On Montag, 19. Juni 2006 05:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Meanwhile, I do think that filtering outgoing mail from such places
> as open internet nodes at hotels and other places like that is
> probably a good thing. But simply tagging by itself does not seem
> useful to me.
It's a legal thing: You are n
Here is another example that I was able to isolate to a test file.
The debug looks like this:
[28763] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_hashcash_double_spend
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x98a6e80))
[28763] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for check_for_spf_helo_pas
> debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in Bayes DB < 200
This says that you don't have Bayes trained. Before Bayes will score a
message it has to know what is ham and what is spam for you. To do that,
you need to specifically feed at least 200 hams and 200 spams to bayes,
tel
Does it mean anything with there is no test after the SPF failed: part of
the report?
I checked the from domain and it did not have a TXT or SPF record. It is
possible that it refused my DNS connection. I don't recall. I saved the
message to a file and ran spamassassin on it and it passes now.
Hi
i have this in my logs :
debug: lock: 5079 created
/var/spool/spamassassin/bayes.lock.mx1.scanerys.org.5079
debug: lock: 5079 trying to get lock on /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes
with 0 retries
debug: lock: 5079 link to /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes.lock: link ok
debug: bayes: 5079 tie-ing
Loren Wilton wrote:
> I found this in the original headers of a stock spam (before it picked up 67
> points on my system):
:-)
However what I have been seeing is that a lot of sites are processing
*outgoing* mail through spamassassin. More than likely a spam virus
infected cable 'bot sent the me
Why does the longreport get truncated sometimes?
It appears to have something to do with the percent sign in the rule
description. In the example below, the percent sign at the end of the
BAYES_50 description has been replaced with the word uppercase, which is the
last part AFTER the percent si
-
Call for Papers for ApacheCon US 2006 is currently open!
ApacheCon US 2006 will be held at the Hilton Hotel in Austin, Texas,
October 9-13, 2006.
The ASF and the conference producer—Full Circle Productions— invite
the Open Source community to send in session an
I found this in the original headers of a stock spam (before it picked up 67
points on my system):
X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00=-2.599,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.92,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.056,RAZOR2_CHECK=1.511,STOCK_ALERT=2.385
X-Spam-Score: 5.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on
Subject: PayPal Fraud Intention !!! Verify Account & Billing Information !!!
From: "PayPal.inc Security Center Department " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Its nice to know that they intend to defraud me. Maybe I won't bother
playing their game.
Loren
Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
What happens if the DNS records are not available?
We don't know if there is a TXT record or not.
Jim
Benny Pedersen wrote:
If the SPF module can't obtain the DNS TXT record due to timeouts, does
this
get reported as a SOFTFAIL?
Received-SPF: pa
On Sunday 18 June 2006 19:31, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster took the
opportunity to write:
> Is Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF adding the Received-SPF: Header?
>
> I don't see it in email that received by my server, except for email from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, it only defines a number of eval te
Is Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF adding the Received-SPF: Header?
I don't see it in email that received by my server, except for email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Benny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 10:56 AM
To: users@spamassass
What happens if the DNS records are not available?
We don't know if there is a TXT record or not.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: JamesDR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:03 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPF SOFTFAIL definition
Benny Pedersen wr
Benny Pedersen wrote:
If the SPF module can't obtain the DNS TXT record due to timeouts, does this
get reported as a SOFTFAIL?
Received-SPF: pass (amiga.junc.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
designates 209.237.227.199 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: unknown (asf.osuosl.org: error in pro
> If the SPF module can't obtain the DNS TXT record due to timeouts, does this
> get reported as a SOFTFAIL?
Received-SPF: pass (amiga.junc.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
designates 209.237.227.199 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: unknown (asf.osuosl.org: error in processing during lookup
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Pezhman Lali wrote:
> how Can I use two treshold in spamassassin, for
> example:
> 0-5 tagged messages, 5-15 delete message.
In SA alone you can't. SA just scores, something else has to take
action based on the score.
> my system was made by p3scan+spamassassin for incoming
If the SPF module can't obtain the DNS TXT record due to timeouts, does this
get reported as a SOFTFAIL?
Jim
hi
how Can I use two treshold in spamassassin, for
example:
0-5 tagged messages, 5-15 delete message.
my system was made by p3scan+spamassassin for incoming
and proxsmtpd + spamassassin for outgoing.
help me
best
Pezhman
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of s
Hello,
I keep receiving messages that contain of nothing but composed images.
They're HTML messages with only tags in them. There seems to be a
rule that checks if the message has *any* image and compares it to its
length. That gave my spam some scores recently but not so today. I
received a messa
On 18.06.2006 03:51 CE(S)T, Loren Wilton wrote:
> The rule you suggest isn't particularly good. There are far too many legit
> mails (mostly mailing list type of things) that do exactly what you want to
> check for. So the FP rate is higher than most people would like.
However, I haven't seen th
On 18.06.2006 04:29 CE(S)T, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Actually that is a rule already in 3.1 (HTTPS_IP_MISMATCH) (anchor text
> has to be https w/ some http href which is an IP).
Well, if it really is, it doesn't work.
--
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://beta.unclassified.de
On Sonntag, 18. Juni 2006 04:31 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Sure. Use the MIMEHeader plugin. (you can even check out the other
> attachment name-related rules that exist... ;) )
Thank you, good hint!
> (full rules -- boo!)
Yes I know, I read this, that's why I asked. Now I want to
have the same
23 matches
Mail list logo
