. I'm using
flat files in /home/user/.spamassassin. In my case when I run as 'root'
sa-learn looks for the database in /root/.spamassassin since that is the
current user's SA database location. In your case the database loca
Title: BLOCK: Antifraud Fraud
This is getting scary. Chase manhattan fisher is continuing to morph. Check out this Phish:
http://204.17.79.197/wwwroot/gorilla/Chase.htm
Which links to:
http://genoma.cecalc.ula.ve/.chase/index.htm
These antifraud frauds need to get shutdown ASAP. I think
Belette wrote:
> On 3/29/06, Johann Spies < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:32:48PM +0200, Belette wrote:
> > >
> > >IS there a way to get SA scores using a shell command :
> > >
> > >e.g. :
> > ># spam -score < mail.txt
> > ># .045
> > >
> > >i need
yeah thx, but the result is a very long text.in fact, i need to use the score as a number.( for an intern use )maybe a shell script will be usefullis there any way to get this score in a shell script and use it in it... ( as a variable )
i do not want to use spamc -R file.txt | grep etcmay
> > Replying to myself... I upgraded Archive::Tar and the error is gone now.
>
> To what version?
>
>From 1.00 to 1.29.
Dale
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:32:48PM +0200, Belette wrote:
>hello there !
>
>IS there a way to get SA scores using a shell command :
>
>e.g. :
># spam -score < mail.txt
># .045
>
>i need this coz i do not want to filter all mails, i just need a score,
>without writing S
hello there !IS there a way to get SA scores using a shell command :e.g. : # spam -score < mail.txt# .045i need this coz i do not want to filter all mails, i just need a score, without writing SA header inside it
Thx
Edward Diener tropicsoft.com> writes:
deleted...
> >
> > sth like this?
> >
> > sa-learn --mbox --spam --showdots Thunderbird_Junk_folder?
>
> That was what I was looking for. Thanks !
and also pls take care of running user (-u) and database path (--dbpath), as
without running user param
Hi, I'm wondering why the default score for SPF_HELO_FAIL is only 0.001?
On the other hand SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL adds 3.14
After reading "man Mail::SPF::Query" I thought fail is a lot worse than
softfail, right?
"fail" means the client IP is not a designated mailer, and the sender
wants you to re
Looks like I have to enable SA in the 2nd server. It might be a spam
hole if the spam sent to 2nd first, then forcily relayed to the primary.
Thanks for all your opinions
Cheers
Joshua
martin wrote:
Joshua, C.S. Chen asiaa.sinica.edu.tw> writes:
Hi folks,
I am using spamassa
35 matches
Mail list logo
