Mike L wrote:
I am a new user. I am running on Windows 2003.
I have several domains on my servers.
I only want one domain on my server to use spam assassin. Where and what
do i need to do to only filter for 1 domain on my sever. Is this possible.
I would also like to setup wrongmx on this
On Thursday 15 June 2006 03:43, Alan Premselaar wrote:
Aside from the QP scatter, this subject doesn't look like it's properly
encoded. if memory serves, if the encoded subject needs to be broken
across multiple lines, each line needs to have its own encoding
start/end tags.
so it should
It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing is
that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the
e-mails!But, I have yet to see a way to filter against this. Any
thoughts?
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matt wrote:
It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing
is that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the
e-mails! But, I have yet to see a way to filter against this.
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:50 -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
So - like I said - this is visionary stuff. Think SQL - think outside
the box.
It's not all that visionary. Microsoft's been working on WinFS - a SQL
based system for storing files - for years. It's supposed to have been
released as a
I am currently using SA 3.1.3 with the following
Net-qmail (LWQ)
Simscan 1.2
Ripmine
Clamav
The problem currently is that all messages are being delvered striped of
their Subjects and Content
I am complealy stumped by this and all my google searches have come up
empty. Any help would be
Title: Block: Google servers still on RBLs?
I know this has been discussed before, but is there a reason google is still on RBLs?
Nz-out-0102.google.com
64.233.162.203 listed on bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2
Chris Santerre
SysAdmin and SARE/URIBL ninja
http://www.uribl.com
I'm wanting to know many times per year do SA admins have to retrain ?
Our setup sends mail to SA client for a score, then depending on score
stores a backup of the mail in spam/ham mail folders for later review in
case a mistake is made. We train SA and it detects flawlessly at this
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:17:51PM -0700, Harris, Jason (DIS) wrote:
I'm wanting to know many times per year do SA admins have to retrain ?
Our setup sends mail to SA client for a score, then depending on score
stores a backup of the mail in spam/ham mail folders for later review in
case
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:17:51 -0700, Harris, Jason \(DIS\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wanting to know many times per year do SA admins have to retrain ?
Our setup sends mail to SA client for a score, then depending on score
stores a backup of the mail in spam/ham mail folders for later
Harris, Jason (DIS) wrote:
I'm wanting to know many times per year do SA admins have to retrain ?
In a well-maintained install, you should NEVER have to retrain unless
you have a catastrophic failure that crashes your live system *and* your
backups.
Regular manual training of missed spam
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this has been discussed before, but is there a reason google is
still on RBLs?
Nz-out-0102.google.com
64.233.162.203 listed on bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblockip=64.233.162.203
2006-06-15T21:00:00Z
quote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Leverton wrote:
[snip]
We don't have an M$ mail server (and I for one don't want one). We're a
Unix shop, as qmail and qpsmtpd in our own headers shows :)
I'm quite prepared to believe this is a MS bug, it certainly looks like it.
13 matches
Mail list logo
